• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thoughts on the bass "over-player"

I had an idea for a thread here this weekend after watching a local band doing the usual range of covers.

are you the

1. Bassist that generally sticks very closely to the original records?
2. Bassist that adds in constant flourishes in every turnaround - stuff not on the recordings after seemingly every 8 measures in a standard song, wildly going up and down the fret board as if you were playing a sort of lead guitar?
3. Bassist who stays down in the mix, and keeps it simple and in the pocket, no matter what the bassist on the original is doing? Eg, I can dumb-down a song, and by keeping my tone heavy on the bottom-end, "nobody will know the difference."
4. Bassist some combination of the above, depending on the song and/or band circumstance?

Why did I post this? I got a inquiry off FB from a local band who was seeking to replace their bassist and told me they were looking for someone who doesn't "overplay the songs". Who "leaves spaces" during transitions.

And then I go see this guy in this band - very super-talented, but literally adding stuff all over the place not in the song. Seemingly every turn-around and transition he was adding stuff -- fancy picking. Slapping. going way way down the fret board to play super high note transitions.

So thoughts on this? I have to say - while he was impressive and talented, after a while I found it hard to listen to. Annoying. Like the guy was just showing off instead of hanging back, and as the one band said, "leaves spaces in the songs." is it a frustrated guitarist doing that? Someone who is simply bored with the songs and can't help himself? Wants to make sure everyone knows he's playing? Or or or?

as one article said, "WHY THE BAND IS FRUSTRATED WITH YOU
The main reason everyone else in the band gets frustrated with you is simple: you’re too busy trying to come up with more interesting things to play and are losing sight of what it means to be a bass player. Anything too fancy that you play will distract from your primary job. Guitar is cool, isn’t it? They get to play fancy fast stuff and they get all the attention. The keyboard player has all sorts of crazy sounds, and nothing is quite as cool as the drums. Each instrument plays a specific role in the band, including you. Your job is to be the bridge between the drums and everyone else in the band. Drums are, by their nature, rhythmic. They don’t provide much in the harmonic department. (Drummers, I know, I know, you guys tune your drums. You know what I mean though.) Everyone else’s duties in the band are primarily harmonic. Sure, there are rhythms that they play, but nothing as rhythmic as drums. Your job is to be the bridge between these two, the glue that holds them together. By locking in with the drummer, you are providing some harmonic structure to the rhythms he’s laying down. This unifies the whole band and makes it sound like you’re actually playing together. Once you embrace your role as the glue, the bridge between the two halves of the band, you’ll find yourself thinking differently, playing differently, and the whole band sounding tighter."

Eg, bassist, restrain thyself.

Doug Pinnick from King’s X sees it this way: “If the bass player can’t find the groove, it’s because he’s thinking ‘guitar.’ Guitarist-bass players tend to overplay and have no concept of the true reason we play bass. The bass dictates the groove and the feel.” Phil Chen, bassist for Jeff Beck, Rod Stewart and countless others says, “Bass is a foundation instrument, like the foundation of a house.” Chen advises players to “replicate the low frequency of the bass drum.” Ellefson sums it up this way, “It’s called a bass, not a treble, so please play it like one.”

as for me? I think I'm more #1, and occasionally, just occasionally, I add in some transition that I may have found on some live version. but I rarely make stuff up and add in my own transition bits. I'm more the pocket guy who tries to stick as close the original (or live) recording of the well known song. Not saying one is better than the other - some bands want the super-fancy bassist, throwing in little runs all over the place, to fill in the gaps. Some bands want you to LEAVE the gaps and stick to the original.

One man's "over-player" is another man's "talented, beautifully melodic and creative bass player who is adding significantly to the dynamics, melody and complexity of the tune."

thoughts?

