TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.













Check out "the Emporer Wears no Clothes" by Jack Herer.
Send the book to your sisterI only knew the name Jack Herer as that of a sativa dominant strain of cannabis. I had no idea the strain was named after an author. I would imagine that a lot of the Latino kids working in Cali cannabis clubs are likewise in the dark as to this etymology.
Thanks for making me a little smarter...if not more stoned.
Yet there it is, on the big screen in 1929.1931 was not the first time it entered the US lexicon, it was the first time it was used broadly in a mass-market way to vilify cannabis.
Again, cannabis, weed, whatever you call it, was legal in the US and elsewhere until the 30s, when Anslinger amd others started using the word marijuana to associate it with undesirable social elements, stigmatize it, and criminalize it.
It was known by many slang names, but marijuana was not used widely in the American lexicon in association with it. It was mostly used by immigrants, hipsters, entertainers and the like seen as undesirables by the political and social mainstream.
The earliest known Western use of the term seems to be from 1894.
Perhaps all true and accurate but none of it means the word "marijuana" is racist, which is the title of the thread.Well, I doubt that there's a "smoking gun"paper that declares as such a plan that was enacted, but given the mood of the times (immigrants taking jobs, the Depression, etc) anti-immigrant attitudes were prevalent, and easily manipulated to achieve the desired results.
The flagrantly racist comments of the participants involved, including sitting members of Congress as well as Anslinger, Hearst, DuPont, etc. definitely indicate that a pro-America, pro-Caucasian bent was in place, and immigrants/jazz musicians/undesirables were demonized in a conscious effort to further criminalization.
Add in the corporate interests/profit motives of the corporate interests involved, and it was a pretty simple job of distracting the people with a "new threat to our values" and "foreign ways equal the Devil in disguise" in order to make it illegal.
Of course, the Hearst's investments in news papers and paper farms, the DuPonts patent on Nylon, the pharmaceutical investments in patentable medicines, the US Currency protectionists, etc. only fueled the fires of criminalization.
Also interesting that after criminalization in 1937, there was no more hemp for ropes, parachutes, etc,. and things got so bad that hemp was re-leagalized in 1942 to aid the war effort... After the war, criminal again.
Perhaps all true and accurate but none of it means the word "marijuana" is racist, which is the title of the thread.
IIRC, Herer was jailed for drugs, and used his time in the clink to research the reasons he was there. Lots of interesting legal documents, Congressional records and reports, hearsay and BS in there, but mostly straight, honest info with a few deviations from fact. Worth a read for sure, if interested.
The Emperor Wears No Clothes: Hemp and the Marijuana Conspiracy: Jack Herer, Leslie Cabarga, Jeannie Herer, Roland A. Duby: 9781878125026: Amazon.com: Books
Medical Cannabis "research" in the US is fundamentally flawed.I tried a get a prescription from my doctor, but he was dead against it, and went on to tell me he was involved with studies about what cannabis does to the brain. He claims places where it's now legal are going to regret it.