TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm narrowing it down to the thing we're talking about, but yeah, there could be more than one reason that a dance band isn't getting people on the dance floor. A terrible drummer will empty the floor as quick (maybe quicker than?) an incompetent (or overly competent) bass player.You might be in the wrong band.
I do like the idea that you can narrow down why people aren't dancing to one thing. Couldn't be poor song selection or any other number of issues, it must be the busy bassplayer. Couldn't be that the other musicians can't hang with him. And so on.
![]()
I can only criticize those who play worse than me. That number remains in single digits.
Have and always will remain in awe of fantastic technical players, especially those who play within the context of the performance.
Played with a bunch of Berklee and GIT attendees and grads throughout my band life- mostly 25 years hence...I was pleased as a musician to at least jam with every one of them, fortunate to be in a group with a few and blessed to make significant music with two- being pushed musically by these guys was ALWAYS a plus even if the guitar player copped a few Autumn Leaves runs in the middle of a Poison song![]()
I'm narrowing it down to the thing we're talking about, but yeah, there could be more than one reason that a dance band isn't getting people on the dance floor. A terrible drummer will empty the floor as quick (maybe quicker than?) an incompetent (or overly competent) bass player.
In total agreement that busy does not =bad.
Probably the guys that drew me in to bass ( Lee, Squire, Harris, Butler, Claypool) would at times ALL be considered busy.
The issue really comes down to a player, their taste and awareness of the big pic.
As has been mentioned throughout this thread, there are performances filled with incredible playing by talented guys, famous and unknown that can go to either side of this argument.
And I am only semi kidding about my playing; there are at least 100
players out there I can smoke
Yes, we can criticize any level- as a new member, and part time bassist now looking to "get real" on bass- honesty is probably my best route to improving ;-)
In total agreement that busy does not =bad.
Probably the guys that drew me in to bass( Lee,
It depends. I don’t mind flashy playing if it suits the song. For covers I tend to play pretty close to the original song though. Over the years I’ve recorded a lot of originals music with different bands and sometimes an entire song was just three notes. Like this
Song the verse is literally E,C,D and the chorus is C,D,E. Super simple.
sometimes i play what are essentially bass solos in the middle of a song. For example on this song if you listen around the 2:00 mark it’s basically a simple bass solo all above the 12th fret.
For covers like I said I tend to stay pretty close to the original. Sometimes things are changed to suit the singer. For example this song is played in a different key than the cranberries version and a little faster but the basslines are otherwise unchanged for most of the song.
If you have any questions about where I stand on the issue of over playing, please refer to my signature.
I also will paraphrase what a very wise and funky man once said regarding the bass, "if you don't feel the note don't play it."
He may or may not have also said, "always play on the one and don't fake the funk."
I used to be the overplayer, adding fills and flourishes all over cover tunes. With maturity came wisdom and so, if I play covers now, I try to stick to the original parts unless the band is drastically rearranging it.
Now that I play mainly originals, I play whatever the F I feel like playing. Hold down the bottom, lock in with the drums (including fills), doubling some tasty runs with the guitarist, playing fills where I think they ought to be... way more fun to come up with your own parts than copying someone else's.
YMMV.
That's me... Just because you know a lot of theory and scales doesn't mean that you should run all over a great classic song just to show off your chops to everyone.I'm more the pocket guy who tries to stick as close the original (or live) recording of the well known song.
That's me... Just because you know a lot of theory and scales doesn't mean that you should run all over a great classic song just to show off your chops to everyone.
I can honestly say that I never really tried to copy a lot of songs note for note, but I do like to lock down a groove with the drummer and keep room open in the song for lead or keyboard to embellish changes when it "feels right". If I'm not feeling the music more than just playing music then why bother...![]()
Well, if you're in a tribute band... yes?I find the same to be no less true with covers.
I know people who'd complain if you didn't play a P bass on a song recorded with a P bass. I find those people to be ridiculous. What I'm holding isn't as important as what I'm doing with it. What's next... match the outfit on the cover?
;(
It doesn't matter how you try to legitimize the "serve the song" BS, it's still opinion. What you see as excess, they see as appropriate.
Well, if you're in a tribute band... yes?