• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Mike Lull Club Part 4

So there I was, minding my own business, when I saw a Lull J5 that caught my eye.
It was built in 2005, which is the same year as my P5. Upon further inspection, I noticed that the serial numbers are one digit apart. I'm not sure what value that adds, but my P5 is killer, and I would imagine that the Jazz would be too.
Does anyone have an early 2000's Lull jazz bass who can offer any insight?
I had an early 2000s V4 jazz and it was the best passive jazz bass I have ever owned. Sold it when I went to 5s to a fellow TBer. He still has it. That should say something.
 
Several of my favorite Lulls were made in 2004-2005. Does your P5 have a chunky or slim neck? Some of the earliest P5s had a slightly thicker neck up near the nut, but pretty quickly the P5 and J5 had the same neck profile.

I wouldn't call it chunky. If I had to describe the neck, it would be "ideal." The body seems a bit thicker than the Fender bodies. It was built in November 2005 and bought at the 20006 NAMM show.

I had an early 2000s V4 jazz and it was the best passive jazz bass I have ever owned. Sold it when I went to 5s to a fellow TBer. He still has it. That should say something.
Thanks. I had a late 90's Lull 4 string Jazz. It was amazing. The bass I'm looking at is active. I'm not thrilled about that, but it's also not a deterrent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bdgotoh
I wouldn't call it chunky. If I had to describe the neck, it would be "ideal." The body seems a bit thicker than the Fender bodies. It was built in November 2005 and bought at the 20006 NAMM show.


Thanks. I had a late 90's Lull 4 string Jazz. It was amazing. The bass I'm looking at is active. I'm not thrilled about that, but it's also not a deterrent.
My buddy has an active MV5 and it is fantastic.
 
My buddy has an active MV5 and it is fantastic.

My only active bass at the moment is a Stingray, which will be going up for sale soon. I don't have a dislike for active basses, but I find that I don't use the eq at all. I know there are other benefits, but I'm not sure if that's enough. The fact that it's active isn't a deal killer though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bdgotoh
My only active bass at the moment is a Stingray, which will be going up for sale soon. I don't have a dislike for active basses, but I find that I don't use the eq at all. I know there are other benefits, but I'm not sure if that's enough. The fact that it's active isn't a deal killer though.
Lull active basses have a passive mode, if you pull up on the volume knob on their M5V that is passive. The 4 strings are different, it's the 3rd knob.
 
Stingray is listed. Offer in on an MV5


Lull active basses have a passive mode, if you pull up on the volume knob on their M5V that is passive. The 4 strings are different, it's the 3rd knob.

Good to know. I was going to ask on this thread, but I figured that I wasn't going to walk away based on that. I like everything else about it. The era, the color, the wood combo, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bdgotoh
Hey guys contemplating offering up my nearly new minty 2024 build Lull V4. Arctic white, Roasted Maple neck, Indian Rosewood 34", would consider trades for Lull 5 string or similar.

IMG_8190.jpeg
IMG_8192.jpeg
IMG_8195.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I am hoping for some help. I am looking to convert an active Lull J5 into a passive bass. It has a control plate with 4 knobs and a side jack. I figure that I could keep the side jack and then wire the pickups to be volume, blend, tone, tone. Are there better options? Also, which pots and caps should I look at? I don't mind purchasing a prewired harness if there are good options available.
I want to make sure that everything can be converted back to stock in the future if need be.
 
I am hoping for some help. I am looking to convert an active Lull J5 into a passive bass. It has a control plate with 4 knobs and a side jack. I figure that I could keep the side jack and then wire the pickups to be volume, blend, tone, tone. Are there better options? Also, which pots and caps should I look at? I don't mind purchasing a prewired harness if there are good options available.
I want to make sure that everything can be converted back to stock in the future if need be.
Just in case it helps, have you checked if your bass has already a passive pickup config in it?

In my M5V I get the passive config if I pull on one of the knobs, but I forget which knob...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelloggsy
Thanks for the reply. It has the active passive push/pull pot. One issue is that the pots are pretty dirty and I was thinking about replacing them. Since I was already doing the work, I figured that I might as well go passive. But after playing it for a bit, I may end up keeping it active. It sounds great as is, and I can always play it in passive mode.
Or…maybe I can reverse the switch so down is passive and up is active???
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply. It has the active passive push/pull pot. One issue is that the pots are pretty dirty and I was thinking about replacing them. Since I was already doing the work, I figured that I might as well go passive. But after playing it for a bit, I may end up keeping it active. It sounds great as is, and I can always play it in passive mode.
Or…maybe I can reverse the switch so down is passive and up is active???
Replacing the pots is the best idea.

And wiring the push/pull to operate with passive down would be easy to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyBass
Thanks. I think it's an Aguilar preamp. Volume, blend, mid and stacked bass/treble.
Which pots do you recommend?
Also, do any of the prewired plates fit on the Lulls? If I were to go all out and do an East or Lusithand preamp?
I'm really up in the air on the bass at the moment. I want to spend more time with it and research all options before I do anything. I really like the bass and will eventually take it to a tech to be professionally disassembled, cleaned and set up. It's not disgustingly dirty, but it could use a thorough cleaning.
 
Thanks for the reply. It has the active passive push/pull pot. One issue is that the pots are pretty dirty and I was thinking about replacing them. Since I was already doing the work, I figured that I might as well go passive. But after playing it for a bit, I may end up keeping it active. It sounds great as is, and I can always play it in passive mode.
Or…maybe I can reverse the switch so down is passive and up is active???
You could try cleaning the pots with deoxit, available in Amazon. That's what the electronic techs use when cleaning noisy pots on amps.
 
Does anyone here have an early to mid 2000's Lull P4 Bass. Maybe something with a high 3 digit serial number. I'd love to round out my 'collection' with a nice 4 string P bass. I'm thinking about listing a few basses for sell. But, I'm not sure how easy it would be to find the right bass from the right era.
 
Does anyone here have an early to mid 2000's Lull P4 Bass. Maybe something with a high 3 digit serial number. I'd love to round out my 'collection' with a nice 4 string P bass. I'm thinking about listing a few basses for sell. But, I'm not sure how easy it would be to find the right bass from the right era.
Honestly, there is no "right" era for Lulls. I'd argue that Lull basses just kept getting better and better, as they were able to charge more, refine manufacturing techniques and afford more time to build them. I had Lull #796 and others from 10 years ago or more. Still have #1518, and a couple of post pandemic ones. The new ones are amazing. But there's nothing wrong in finding an old Lull around. It will be amazing as well. Takes a bit of searching, which is kind of fun too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyBass
Honestly, there is no "right" era for Lulls. I'd argue that Lull basses just kept getting better and better, as they were able to charge more, refine manufacturing techniques and afford more time to build them. I had Lull #796 and others from 10 years ago or more. Still have #1518, and a couple of post pandemic ones. The new ones are amazing. But there's nothing wrong in finding an old Lull around. It will be amazing as well. Takes a bit of searching, which is kind of fun too.

Thanks for the reply. I didn't mean to imply that there were 'good' and 'bad' eras. I have no doubt that they are constantly refining their builds. I have a newer Lull J4, so I can see the quality is top notch. Maybe a better wording is how hard would it be to find a 'specific' bass from a 'specific' era? I don't have an issue looking at newer Lulls, but I want to get all the info I can before making any moves and listing my current basses for sale.