• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Acoustic Club

Acoustic410.jpg


Vert. 10's interesting!

Looks like a Bag End Q10 with different dimensions. Reading your past experiences I'm assuming this has been critically voiced by its designers and any success wouldn't be surprising.

Thanks for the update. Any 15"-18" folded horn news?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreaserMatt
I don't know why you would have them daisy chained. Doesn't the B600H have two speaker outs on it? Both cabs are 8 ohms so you would be running at 4 ohms in parallel. I think the puts out 450W (?) at 4 ohms. Add up the wattage of each cab and if they are below 450W (which I don't they would be), then you'd have to be careful.
 
I have a question about the power handling of my cabs, i have the B600H paired with the B410 and B115 (they are daisy-chained)---am i running the risk of blowing these cabs or am I ok?

You should be, like, totally OK.:smug:

The B115 is rated at 250 W RMS and the B410 is rated at 400 W RMS. Both are 8 ohm cabs so will each pull about half the output power of the B600H when wired in parallel.

The B600 will put out approx 450-475 W RMS at 4 Ohms which would be about 225 W RMS or so per cab. Should be no problem.

Rock on!:bassist:
 
Just brought home my brand new B200H and B410. I'll post the obligatory pictures this weekend.

With a new band in the works, I was looking to upgrade my diminutive Carvin PB100-10 (an amazing little combo, btw) to something that could hold its own against a drummer and a guitarist with a half stack. I had originally planned on running my Tech 21 SansAmp Bass Driver straight into a Carvin DCM1000 power amp feeding one or two 4x10s, depending on volume needs. I had been generally dissatisfied with the tone of most amps, and the amps I actually liked were far outside my budget (coughAmpegcoughSWRcough). I had come to rely on my SansAmp to "fix" my tone, so I figured why not just run a pure SansAmp signal?

I hadn't heard of Acoustic before, and I have to admit that I wrote them off before even plugging in. "I'm looking for a good amp," I naively thought, "and good amps cost more money than this!" It was this thread and the recommendations of two Guitar Center employees that got me to actually test one out.

I'm playing an [Invalid or Expired Link Removed], which IMO has a very unique midrangey growl completely unlike your standard P or J tone (which is part of the reason I liked it). When I first plugged into the Acoustic stack at GC I was not impressed. Then I started fiddling with the EQ knobs, specifically 150Hz and 5kHz, and BAMF! The JTKB's relatively weak low end bloomed, and the 5k knob cleared up a lot of its muddiness. I turned to the employee and told him with a big satisfied grin, "So that's what everyone's talking about!"

I agree with the general opinion expressed in this thread: The Acoustic sounds how a bass amp should sound. I've not had much time with it yet, but it's doing a great job shattering my preconceived notions about price and wattage in relation to performance. For being "just" 200 watts (140W or so in my current setup), it's pretty friggin loud with a single 4x10 cab. I can't comment yet on the durability, but I know one owner that will vouch for its tank-like properties. If they're still making them like the old Acoustics, I'm certain I'll own this one for a very long time.

Now the big dilemma I'm facing is whether or not my SansAmp is even necessary any more. I'm finding for the first time that my amp has a great tone by itself, and the SansAmp is really just adding a bit of sparkle and oomph* instead of carrying my entire tone. I'm thinking I'll keep it, but maybe turn that Blend knob back a bit.

Anyway. I'll take on of those there numbers if ya got one to spare. That makes me #92, right? Cool. 1992 was a good year.

I met another TalkBass member at GC, but I can't remember his forum name. If you're reading, give me a shout!


* "Sparkle" and "oomph" are measurable scientific terms. Really.
 
Now the big dilemma I'm facing is whether or not my SansAmp is even necessary any more. I'm finding for the first time that my amp has a great tone by itself, and the SansAmp is really just adding a bit of sparkle and oomph* instead of carrying my entire tone. I'm thinking I'll keep it, but maybe turn that Blend knob back a bit.

* "Sparkle" and "oomph" are measurable scientific terms. Really.
I have the B200H and B600H and I still kept my fabulous SABDDI. Can't play w/o it. I'm addicted to it and it mates so well with these 2 heads.

See my post on my racking both of them up. 2 different threads.

Chris P.
 

Attachments

  • B600h_4.jpg
    B600h_4.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 93
  • Like
Reactions: GreaserMatt
I have the B200H and B600H and I still kept my fabulous SABDDI. Can't play w/o it. I'm addicted to it and it mates so well with these 2 heads.

I'm hopelessly addicted too. I've found that you're right; the Acoustic's EQ section is wonderful for filling in the gaps in the SansAmp's range. Likewise, the Bass knob on the SansAmp seems to affect my tone in a range not covered by the Acoustic. Although this could all be in my head. It just seems that the SansAmp gives a wonderful starting tone, and then the Acoustic shapes it even further.

is acoustic offering anything more powerful than the b200h now? i saw the price of the b200h and after seeing what you guys have said... my curiosity has been piqued.

Best place to go is the [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]! :)
 
I run part of my rig through an Acoustic 104 guitar 6x10 cab, which I think is fantastic sounding!!! and very powerful and portable. I would never part with this cab. Can I get an Acoustic club number?

Upstream of it is a Warwick Corvette 4, a Trace Elliot GP12 SMX preamp, a DBX 160A compressor, and a Gallien Krueger 400RB. Other cabs include an Ampeg 410 HE and a Peavey 4x12 guitar cab. Works for me!!! A lot of my tone is the Acoustic.

Heres a couple of pics of my amp and cab rigs. The Acoustic 104 is the middle cab obviously.

Thanks!!!
 

Attachments

  • marks_rig_1.jpg
    marks_rig_1.jpg
    62.5 KB · Views: 87
  • marks_rig_2.jpg
    marks_rig_2.jpg
    45.5 KB · Views: 91
I run part of my rig through an Acoustic 104 guitar 6x10 cab, which I think is fantastic sounding!!! and very powerful and portable. I would never part with this cab. Can I get an Acoustic club number?

Upstream of it is a Warwick Corvette 4, a Trace Elliot GP12 SMX preamp, a DBX 160A compressor, and a Gallien Krueger 400RB. Other cabs include an Ampeg 410 HE and a Peavey 4x12 guitar cab. Works for me!!! A lot of my tone is the Acoustic.

Heres a couple of pics of my amp and cab rigs. The Acoustic 104 is the middle cab obviously.

Thanks!!!

It looks like the speakers in the 104 aren't the origenal's. They should have aluminium domes and that would mean they are alnico's. Have you ever looked inside?
 
i just ordered an acoustic b100 i hope it was worth it... i only had a 200 dollar budget but decided to pay the extra 50 dollars for double the wattage instead of the ab50

anyone have a b100 im gonna be using a fender prec on it