• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Rickenbacker Club Part Eight

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here are a couple of pics I took of the 75 when I removed that god forsaken pick up cover. For comparison's sake if nothing else.

Lots of rice krispies from the pots. I think that best answer is to just replace the entire harness. If anyone has any suggestions on someone that does quality harnesses, I would appreciate it.

Here's the tape inside the control cavity.

IMG_2398.jpg



Controls and harness. I am certainly no expert but it looks unmolested to me.

IMG_2399.jpg



And one more question. I noticed that the controls and harness did not have a ground running to the pick up screws. Any idea when Ric started this practice ?
 
Here are a couple of pics I took of the 75 when I removed that god forsaken pick up cover. For comparison's sake if nothing else.

Lots of rice krispies from the pots. I think that best answer is to just replace the entire harness. If anyone has any suggestions on someone that does quality harnesses, I would appreciate it.

Here's the tape inside the control cavity.

IMG_2398.jpg



Controls and harness. I am certainly no expert but it looks unmolested to me.

IMG_2399.jpg



And one more question. I noticed that the controls and harness did not have a ground running to the pick up screws. Any idea when Ric started this practice ?

Get some contact cleaner and clean the pots, I promise you it will sound majorly different if you change the harness...the new ones are different values and it changes the sound of the bass...
 
Get some contact cleaner and clean the pots, I promise you it will sound majorly different if you change the harness...the new ones are different values and it changes the sound of the bass...

I want to avoid changing the sound at all cost. I'll try hitting the pots again with contact cleaner. Worst case, I'll just have to stay off the knobs.
 
Zoomie,

Jaymi is spot on in this aspect, as he is in most things Rickenbacker!

I do have a guy that can build you a harness. He's got a ton of old spare RIC spec parts. As well as NOS caps and pots.

If the cleaner does not work well for you. I'll send you his contact info if you need it.

Sepp
 
If you're looking for those 1970s necks, you'll find the new ones noticeably wider.
Thickness is about the same, not really an issue at all, but the width you will feel right away.

The pickups are definitely much better for really tweaking individual string balance, and the new rods are almost too easy to adjust.

The new 4003s are just about ideal for a 5 string project if you like close string spacing: the headstock is a little bigger and the wider neck allows a more normal string spacing, though it will still be pretty tight.
 
Zoomie,

Jaymi is spot on in this aspect, as he is in most things Rickenbacker!

I do have a guy that can build you a harness. He's got a ton of old spare RIC spec parts. As well as NOS caps and pots.

If the cleaner does not work well for you. I'll send you his contact info if you need it.

Sepp

RIC also sells a pre-wired harness using the current pot values (330k, originally they were 250k). A simple drop in fix, I used this to update my hacked up 1977 4001 (also white).
Here it is: $60 from RIC also usually available from the bigger dealers.
Invalid Link Removed
 
Here are a couple of pics I took of the 75 when I removed that god forsaken pick up cover. For comparison's sake if nothing else.

Lots of rice krispies from the pots. I think that best answer is to just replace the entire harness. If anyone has any suggestions on someone that does quality harnesses, I would appreciate it.

Here's the tape inside the control cavity.

IMG_2398.jpg



Controls and harness. I am certainly no expert but it looks unmolested to me.

IMG_2399.jpg



And one more question. I noticed that the controls and harness did not have a ground running to the pick up screws. Any idea when Ric started this practice ?

That harness is totally rewired, not at all like a Rickenbacker harness. The pickups should go straight to the selector switch with the tone caps tied to the same lugs as their respective pickup. The stock .0047 µF cap for the bridge pickup is missing, along with other things that are different. Basically, it is completely molested.

Here is a stock harness from a July '73 4001 save for the red wire that is bypassing the .0047µF cap.

Photo © Jeffrey P. Scott 2004 All rights reserved.
 
Have a good sappy story here for Ric fans. Posted on my FB page this morning for my family and friends. While I understand that basses are just tools, lots of nostalgia for me as I cut my eye teeth on a Ric.

