TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Those mods sound great. Just wondering if you ever considered a Sterling Sub short scale since it sounds like they’d put you roughly at that price point.
Serious GAS for one these babies!
Lake placid blue or black? The charcoal looks cool to but I want a maple neck.
Both look great...
Decisions...
You didn't miss much by not listening to the stock MM pickup in the Jaguar. It is nice and loud but really lacks definition for cutting through the mix. Maybe just some good old school thump but that's about it. I am getting my Norstrand 4.2 next week and will have the guitar tech install with a 3 position switch. Any advice about the wiring?I just recently added one of these to the collection and thought I'd share a few thoughts (for anyone who may still be on the fence).
I only have one bass with a maple fingerboard, so I ended up going with the LPB/maple combo, which I think looks pretty nice. Our own Maurilio Mina (Mo) did the work at Nordstand Audio, and I essentially had a "light" version of what Cantstandsya did and showcased in earlier posts - I didn't change out any hardware.
Upgraded the pickup to a MM4.4, swapped out the pots/jack/wiring and settled on a stacked Vol/Tone on Pot 1 with a 4-way rotary selector on Pot 2 (Series, Parallel, Neck Single Coil, Bridge Single Coil). This is not my first/only 32" bass, but overall, I'm really impressed with the overall weight, quality of parts, playability and fit-n-finish.
The quality/details on the Squire Mini P (which I also love) is not up to this quality....it isn't bad for the "bang for the buck value of a sub-$200 bass, but the difference between $180/$250 is evident. You can tell that the difference is reflected in the fit and finish.
One of the bid changes that Fender has made (over older budget models) is the satin finish on the back of the neck. I'm fine with cost-saving poly on the body/front of headstock, but the thick, glossy (and STICKY) finish on the back of the neck that was the standard for so many years is not missed at all. The neck shape is very comfortable and is lightening fast. The maple looks nice (defect free, is visually appealing) and the thing sounds great....with the benefit of the upgraded electronics. Full disclosure - I never even heard the stock stuff....I just knew that it would not be to my liking at this price point, so I sent straight in on the upgrade.
It's pretty amazing what you can get for so little, if you're willing to invest in a few upgrades and a quality set-up.
i guess it may depend if you intend live vs studio use. in the studio i want something to "sit in the mix" more than "cut through the mix" .. the p bass is the most used bass for this situation for a reason..and i find the pickup on this jag to be very similar to the p . also in the studio the neck dive matters far less. i think this bass is great for studio work. i don't really ever play live but if i did i probably wouldn't choose this one.You didn't miss much by not listening to the stock MM pickup in the Jaguar. It is nice and loud but really lacks definition for cutting through the mix. Maybe just some good old school thump but that's about it. I am getting my Norstrand 4.2 next week and will have the guitar tech install with a 3 position switch. Any advice about the wiring?
You didn't miss much by not listening to the stock MM pickup in the Jaguar. It is nice and loud but really lacks definition for cutting through the mix. Maybe just some good old school thump but that's about it. I am getting my Norstrand 4.2 next week and will have the guitar tech install with a 3 position switch. Any advice about the wiring?
Thanks. I usually use series on my switchable basses except when I solo. Wanted that option on the Jaguar.Not necessarily. It just really depends on what you prefer. I went MM4.4 because I wanted to have the series/parallel/single coil set-up that I have on my EMBB Sterlings (via the 3-way selector switch on those basses) and when used in single coil mode, I wanted to be able to use the unused coil as aa "dummy" coil for noise-canceling. That also gave me the ability to (by going what a 4 way rotary vs a 3 way) select each coil individually (closest to neck and closes to bridge). This isn't really necessary, but its fun and nice to have. Plus, just having a quality Nordstrand alnico MM (regardless of whether you prefer series or parallel, etc.) should be a significant improvement.
If you can, you should at least give yourself the option of series and parallel, but if you have to choose, it's just personal choice. I tend to be a "series" guy, and there are tons of threads here (and clips in youtube) that go into this topic.
