• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Spector Club - Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Id like to get my hands on one of those bubinga tops. Bubinga and Walnut have to be my favourite woods.

Those two are very different. The Euro 4LX with the alder back and bubinga front is definitely a unique Spector tone. It doesn't have quite the top end growl that is so uniquely Spector. However, it has a mid punch that is unique in the Spector world from the ones I've played.

My US NS4 with the walnut back and buckeye front has that growl in spades! I find that the Walnut back over all maple gives it a little more low end heft though. It is just super growly, which to me is the Spector sound I have always loved.
 
Those two are very different. The Euro 4LX with the alder back and bubinga front is definitely a unique Spector tone. It doesn't have quite the top end growl that is so uniquely Spector. However, it has a mid punch that is unique in the Spector world from the ones I've played.

My US NS4 with the walnut back and buckeye front has that growl in spades! I find that the Walnut back over all maple gives it a little more low end heft though. It is just super growly, which to me is the Spector sound I have always loved.

To me the ultimate for the Spector Sound is the configuration of the 1980's NS-2 models... Solid Maple wings, Maple necks with Pau Ferro fingerboards, EMG P/Js and the USA 9v Tone Circuit. That's the classic sound.

Scanning brochures from the early 1980's right now. PJ sent them for me to add to the website.

Yep. I'm loving me some early 1980's NS-2 photos right now.

:-)
 
Those two are very different. The Euro 4LX with the alder back and bubinga front is definitely a unique Spector tone. It doesn't have quite the top end growl that is so uniquely Spector. However, it has a mid punch that is unique in the Spector world from the ones I've played.

My US NS4 with the walnut back and buckeye front has that growl in spades! I find that the Walnut back over all maple gives it a little more low end heft though. It is just super growly, which to me is the Spector sound I have always loved.

Yeah, no doubt they would change the sound a lot.

Im very intrigued by a walnut backed US NS4 or 5. I like a little more low end to my sound. It would still have the punch and growl from the maple neck, which I also enjoy, without some of the shrillness and clankyness Ive heard in some USAs. Even on my Euro I find myself cutting the highs more often that not..

As far as bubinga, I have a bubinga topped Legend 4. My first Spector. I love the look of it and I like the tonal characteristics it gives Rickenbackers (from what I understand most of their necks are bubinga). Id be interested in hearing a Spector with a little bubinga in the mix.
 
I saw this Spector 4 on GC and not sure which model it is?!
Anybody know? Since I'm not able to upload a pic on my iPhone I'll describe it. It has a single PU with only two control knobs. It's a solid body flame orange. I've searched the Spector history pics. Can't find it.
They're asking $174.99
 
This one has been upgraded with the active EMG pickups and pre-amp, tone is really versatile, has the thin neck which is easy to play, I just added a drop D tuner to it. Great sounding and playing bass.

Number please?
 
I saw this Spector 4 on GC and not sure which model it is?!
Anybody know? Since I'm not able to upload a pic on my iPhone I'll describe it. It has a single PU with only two control knobs. It's a solid body flame orange. I've searched the Spector history pics. Can't find it.
They're asking $174.99
Variation on an NS2000?
I believe there was an NS1000 that isn't listed on the Spector site that I can see.

My knowledge of the extremely low end models is extremely low end.:p
 
I saw this Spector 4 on GC and not sure which model it is?!
Anybody know? Since I'm not able to upload a pic on my iPhone I'll describe it. It has a single PU with only two control knobs. It's a solid body flame orange. I've searched the Spector history pics. Can't find it.
They're asking $174.99

OK. Look a little closer guys. It's at the bottom of this page, 2nd from the bottom.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

It's an NS-2000B... made in China. Single humbucker. NS-2000 body style.
 
Variation on an NS2000?
I believe there was an NS1000 that isn't listed on the Spector site that I can see.

