I'm sure Ritter makes great instruments (I think he was an engineer) but the fact that he puts jewelry into a bass and gets spots on display in Washington DC (or someplace like that) over some Alembic or Spector or old BC Rich is absurd. Any of those companies have had infinitely more impact on the world of music that a bass with a few rich women's wedding rings in them.
If I put a Ferrari into a Pbass does that make me awesome? No (other than logistically figure out how to do that).
Ritter has cool finishes. They are cool ideas but nothing compared to the company's I mentioned (and others too).
Oh come on. Jens Ritter's basses are just as much a work of art as they are musical instruments. Modern painters get exhibitions in art galleries, why shouldn't Mr Ritter? He puts a lot of time and effort into his work and he makes creations of beauty.
That doesn't mean they play better than an Alembic (for example) but he certainly deserves just as much attention as they do, even if it is for different reasons.
For what it's worth, I would probably rather own a Ritter than an Alembic, and I would definitely rather own one than a BC Rich!