If you're into aesthetics (and who isn't, at least a little bit), I also like the addition of the exposed pole pieces and traditional MM look as well.
I love mine but would have liked a maple neck.They were tough to get when I bought mine and I didn't want to wait,still I can definitely live with it.It's at my Techs' shop having a Sentell MM pup installed along with a Darkglass Tone Capsule preamp.Can't wait to share the results, hopefully making a favorite even gnarlier.I just recently added one of these to the collection and thought I'd share a few thoughts (for anyone who may still be on the fence).
I only have one bass with a maple fingerboard, so I ended up going with the LPB/maple combo, which I think looks pretty nice. Our own Maurilio Mina (Mo) did the work at Nordstand Audio, and I essentially had a "light" version of what Cantstandsya did and showcased in earlier posts - I didn't change out any hardware.
Upgraded the pickup to a MM4.4, swapped out the pots/jack/wiring and settled on a stacked Vol/Tone on Pot 1 with a 4-way rotary selector on Pot 2 (Series, Parallel, Neck Single Coil, Bridge Single Coil). This is not my first/only 32" bass, but overall, I'm really impressed with the overall weight, quality of parts, playability and fit-n-finish.
The quality/details on the Squire Mini P (which I also love) is not up to this quality....it isn't bad for the "bang for the buck value of a sub-$200 bass, but the difference between $180/$250 is evident. You can tell that the difference is reflected in the fit and finish.
One of the bid changes that Fender has made (over older budget models) is the satin finish on the back of the neck. I'm fine with cost-saving poly on the body/front of headstock, but the thick, glossy (and STICKY) finish on the back of the neck that was the standard for so many years is not missed at all. The neck shape is very comfortable and is lightening fast. The maple looks nice (defect free, is visually appealing) and the thing sounds great....with the benefit of the upgraded electronics. Full disclosure - I never even heard the stock stuff....I just knew that it would not be to my liking at this price point, so I sent straight in on the upgrade.
It's pretty amazing what you can get for so little, if you're willing to invest in a few upgrades and a quality set-up.
I love mine but would have liked a maple neck.They were tough to get when I bought mine and I didn't want to wait,still I can definitely live with it.It's at my Techs' shop having a Sentell MM pup installed along with a Darkglass Tone Capsule preamp.Can't wait to share the results, hopefully making a favorite even gnarlier.
Right you are,they all look good.I copped the Charcoal Frost one you're eyeing but would love the Blue w/ maple neck.Heck,for the price why not own two?grass is always greener yeh. i have the placid with maple and every time i see the charcoal one i question my choice. looks so good with the darker wood and pickguard. may have to pick that one up too and mod one and keep one stock or something :| all 3 of the color variants look great though. can't really go wrong.
What's the opinion of the tuners?View attachment 4417729
Modded with a Fender highmass bridge, new knobs and a Guitar Madness MM pickup wired in series.
They work fine and I have no intention of replacing them.What's the opinion of the tuners?
Mine work fine but I am replacing them with some lighter tuners to help a bit with neck dive.What's the opinion of the tuners?
If the body is too light, the neck dive will be worse. I would guess that they pay more attention to the quality and consistency of the necks more than the bodies. My gray Jaguar H is 8.16 lbs. and the neck dive is worse than on my Squier mustang bass. I have straps and changing the angle of the bass and height to help.Planning to put some hipshot ultralites when I get mine! Hopefully this Friday.
I hope I get a light one, around 8 pounds would be great!
Ok, the bass arrived but not happy with the weight, neck dive and shielding noise ( it goes away when I touch the bridge)
This bass is 8 pounds 11 ounces, so its basically one pound more than my Ibanez mezzo and my Sterling Stingray. What is usual weight of these basses?
The finish is fine, the fretwork is ok and I like how it sounds, at least playing by myself. In a band mix? We will see after the next gig or rehearsal.
But the shielding noise is pretty bad.
I think this bad boy is going back.