hybrids are no scam. they do sound better than plain ss heads imho, so they're no scam. now if they make the tube a glorified pilot light, then it's a scam. but most makers actually do something useful with it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
no, it's a sales thing. they want a cheap tube head for those who want tubes but don't want to drop $1900 on a vr, and smarvo licenses their design to eden and eden tweaks it slightly.Loud/noisy punky shoegazey band, and me playing through 3x15s or 2x15+6x10.
Good to know JimmyM, thanks, i'll look into it! Out of curiosity... why does/can Eden market the same design? Is it a distribution thing?
No disrespect intended, but his completely and totally misses the point of what people like in tube amps. It's all about the tube power stage- that's why those tubes are so much bigger than the little 12ax7s in the pre. A hybrid amp is really a compromise, it just doesn't do what a great tube amp does.
Here's my advice: I have gigged for 10 years with all tube bass gear (specifically, a Trace Elliot V6) and it has never, ever failed on stage. I've had it re-tubed once and it was expensive, but I'm willing to shell out a little for tone. It's heavy, but I'm willing to grunt a little to get the sound I want.
There are tons of old Ampegs, Hiwatts and Sunns floating around that are still running after 40 years because they were made well. They weren't pieces of plastic with circuit boards slapped together in China. So my advice would to consider that: don't necessarily opt for a more recent amp because chances are it was manufactured to today's standards, which are pretty shoddy.
Mesa 400+ : DAMN. I liked it a LOT. I was gonna post the SAME thing a few posts before said though... i wasn't really able to crank it though, but still at the low/mid volume it sounded sweet through an ampeg 4x10 (which i tried everything through). The new price is a bit outta range, i'll zip to ebay eventually and see what the used prices look like. My caveat with it though, is that... thems a LOT a tubes in there. I know how i am. I know how i tour, where i play, etc etc... all i could think about was; more tubes, more things to break, more cost. That was the only Mesa tube head they had... are there others that replicate the same tone, but with less tubes/breakable parts? How sturdy are these with a road case?
Please don't make the mistake of lecturing me about tube amps. I've been building them since I was in my teens. Until the late seventies I used only tube amps. the later ones were my designs. I simply consider a SS output stage a more logical and elegant thing but I do like to have a tube in the chain somewhere.
I also made no comment about reliability. A well designed tube output stage should be as reliable as a well designed SS one. the problems start when you try to get every last watt out of a set of tubes. Running anything at its limits will lead to problems sooner or later. I personally prefer to get 300W via an octet of KT88s. They last longer that way.
if toting a tube amp fullfils your needs more power to you. For me it's a case of been there, done that and no thanks, not anymore.
Paul
The last thing I'd like to say is that I've heard Mesa amps LOVE interacting with effects, ampegs work well with them I'm sure, I just had more fun with effects on my sound with the mesa than an svt-2pro and I've heard others comment on this.
what could possibly be the difference about how effects interact?
Please don't make the mistake of lecturing me about tube amps. I've been building them since I was in my teens. Until the late seventies I used only tube amps. the later ones were my designs. I simply consider a SS output stage a more logical and elegant thing but I do like to have a tube in the chain somewhere.
I also made no comment about reliability. A well designed tube output stage should be as reliable as a well designed SS one. the problems start when you try to get every last watt out of a set of tubes. Running anything at its limits will lead to problems sooner or later. I personally prefer to get 300W via an octet of KT88s. They last longer that way.
if toting a tube amp fullfils your needs more power to you. For me it's a case of been there, done that and no thanks, not anymore.
Paul
Why don't you get a combination (hybrid)? You have a GK 400rb and so you probably know what to expect from a GK amp...why not try their Fusion 550? Heard its really been pleasing the tube snobs out there. Like 900 bucks new I think? Easily in your budget. Also, don't be fooled by the "mere" 500 watts output...Tom B. of bass gear says that the Fusion performed more like an 800 watt amp on burst runs? Definitely look in to it.

True story. That Fusion 550 is a beast, and it sounds fantastic, IMHO.![]()
So from the testing... my top pickes were:
1. Ampeg VR (OMG SO GOOD, so expensive :scowl
2. Mesa 400+ (i wince at the seeming destructability though)
3. Traynor YBA-200 (do like!)
4. Peavey Tour VB-2 (need to look into it more)
5. Eden 300T (also needs more investigation)
This 'jump to tubes' has been SUPER fun so far! I really want to find a Fender 300T... so if anyone in the DC/MD area knows of a place that sells them, please let me know!
Keep the reccomendations coming!![]()
It may be out of your price range, but if you ever get a chance to hear a Reeves Custom 225, you really, really should give it a go. This is one of my all-time favorite tube heads, though it's mostly a clean machine.
No disrespect either but I'll put my 28 years of giging tube amps up against your 10. It is true most Hybrids are just not done well, but some are. To just try one or two poor examples is not the way to form a reasonable opinion. Going on 42 years playing myself.![]()
so i just had a friend nonchalantly suggested, "Dude, just get a Fender 400PS".
IF ONLY IT WERE THAT EASY :scowl: