TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Why wouldn't Blazing Saddles be politically correct?
Blazing Saddles is available right now on at least a half dozen platforms, as well as the Sundance channel.There is essentially nothing in Blazing Saddles that can pass the review of the pecksniffians.
There are many people in our country who are continually looking for an opportunity to be offended at something; anything. Blazing Saddles offers a smorgasboard of offenses.
Blazing Saddles is available right now on at least a half dozen platforms, as well as the Sundance channel.
There are already-produced movies that are in fact very hard to find, because they go far beyond Blazing Saddles in how they traffic in racist stereotypes. Birth of a Nation is one example, and Disney has clamped down on things like Song of the South (mentioned earlier in this thread).Of course it is, because it was already produced.
Today you couldn't get it produced anywhere, you couldn't get the finances. It is totally impossible to get a project like that produced today. Mel Brooks has said as much more than once.

There are already-produced movies that are in fact very hard to find, because they go far beyond Blazing Saddles in how they traffic in racist stereotypes. Birth of a Nation is one example, and Disney has clamped down on things like Song of the South (mentioned earlier in this thread).
Also, movies with white people saying *that* word, for example, are still getting made. Django Unchained is an obvious one. I love Mel Brooks, but I disagree with him on this.
I'm getting so tired of the misplaced moaning about "PC" and "being offended." It pretty much all seems to come from the same demographic.
As I pointed out, though, controversial movies are still being made. Django Unchained was a clear hit. "Pointed comedy that points out issues that make us uncomfortable"? Check out the new Borat movie, it's plenty transgressive. And Amazon says tens of millions watched it opening weekend.Personally, I'm not moaning about it. I'd love to see more movies like Blazing Saddles produced. I don't think we change anything by hiding pointed comedy that points out issues that make us uncomfortable.
One thing I've learned from supervising people is that every person has a hot button, and much of the time the other person's hot button is something you personally don't care about and would never have suspected was a big deal to them. Therefore, by definition, you can't make a movie that doesn't hit any hot buttons if everybody has one. Where does that leave us? Maybe with nothing but Disney princesses and rom-com movies.
I'd rather that movies were made with controversial figures and biting satire in them, and let the box office determine whether that was a good idea or not.
At this point, it seems to me that this conversation could overlap into "trigger warnings," which is something I have very mixed feelings about. As a product of the 60's, I thought we were making the American dialogue more open to controversial thought and challenging people's comfort levels, especially on the university campuses where I spent nearly 40 years of my career. I think the same kind of thinking that makes satirical movies hard to make is also constraining conversation at universities - which is something I do not support from either end of the left-right political continuum. But that may be heading into a dead end.
It would seem that, more and more, well-reasoned dialogue is out in favour of emotional reasoning and dogma. Very sad.Personally, I'm not moaning about it. I'd love to see more movies like Blazing Saddles produced. I don't think we change anything by hiding pointed comedy that points out issues that make us uncomfortable.
One thing I've learned from supervising people is that every person has a hot button, and much of the time the other person's hot button is something you personally don't care about and would never have suspected was a big deal to them. Therefore, by definition, you can't make a movie that doesn't hit any hot buttons if everybody has one. Where does that leave us? Maybe with nothing but Disney princesses and rom-com movies.
I'd rather that movies were made with controversial figures and biting satire in them, and let the box office determine whether that was a good idea or not.
At this point, it seems to me that this conversation could overlap into "trigger warnings," which is something I have very mixed feelings about. As a product of the 60's, I thought we were making the American dialogue more open to controversial thought and challenging people's comfort levels, especially on the university campuses where I spent nearly 40 years of my career. I think the same kind of thinking that makes satirical movies hard to make is also constraining conversation at universities - which is something I do not support from either end of the left-right political continuum. But that may be heading into a dead end.
There are already-produced movies that are in fact very hard to find, because they go far beyond Blazing Saddles in how they traffic in racist stereotypes. Birth of a Nation is one example, and Disney has clamped down on things like Song of the South (mentioned earlier in this thread).
Also, movies with white people saying *that* word, for example, are still getting made. Django Unchained is an obvious one. I love Mel Brooks, but I disagree with him on this.
I'm getting so tired of the misplaced moaning about "PC" and "being offended." It pretty much all seems to come from the same demographic.
nothing but Disney princesses and rom-com movies.