• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Acoustic Club

Now to find a 402 in the Northeast!
I'll keep a look out for one, but GC is a great used source to monitor as they ship cheap. I had mine shipped to my local GC store. This was mine:

1B9619EB-78C2-4474-A554-2C42BF1834B2.png
 
Can't stop thinking about my 360. First thing I want to try. Plug in the 360 with my P, then jumper the other input jack to the input of the 330. Plug the 360 into the return signal of the B channel of the 330. Nothing in the send signal of B. Assign EQ and master volume to the A channel, and reverb to the B channel (to bypass it). Then set the control of the 330 to A or A+B. I assume this should give me the basic layout to use the 360 as the B preamp channel of the 330, without running the signal through the 330 B preamp itself. Unless of course the controls of the channel is located before the FX loop, and this way B is always engaged. Only one way to find out I guess. The idea is to set channel A as a nice and fat bassy channel, and use the 360 to be able to blend the dirty and fuzzy tones into that when wanted.
 
Can't stop thinking about my 360. First thing I want to try. Plug in the 360 with my P, then jumper the other input jack to the input of the 330. Plug the 360 into the return signal of the B channel of the 330. Nothing in the send signal of B. Assign EQ and master volume to the A channel, and reverb to the B channel (to bypass it). Then set the control of the 330 to A or A+B. I assume this should give me the basic layout to use the 360 as the B preamp channel of the 330, without running the signal through the 330 B preamp itself. Unless of course the controls of the channel is located before the FX loop, and this way B is always engaged. Only one way to find out I guess. The idea is to set channel A as a nice and fat bassy channel, and use the 360 to be able to blend the dirty and fuzzy tones into that when wanted.
I like the way you think:thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulltrout
I assume this should give me the basic layout to use the 360 as the B preamp channel of the 330, without running the signal through the 330 B preamp itself. Unless of course the controls of the channel is located before the FX loop, and this way B is always engaged.


No, you've got it right. Combining & switching is all done on the sum amp board which is downstream of the back panel individual channel Preamp-In jacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StingRay85
Can't stop thinking about my 360. First thing I want to try. Plug in the 360 with my P, then jumper the other input jack to the input of the 330. Plug the 360 into the return signal of the B channel of the 330. Nothing in the send signal of B. Assign EQ and master volume to the A channel, and reverb to the B channel (to bypass it). Then set the control of the 330 to A or A+B. I assume this should give me the basic layout to use the 360 as the B preamp channel of the 330, without running the signal through the 330 B preamp itself. Unless of course the controls of the channel is located before the FX loop, and this way B is always engaged. Only one way to find out I guess. The idea is to set channel A as a nice and fat bassy channel, and use the 360 to be able to blend the dirty and fuzzy tones into that when wanted.
Sounds like a key to the entrance to 'Jaco-Land'. Enjoy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: StingRay85
I use Acoustic B410C's, two of them, and had the B200H for years. It is one of the most powerful 200 watt amps I have ever used. I got rid of it because I actually wanted fewer tone controls. I now use a Hartke LH500 paired with the 2 Acoustic 410's. But, Acoustic is doing an amazing job of building quality equipment at prices that are very reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghostinthemach