Is the only difference between the new 115 and the old one the second tone print?
And new one has no tube-drive.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Is the only difference between the new 115 and the old one the second tone print?
And new one has no tube-drive.
Yes it does. You just have to use one of the two tone prints.
![]()
208 backside
Great way to do it
But the Power and speakon out might be too close of fit.
Power switch down low OK in my book since the mute is on top
Since it IS a BH250, the location of the everything on the back of the head is the same. Everything is workable but a bit less than ideal IMO. It really should have a "release" latch. Sticking my fingers behind it, it feels like it still has feet on it.
![]()
Can you figure out how it's attached?
I can't. It seems that it's probably screws/bolts from the inside of the cabinet. If it was mine outright, I'd open it up.

They probably just left the feet on it to space it out for cooling and used longer screws/bolts from inside the cab to the threaded feet holes![]()
It's disappointing that the other combos are not expandable. If the 212 and 210 (and even the 115) were expandable these combos would be a real market leader for sure.
There are certain cats around here (and I'll preface this by saying that their opinion is totally valid) that feel that the BH/BG units are basically toys for home, that have limited functionality as versatile gig tool. I'm starting to agree. I think TC might have missed an opportunity to slay that attitude with Gen 2.
Conversely though, one could argue that if they did make expandable combos they would need to up the wattage to 500w to compensate, and then they would have a product overlap with the BH500.
And this is why TC don't quite manage to get their hook into me. I'm a massive fan of the built in tuner, the toneprint and the portability of the BG/BH range, but as a guy who always runs with loud bands, I simply couldn't take the gamble on a low rated head or an unexpandable combo amp. I'd get buried.
So until TC come out with a higher rated micro head or expandable combo with the new dual toneprint functionality I'll be sticking with my GK.
While we can all see areas of improvement that might "hook" us, most products just can't be all things to all people.
I guess it's just wishful thinking.
Honestly, if TC got in on the high wattage Class D micros my wallet would probably scorch a hole clean through my pocket in seconds. A light and handy 500w BH with dual toneprint would devour all. An expandable BG combo with 250w on its own and 500w expanded would be the absolute dog's bollocks.
A dude can dream. Currently they don't have a micro or combo which is loud enough for my needs, so I can't find an excuse to get involved, even though I think their features (toneprint especially) are super cool.
I guess it's just wishful thinking.
Honestly, if TC got in on the high wattage Class D micros my wallet would probably scorch a hole clean through my pocket in seconds..
Well, they certainly have done that. Just no toneprint. If they added it to the RH series, they'd be sort of competing with themselves so....
A dude can dream...