• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stuck in the middle... dysfunctional trio

Hey all, looking for some band wisdom.

I joined a drummer and guitar player 15 months ago with the aim of a long-term development of a country rock trio. We all work day jobs, are in our late 40’s early 50’s, and we’ve practiced often twice a week to get to a level of “tight” that has been reflected in positive reviews of our gigs this year.

We have been gigging once or twice a month, although we took six weeks off in April/May while the drummer had knee surgery.

Coming off three straight weekend gigs in September that were all great, the drummer announced that he wants to take our sound to the next level by stepping out from behind the drummers and share the singing duty with our guitar player, and playing rhythm guitar. He says playing drums just isn’t fun for him, and he’d rather someone more talented take over.

Guitar player says the drummer is doing great, moving from a trio to a four piece group is going to add more schedule/personality burdens to keeping the band going, as well as cutting our individual take by 25%. And as a sole guitar player, adding a rhythm guitar will take away from our clean sound. Guitarist says we are thriving as a trio, and he is dead against changing the lineup.

So there we are a stalemate with the bass player in the middle. I like a three way split on money, and we sound good. Other than the money and logistic I have no issue with morphing into a 4 piece. But as it stands these two old friends (guitar player and drummer, friends since high school) are entrenched in their positions.

Short story: Successful band is about to dissolve over management differences.

Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Drummer has played drums all his life, been in other bands, very competent. Also, a very outgoing personality and does all backup vocals and shares crowd banter easily. He has a wireless headset.

He owns an acoustic guitar and an electronic keyboard. I have not heard him play guitar during the 15 months, and heard him play keys once or twice, just messing around with a Bryan Adams song.

We play Eagles Take it Easy, Already Gone, old country Cash, Hank Williams, Hank Williams Jr., we also do some new country Buy Me a Boat, What Was I Thinking, and 8 Second Ride. The new country sound seems to have less need for a rhythm guitar.

Overall, I think a rhythm guitar could improve the sound, especially during solos on songs like Hotel California.
 
Meh! If the dude wants to play guitar and sing, let him. Find another competent drummer. Be happy and play music. If it all falls down, oh well. Some of those songs you listed need a rhythm guitar ,IMHO. One sticking point I see would be if Mr. Former Drummer critiques Mr. New Drummer. That's gonna suck. But then, maybe it'll be a good thing and he can help the new guy out.
 
the drummer announced that he wants to take our sound to the next level by stepping out from behind the drums and share the singing duty with our guitar player, and playing rhythm guitar.
This seemed to work out for Aerosmith. :D

But as it stands these two old friends (guitar player and drummer, friends since high school) are entrenched in their positions.
Since they’re long time friends, you’re probably going to have to stand on the sidelines and let them hash it out. Then, let the chips fall where they may.
 
A trio can work (I played in a modern country band for several years with guitar, drums, bass, and a singer who played flute, sax, and a little acoustic guitar). Believe me, a second guitar will fatten the sound, assuming the guy has decent guitar chops. Question is - does he, or is he just strumming a few chords?