So anyhow, on to the actual discussion and to respond to a few things you've said. There may be SOME truth to the idea that since all the music is free people are LESS discerning, but here's something to consider as well: Although music is often procured for free (especially by the youth), at that point the commodity that actually ends up being at a premium is the listeners TIME. When presented with so many choices, if you aren't discerning about what you download you could quite literally end up listening to TERRIBLE music all day every day.
I get the time and that does make sense. Though I would say that the majority of the youth doing P2P have plenty of it...
I posted in another thread, was too lazy to find it, so I'll just re-state. I just turned 40. During the 80's I was so desperate to find new music (At the time I was getting into Thrash, Speed, and Death Metal mostly) my friends and I would go to the sections, and buy stuff based off of band names and album covers. It was a gamble in which sometimes we lost, but it was worth the cost to find the gems. Maybe I was odd but the search was harder then, then now IMO. But I still did it. And I did Coulumbia House too, but they didn't have what I was looking for at the time...
That's exactly what I've been trying to say actually. Less and less acts will be extremely popular, because people are spending more time with more different artists.
I don't know man... I understand what you're saying and it DOES make sense. I see Lady Gaga, and the Black Eyed Peas everywhere though. It's not because I look for them either... Maybe I'm being to narrow though.