I'm the "Bassist that generally sticks very closely to the original records" type. Maybe it's because I'm just too lazy to be bothered to add anything more, or it could be my 10 years playing roots reggae, setting the meditative groundation for the music and taking pains NOT to add anything more than was required to make that happen. Either way, over playing, whatever that means, was never my thing.
 
I embellish these days because most of the folks I gig with won't really solo. They are always telling me to take a bass solo. I tell them, no one really wants to hear a bass solo, even other bass players. I'm exaggerating of course.

Now, if someone is paying me, I'll play how and whatever they want.
 
sf.PNG
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassGuyFL
"It's not just bass players. it's any potential player in a band. All of us....guitar players, drummers, keys, singers etc...there is a fine line between being expressive and showing talent within the context of the music vs. overplaying and killing songs. I suppose some players just haven't figured out what their role is in a band."
 
I am #1 possibly to be the point of obsession, at least for tunes I care about. I'll listen to the song, check all the tabs, check all the live performances, and then usually listen to the tune in software, slowing it down, looping it, using a spectrum analyzer, etc, until I feel like I've literally got the exact correct score.
 
then there's the "root-note guys"....I dunno. seems like the consensus is that most of us that play covers are mostly #1, but on occasion, #3 in limited quantities, but don't want to bother to even try to be #2. and in fact, find the "consistently #2 guys" kinda annoying. lol
 
I am #1 possibly to be the point of obsession, at least for tunes I care about. I'll listen to the song, check all the tabs, check all the live performances, and then usually listen to the tune in software, slowing it down, looping it, using a spectrum analyzer, etc, until I feel like I've literally got the exact correct score.

I think for me, I tend to agree. i will obsess over accuracy, but love checking out live recordings by the same guy/group to see if there's something different that I can use.
 
There's a place for playing like that...it's during a full-on bass solo...but in most bands/for most songs, bass solos should, frankly, be few and far between.

I'm a huge fan of Deep Purple, and if I were to be in a band that covered Purple tunes, I can think of exactly one bass solo I'd play: The short, sweet, and tasteful one that Glover steps out with on "Pictures of Home"...otherwise, I'd play his lines exactly as they are, or at least as close as I could get (I find a lot of Roger Glover's playing sounds kind of easy, then I try to play his stuff, and I'm like "Ddduuurrrr..." :unsure:)

I have all the respect in the world for those super-technicians who have devoted the time and practice to learn every technique and fancy trick under the sun, but unless the song calls for it, a player should be very sparing with that stuff.

One of the most basic, yet important, concepts in music (and not even bass lines specifically), is to leave space and allow the music to BREATHE...:facepalm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wisebass and QORC
I play in cover bands and try to stick to the original bass lines, though I'm not slavish about it. I'm definitely not crazy about over-players, but dumbed-down versions can be just as bad. I do think that unless you're in a strict tribute band striving to exactly recreate a record, there should be some room to inject your own musical personality into the songs you play.
 
Overplayers are bad for the music, regardless of instrument - unless the music calls for it (and even then you're not overplaying, it's just that the song calls for "outrageous").

I remember seeing a jazz/fusion gig (Mike Stern maybe?) with Dennis Chambers, and at some point the guy was turning every other bar into a mini drum solo. It was amazing but got old in a while. Saw Chambers again on another gig where he was just building a superdeep groove and that was all kinds of amazing.
 
The main ingredient to a good bass line:

1. It serves the song

The amount of “flashiness” one uses during the course of a song should always be dependent on that.

If the song calls for it, go crazy and fly all over the neck if you so desire. But, be mindful, know your limitations, and ensure everything you do has a purpose that serves the song.

Otherwise, you’re just making noise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GrapeBass
I'm all for playing just the part on the record, provided I don't actually have to transcribe it and play it note-for-note the same every time. Most of the bass parts I've played in my career were partly improvised anyway.

That said, I've been that guy who overplayed, but I got over that virus. Now I mostly play jazz so I can improvise 85% of what I play. On other gigs, I've always kept it simple with the money notes.