Not really. He knew the stated value of the goods when he recieved them. Just because he doens't think they are worth it does not mean that they aren't. Especially since they DO actually sell these cables for these prices (how, I will never know).PhatBasstard said:Oh, I agree. Return it. But to threaten Tim Cole with a $2000 credit report/legal hit for some "snake oil" (especially considering the raid and subsequent statement of seized worth of these cables) is ridiculous.
I understand Tim is in a tough spot, but if I was in Tara's position I probably would have already taken this to the next level. 9 months is way longer than the 90 days agreed upon and Tim unfortunately assumed responsibility for the cables.
I'm not saying he did anything intentionally worng here, but look at it from another perspective.
I have seen peoples claims here that a Sadowsky is really no better than a Fender (very arguable). So if Roger sent me a bass to try out for 90 days and I didn't return it for 9 months shoudl I just offer to send him the price of a Fender, or an SX Jazz?
Personally I would have my foot up someones ass at QSC until I got Bob on the phone and got the damn things back. IMO they aren't worth near the $ they charge for them and I certainly wouldn't want to be on the hook for them.
Tim, if you need me to track down something or someone for you, feel free to PM me. It's what I do for a living and I know there's probably no one on TB that wants this resolved more than you do. Let me know if I can help in any way.