My knowledge of the extremely low end models is extremely low end.:p

No such thing as an NS-1000.
Perhaps you're thinking of the NS-2000B.
It's an NS-2000 body shape with a single passive humbucker and passive electronics.
Traditional style bridge, mounted flat onto the body. No routing.
 
Now WHY did you have to link me to that page?
BRING BACK THE B.O.B. !!!! ;)

The B.O.B. was actually sort of the experiment that developed into Stuart wanting to do a full-blown jazz style bass... which is the Coda.

And I know I was sort of... yeah whatever... regarding the Coda when it first came out... but man. It's wicked nice. Sounds amazing. The neck is butter.

B.O.B. = Bolt On Bass, BTW. Stuart has experiemented with a lot of designs over the years. The B.O.B. wasn't in as high a demand as the Coda is. We sell Codas before they are finished. It's nuts.

BTW: Check the Coda-5 (Serial # 001) that PJ and I had at BPL. I can now say who bought it. They've been caught playing it live. :-)

mike145.jpg


Yup. I shipped it to him and he played it the night he got it. Loves it from what I hear.

Mike Kroeger owns the first Coda-5.

Anyway, the B.O.B. is VERY rare. If one ever comes available... you should grab it. I've never seen one for sale. But I know three people who own one *outside of SPECTOR.

You guys should really dig around this area of the site more. There's all sorts of answers to questions you may have in there. That's why I built it.

Oh... and I'm looking for a Brooklyn NS-2... but I'd not turn down the right opportunity for an SD-4. I love that bass. ANd they are very rare as well.
 
Oh I remember the B.O.B. very well...and wanted one so badly, but alas I was in college, and broke most of the time, and even if I could have afforded one there was nowhere in my neck of the woods to get one, and even fewer stores that had the slightest idea what a Spector was....LOL.
I realize the Coda is the new Bolt-On-Bass...but to be honest, and you can hate me for saying this...to me, it is very uninspired, and just seems to be Spector's attempt to capitalize on what everyone else is doing. I'm sure its a wonderful jazz bass, and I'm very glad that Mike Kroeger got the the first one, and that Spector can't make them fast enough...but I'm just not ever gonna shell out that kinda dough for a Jazz bass copy...but then again, I'm not a jazz bass guy.
 
OK. Look a little closer guys. It's at the bottom of this page, 2nd from the bottom.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

It's an NS-2000B... made in China. Single humbucker. NS-2000 body style.

Saw that. Discounted it as being the exact model as the GC one only has two knobs (as probably iceboxbass did also).
Invalid Link Removed

Maybe I just saw someone list one as such (NS1000) and that put it in my (old) brain. :p
Still, there is not a 2 knob version listed on the Spector site that I see. :hmm:
Is this a "missing link"?

Another curious thing: The "single humbucking" pickup on the NS-2000B also has "passive EQ".
Why 4 control knobs? Volume & tone for each coil?
 
Saw that. Discounted it as being the exact model as the GC one only has two knobs (as probably did iceboxbass).
Invalid Link Removed

Maybe I just saw someone list one as such (NS1000) and that put it in my (old) brain. :p
Still, there is not a 2 knob version listed on the Spector site that I see. :hmm:
Is this a "missing link"?

Yeah this is some gray area...

I may have this wrong, I really haven't had more than a two sentence conversation with PJ about it because I came across a model that wasn't anything we'd ever built and it confused me. According to PJ there was a company that SPECTOR contracted with that was allowed to make low-end models for the Asian secondary markets. They were not Spectors in the sense that they were not made for SPECTOR and were not distributed through SPECTOR's distribution channels. This was short lived.

This could be what you are talking about.

I asked PJ and Stuart, and the official word is, if it isn't on the website, it's not a Spector.

This is why we spent so much time flushing out the Past Models section. To clear up any misinformation. Luckily, other than the blatant design borrowing of a large guitar company that will remain unnamed; we've run across very few counterfiets and knock-offs. The worst I've seen is someone trying to pass off a high-end Legend as an early Euro model with a dot neck... that sort of thing.
 
