Both, but get a teacher so that they can point out which one you need more help in. You should never neglect one to practise the other, but sometimes one may advance quicker than the other.
Leigh
Leigh
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
fraublugher said:it takes 10,000 hours to learn how to play well.
it takes an extra 10,000 hours to learn how play an unfixed pitch instrument well.
repertoire -add another 10,000 hours
theory -another 10,000
somewhere in there you'll find some bad habits regarding your technique , unless you get a qualified teacher [hopefully for your sake a bassist]
then again maybe im a slow learner![]()
Oh no. I started using hyphens and semicolons, and now the sky's the limit!Ozzyman said:...that's gotta be the longest sentence ever)
I learnt theory first, then technique.haythamehab said:which is better or let me repharse that ....At the early stages of your playing which is better ??
haythamehab said:my biggest problem is that i'm willing to practice 24/7 but dunno whta to practice ...i'm really confused ...Have you been confused on ur early stages??
haythamehab said:my biggest problem is that i'm willing to practice 24/7 but dunno whta to practice ...i'm really confused ...Have you been confused on ur early stages??