As cool as it is to sell 40 pedals in one day, I now need to box and ship 40 pedals. The kids are home from school now, sounds like it's time for child labor.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks, I haven't had any issues running both at the same time, but I've never really had to max both out, but the fact it's an addition to the new release made me at least start to think about possible solutions for if it arose.Correct, the only difference between this run and the last is the buffered 1/4" output, other than that it's the exact same pedal.
My suggestion would be to set your XLR level first then adjust your 1/4" output appropriately. There's nothing wrong with using both outputs on the previous version of Neptunium, it's just that the controls will "fight each other" if you suddenly turn one up and may have to adjust the other as well. So my best recommendation is going to be set your levels before you start the gig so you don't have to adjust anything on the fly.
Using a boost on the 1/4" output could be an option though, so your 1/4" level on the pedal stays where you set it and any adjustments needed on the 1/4" output could be adjusted on the boost.
Can the first run Neptunium be modded to add that buffer?Correct, the only difference between this run and the last is the buffered 1/4" output, other than that it's the exact same pedal.
It should be possible, but it would require a new circuit board design for the add-on buffer and it would require some surgery to add it to the existing board. Doable, but it would take some work. I can take a look at a design early next week and see if I can swing an estimate at what it would cost to do.Can the first run Neptunium be modded to add that buffer?
I've been tempted to sell mine, and would have asked at least what I paid knowing the circumstancesA new batch is good, considering people are reselling Neptuniums for $450+ here and on Reverb.
Did they even use them, or are they just commodities to be bought and resold for profit? It's ridiculous. Go make a buck somewhere else, guys.
was going to ask this, then again Finally V3 is sort of serving a similar roleIt should be possible, but it would require a new circuit board design for the add-on buffer and it would require some surgery to add it to the existing board. Doable, but it would take some work. I can take a look at a design early next week and see if I can swing an estimate at what it would cost to do.
So does this mean there is a draw when power is supplied or any time something is plugged into the input?@Verticos nailed it. Tube life is measured in hours, which means if the pedal is plugged in, that's time against the total life. My typical recommendation is that if you're not going to be playing for a couple hours, probably best to unplug it. If you're on a 15 minute break between sets, leave it plugged in. That being said I will often do tests where I will run a pedal for 24 hours to make sure there aren't any problems that don't show up right away. Other times I plug in my personal pedalboard and forget to unplug it for a few days.
Yes, the circuit is powered up as soon as power is plugged in. I don't switch power based on the input, in my experience that's only done when batteries are involved.So does this mean there is a draw when power is supplied or any time something is plugged into the input?
93 is the atomic number of Neptunium (Np) (it sits between uranium (U) and plutonium (Pu) on the periodic table of elements)It's probably been asked but I missed it... What does all the odd notation inside the Neptunium's Np circle mean?
Hm, does one of those numbers also tell how many units Nathan is going to produce?93 is the atomic number of Neptunium (Np) (it sits between uranium (U) and plutonium (Pu) on the periodic table of elements)
5f4 6d1 7s2 is the shorthand notation for Np's electron configuration (scientifically written as [Rn] 5f4 6d1 7s2)
237 is the most frequently occurring isotope (atomic mass) of neptunium

Of course 93 would seem to be a logical number to build, either now, or as the total production run.Hm, does one of those numbers also tell how many units Nathan is going to produce?
Nah, that's really too nerdy, I guess...
OK, how about 144. The number of neutrons in the nucleus of Np-237.93 is perfect, but given he's already 40 into this run, I feel he's already built that many...
Not that I would have a nice German beer now, but thinking about atom cores makes me think "Island of stability" could be a fitting compressor name...This could be a fun exercise over a few beers.
I was originally thinking of doing 100 because that's how many I did last year, but given how quickly the first 40 went (sold out in 5 hours) I was thinking about bumping it up to 200. Now that you mention it though, it seems pretty reasonable to stretch it to 237.Hm, does one of those numbers also tell how many units Nathan is going to produce?
Nah, that's really too nerdy, I guess...