• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The BASS TRADEOFFS Thread

KayCee said:
I've only played a Dingwall once, so I don't speak from much experience, but I *think* some people might say:

- Fanned frets solve the problem of even string response, but...
it feels really strange to play fanned frets, and they're tough to play blindly (as when you're singing), and a "fanned fretless" would be nearly impossible to play in tune.

BurningSkies said:
No and no. You can play without looking and they feel very natural.

I don't have a fanned fretless, but I know someone here who does and it doesn't seem to be a problem.

I'll just have to take your word for it on this one. Dingwall definitely has it's share of supporters on TB.
 
I'll chime in on the fanned frets thing... I owned a bass with the Novax fanned fret system (five string) and while it was not dramatically difficult, it will have you scratching your head if you like to do a lot of upper register work, especially tapping. Also, I found that going back to "traditional" instruments was a bit rough after spending a great deal of time on a fanned fretted instrument. It may just be me though...
 
With regards to the longer scale lengths damaging higher notes, maybe it's true for very high but I actually prefer a 35 inch high C in terms of tone. I don't know but having played 34 and 35 inch 6 strings I prefer the 35 inchers across the board. What exactly are the negative tonal effects supposed to be?
 
Plenty of good 34" 5-stings (low B) out there, but it seems like there are more bad 34's than bad 35's. It's probably easier to make them "good" with a 35" scale length but some builders have it figured out.

I dunno, it's rocket science I guess. ;)

Here's one - bass amps are always heavier loading out at the end of the night than they were loading in earlier that day...
 
Aj* said:
With regards to the longer scale lengths damaging higher notes, maybe it's true for very high but I actually prefer a 35 inch high C in terms of tone. I don't know but having played 34 and 35 inch 6 strings I prefer the 35 inchers across the board. What exactly are the negative tonal effects supposed to be?

One of the reasons that I returned to all 34" scale basses was the overly bright sound that 35" scale creates on the G string.

BTW, this reminds me that, while I think that the Dingwall fanned concept is extreme, a "modified Dingwall" might be great. With a 34" G string fanning to a 35" B string, you could have the best of both worlds. You'd still have fanned frets, but it wouldn't make you dizzy to look at the fingerboard.