Thank god this thread wasn't about Rush.
Or Pink Floyd and Rush.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thank god this thread wasn't about Rush.
Aja: Rock and Roll’s answer to Kind of Blue.
I don’t know who he is and I couldn’t care less about his opinion.
You should! His studio has produced a ton of amazing albums. From Nirvana to Jimmy Page.I don’t know who he is and I couldn’t care less about his opinion.
Albini does recognise it. Reading the link in the OP is out of fashion, it seems.I could not possibly care less about his opinion on Steely Dan. There has always been damned fine musicianship on SD records. Even if someone doesn't like what they do, the should at least recognize that.
This is what's killing me in this thread. Forget about the Dan. Everyone in this thread is using the words "produced" and "producer" and this guy has produced nothing. He takes the music people have already written it and bottles it up as is.Q. How could you make this guy go really quiet?
A. Give him a chart to read.
Who cares?
This is what's killing me in this thread. Forget about the Dan. Everyone in this thread is using the words "produced" and "producer" and this guy has produced nothing. He takes the music people have already written it and bottles it up as is.
Now, there's nothing wrong with doing that. It's actually a very nice way to honor someone's creative abilities without altering their intent and there's a place in the world for it, for sure. But calling that "production" is a bridge way too far for me.
This is what's killing me in this thread. Forget about the Dan. Everyone in this thread is using the words "produced" and "producer" and this guy has produced nothing. He takes the music people have already written it and bottles it up as is.
Now, there's nothing wrong with doing that. It's actually a very nice way to honor someone's creative abilities without altering their intent and there's a place in the world for it, for sure. But calling that "production" is a bridge way too far for me.
This thread can easily be divided between age groups and whether or not you have an affinity for any alternative music whatsoever. To the boomers and older that have never listened to or care about any avante garde rock post late 80's... Steve is one of the most important and sought after music producers there is. I'm sure he can read a chart, score or whatever you throw in front of him and if he can't it still wouldn't have any effect on his contribution to music. You dismissing him, only shows your ignorance. Sorry.... truth...
That being said, I love Steely Dan. I love Shellac and Big Black and a whole lot of the music Steve has produced. I'd be willing to bet Steve watched the same documentary on Steely Dan that I did. Their approach to studio work, could be called interesting.... I mean if you have something of an unlimitied budget and access to some of the greatest session players around and make them do stuff over and over again until you find the magic, it's almost cheating, isn't it? It still doesn't make me like their stuff any less. Fagen and Becker are amazing writers.
But every time you people say "Steve who?", you're showing that you're the one that is ignorant.