Oh I remember the B.O.B. very well...and wanted one so badly, but alas I was in college, and broke most of the time, and even if I could have afforded one there was nowhere in my neck of the woods to get one, and even fewer stores that had the slightest idea what a Spector was....LOL.
I realize the Coda is the new Bolt-On-Bass...but to be honest, and you can hate me for saying this...to me, it is very uninspired, and just seems to be Spector's attempt to capitalize on what everyone else is doing. I'm sure its a wonderful jazz bass, and I'm very glad that Mike Kroeger got the the first one, and that Spector can't make them fast enough...but I'm just not ever gonna shell out that kinda dough for a Jazz bass copy...but then again, I'm not a jazz bass guy.

No I totally understand what you are saying and I feel the exact same way... in regards to the Coda is not something I'd purchase or want to own. I'm not a J-bass player either.

But I have a good friend who is a great jazz bassist and all he plays are old Fender J's and his 1967 Mustang bass. And he's seen and played my NS-4 and other NS-Body Spectors and they don't do a thing for him. He doesn't care for them.

And he's dying to get his hands on a Coda. He was touring when I had one here and missed the chance.

What I can say is that yes, it seems uninspired, but to someone who lives, eats, sleeps Jazz, that 1962 Fender J is the end-all-be-all. And you can buy a lot of very expensive... let's call them tributes. Because they are way too nice to be "knock-offs" It's that formula of shape, materials, electronics that makes that bass sound and play the way it does.

So if that's what you are into, you're very picky about anything that's not the original deal. And builders can't stray too far from the original formula before they have something that isn't going to sound or play the way these dedicated bassists expect it to play. So the designs are all going to be similar in a way. They have to be.

What Stuart does and does better than anyone I know, is add his own spin to whatever he does. And his ability to construct necks that you want to slap someone over (because they are so good) is mind-blowing. So he's put his signature flair for sound, tone, playability and impeccible contruction quality into this well-known formula and come up with something just different enough that it's a breath of fresh air.

And I watched two dozen hard-core, well known J players all sit down and have that look of... "OK here's another one..." and not be excited... only to watch their faces light up and them get excited playing it.

Think about what makes the NS so special to you... the Coda is doing that for the "J" players. And it's just further proof to me that Stuart has a rare gift when it comes to building instruments.

So I'm a believer. I have no doubt the Coda is to the J world what the NS is to us neck-thru active/active junkies.

And just as those J guys are totally unimpressed with the NS... it's natural for us to be "ho-hum" about the Coda.

My thing is that looking at pricing... you're getting a hand-made top quality J for thousands less than some of the other big names in that market. And it's hand-made by Stuart. So you can't go wrong with it in my book.
 
According to PJ there was a company that SPECTOR contracted with that was allowed to make low-end models for the Asian secondary markets. They were not Spectors in the sense that they were not made for SPECTOR and were not distributed through SPECTOR's distribution channels. This was short lived.

This could be what you are talking about.

I asked PJ and Stuart, and the official word is, if it isn't on the website, it's not a Spector.
Not sure if we're talking about OLP. They were making a "Spector", but it was "officially licensed" of course. Plus it said "OLP" on the headstock. This two knob GC piece has the Spector logo.

Did these "Asian contracted" basses have the actual Spector logo?

RE:"...the official word is, if it isn't on the website, it's not a Spector."
Now, now. We know there are waaaaay too many transition/oddities out there to stand by a statement like this.
;)
 
OK. Look a little closer guys. It's at the bottom of this page, 2nd from the bottom.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

It's an NS-2000B... made in China. Single humbucker. NS-2000 body style.

I'd have to say no it's not a ns-2000B... The NS-2000B has 4 electronic controls... This Spector bass on GC has only 2. Unless it was an option? Here's the URL, Invalid Link Removed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.