33 years ago, give or take a few months, I was a guitar player. Well, not so much a guitar player as someone who could mimic the sound of swinging a cat by the tail at great volume. Then one fateful day, I was asked by our bass player if I would be interested in trying to play bass as he wanted to return to drums. He handed me his beloved Rickenbacker. It was an unwieldly beast. Compared to guitar, the strings were like telephone cables. Very uncomfortable to play. And then I plugged it in. And I made thunder ! To say that I fell in love would be an understatement.

Because I was a poor enlisted guy, Dan lent me the mighty Rickenbacker. I was terrified that I was going to scratch it. I was ever vigilant, constantly scanning the crowds of smoky bars, waiting for some drunk hillbilly to fling a beer bottle at the stage. I was fully prepared to take one in the melon to protect Dan's beautiful Ric.

I spent two years playing that bass. One of the darkest days of my life was the day that I got transferred and had to return her. It was crushing. But Dan and I were in love with the same bass and to ask him to give her up would have been unthinkable.

I have thought often of that bass and just as often of Dan. Over the years I have really wanted to find an older Ric. I stumbled over a few here in there, but none of them spoke to me.

Last night one of our guitar players came to practice and handed me a case. He said that he purchased the bass a number of years ago to do some brief recording. Since that time, the bass had adorned the wall of his bedroom. He told me that the bass belonged with me. He told me to take it home and we would work out something at something closer to a gift than a sale.

While I had seen pictures, they paled in comparison to opening the case and seeing the bass in person. I was a little bit surprised at the emotion of it all for me. Lots of memories came flooding back. The days of hanging out with my band mates in a little tiny trailer. We sent an aweful lot of beer to its watery grave. The police may or may not have shown up from time to time. To keep things polite, we played hard, both in life and in the band.

This is a March 1975 Rickenbacker 4001. It is not identical to Dan's bass from a number of perspectives and yet they could be twins in feel and familiarity. She and I are a lot alike. We both show our respective age. We both have some dings, dents, scars and wear. We both have been around the block and have led storied lives from personal perspectives.

Neither one of us are nearly as shiny as we used to be, but together, we make thunder!

__________________________________________________


The bass is in remarkable condition. Original case looks great for it's age.

A few small cracks in the finish at joints. PG is cracked in one spot. Neck is straight as an arrow. Fret wear is observable but plenty of life left. Beautiful yellowing. Mojo for days.

100 % orginal from everything that I see. Interesting that I have seen 75's with neck pick up locations in both spots. Perhaps 75 was the transistion to move the pick up rearward?

Here are some crappy cell pics.

Case is in excellent shape for its age.

IMG_2365.jpg


IMG_2368.jpg


A fews dings here and there. Chrome worn off pu cover and arm wear at edge. Still, looks great.

IMG_2371.jpg


Silk screened.

IMG_2372.jpg


IMG_2374.jpg


IMG_2375.jpg


IMG_2376.jpg


IMG_2382.jpg


IMG_2377.jpg


IMG_2380.jpg


IMG_2379.jpg


Ahhhhhh screammmmm droooooool :eek::D
 
Honestly, it matters that much? :confused::rolleyes:

My "330K" pots from my Bridge pup(volume and tone) both measured around 280K. There probably isn't a huge difference there between that and a 250K pot.

That being said, I swapped my bridge's tone pot for a no-load I made, and swapped my volume one for a 750K, but it will soon be swapped for a 10Meg one instead. I left the Neck pots stock, and typically only dial in that pickup about 25-30%.

That was an audible difference.
 
That harness is totally rewired, not at all like a Rickenbacker harness. The pickups should go straight to the selector switch with the tone caps tied to the same lugs as their respective pickup. The stock .0047 µF cap for the bridge pickup is missing, along with other things that are different. Basically, it is completely molested.

Here is a stock harness from a July '73 4001 save for the red wire that is bypassing the .0047µF cap.

Photo © Jeffrey P. Scott 2004 All rights reserved.

Interesting. I'll go back and look and again as it has to be cleanest rewire that I have ever seen. Not doubting you, just really surprised. No extra solder anywhere, no scarred or marred insulation. No bent ends, etc. I need to meet whomever did this work. It's better than factory.

Well I guess it doesnt really matter how I handle as long as I stick with at minimum how it's wired now. Sounds fantastic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.