• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Steve Albini explains why he hates Steely Dan

This has nothing to do with relevance, merely something cool. [re:re-recording Cheap Trick album].
Then why do you keep posting it, like it means something?

Look, I'm perfectly willing to believe Steve Albini is a highly skilled recording engineer. I'm also perfectly willing to believe that he and Cheap Trick re-recorded one of their most popular albums, and that the recording quality was better on the later product. But neither one of these gives him any particular authority on another band's work - a band that, from what I'm reading here, had a completely different ethos about rehearsing, playing, and recording.

Yes, Steely Dan's stuff is highly slick and carefully perfected. That's what they did. Of the bands that were listed in Albini's CV that I know about, they certainly tend more toward the "wild and woolly". I don't typically listen that closely to the nature of the recording itself; I'm more interested in the music; but I'm also perfectly willing to believe that Albini tends to come in set up some microphones and capture it the way it is that day. In fact, philosophically I like that attitude. But honestly, given what his actual role in all these records is, and everything else I'm reading here, I'd say he has about the same credentials to comment on Steely Dan's recordings and music, as would Big Mama Thornton on the Deutsche Gramophon recordings of La Mer by Debussy; in other words, the same credentials as any person off the street.
 
Lots of people have "helped change the face of music", but that doesn't mean that - for example - Leo Fender's opinions on the bass playing of Monk Montgomery versus John Entwistle would be of any particular importance.


Nobody is saying its particularly important. He's not winning a Pulitzer Prize for writing another hot take on why he doesn't like a popular thing. People are "interested" because he's a funny guy and never fails to rile up boomers and zoomers alike. He also happens to have built one of rock n roll's many historical recording studios. And for what its worth, I would love to hear Leo Fender's opinion on just about anything.
 
And The Breeders, PJ Harvey, Bush. Foo Fighters also recorded at his studio in 2014.

No producer has 100% artist recognition. Even guys like Rick Rubin or Butch Vig work with artists most of us have probably never heard of.
actually no i have never heard of the breeders or pj. barely know who bush is. couldnt tell you a single song and steve's list of artists is very long and did not see the foo fighters. But im still sticking with my original statement that steely dan is better than the collective work of all of the bands steve has produced.
 
Man, Steely Dan fans sure are a sensitive bunch. Meanwhile they write a song trashing John Lennon and nobody complains.

For the record, I like some Steely Dan songs a lot, I like some John Lennon songs a lot, and I like like some songs Steve Albini had a hand in a lot. Big deal.
This is all way too reasonable. Feel free to escort yourself from the thread.