• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I'm mostly immune to neck size, but my 2 NR's are more Jazz-like than Pbass like. Probably the best neck I have ever used was the Tony Franklin Pbass, and it was smack dab in the middle of a jazz and pbass.

So smack dab in the middle is my final answer.



Might be why I ike birds and Ric's



I think I'm heading toward single pickups, so they gotta be good, even considering volume only.



anytime you are in the neighborhood we got a Genz-Benz/Yorkville stack, a pot of beans on the fire, 2 NR's and a couch to sleep on.
TY. My 76 y/o, somewhat arthritic hands are quite sensitive to changes in neck dimensions. Even the 67 gets a bit tiring by the end of the 3rd set. And tomorrow night's gig is 4 hours.:(
 
My '64 has utterly spoiled me................... None of the others are bad, they're just not the '64 neck. Without a doubt it's the best neck I've ever played.
Indeed. The sound ain't bad on those either.;) I must say that my '06 has the same feel, just not the age and smoothness that age can bring. It very nearly feels the same.

This is why my '64 is the gold standard in feel and tone. Nothing compares. Which explains why I had such a difficult time adjusting to the sound of the '06. (Until one plays the deal deal, explaining it misses a lot.) The '06 felt like a Thunderbird to me, but didn't sound like one (the gold standard I had known for decades). There's a poor analogy regarding true love and infatuation. Infatuation can certainly be fun and have its place, but it's no substitute for true love. Better analogies might get banned!
 
yep, NOTHING plays (or sounds) like a 60’s Bird…
upload_2022-4-21_8-24-13.jpeg
 
I use a filter - on whenever I play. It's subtle, but makes a difference.

View attachment 4665754

I have a gig coming up in a month on a notoriusly boomy stage and just realized this pedal will make my (and others) life there much easier.
I had the HPF at 80hz at the rehearsal space and it really helped with the room sound. Even if I dimed the Hiwatt's bass knob (it's usually at 11 or 12).
At home to the headphones to my usual cab sim setup I didn't need to set is as high at all (40 hz was fine) but it definitely is better to locate after the octave pedal than before it. The octaver needs all the frequencies to track better and HPF after it makes it sound tighter.

The LPF works fine too but I really doubt that I would use it (the whole pedal) as an alternative to a cab sim, especially if there's an overdrive in the chain. That needs a more complex EQ curve (i.e. the cabinet or a virtual "copy" of it) when going direct.
 
Last edited:
What is the neck like on your 1964 compared to your 2006?
Just noticed after the previous post--but nearly identical. Gibson did a great job on that bass. It would be perfection had the used the "correct" PUP spacing and tried to get PUPs that sounded more vintage. The TB+ do not. Only a problem if that's what one is used to hearing. Clearly people do get them to sound good and like them, they just don't sound like a vintage Thunderbird. Feel-wise my '06 is simply superb. I can't find a flaw in that respect.
 
Just noticed after the previous post--but nearly identical. Gibson did a great job on that bass. It would be perfection had the used the "correct" PUP spacing and tried to get PUPs that sounded more vintage. The TB+ do not. Only a problem if that's what one is used to hearing. Clearly people do get them to sound good and like them, they just don't sound like a vintage Thunderbird. Feel-wise my '06 is simply superb. I can't find a flaw in that respect.
And still you're not replacing the TB+ with Thunderbuckers or something? Seems like it would be near perfection there, then.
 
Just noticed after the previous post--but nearly identical. Gibson did a great job on that bass. It would be perfection had the used the "correct" PUP spacing and tried to get PUPs that sounded more vintage. The TB+ do not. Only a problem if that's what one is used to hearing. Clearly people do get them to sound good and like them, they just don't sound like a vintage Thunderbird. Feel-wise my '06 is simply superb. I can't find a flaw in that respect.

I've yet to play one. Hopefully someday I'll get a chance so I can feel/hear the differences.
 
The first is selling the best part! You could make that into whatever you wanted if the price was right and it had no issues. "Why?" is the big question.
The second seems a good deal, but the pics may help or make it worse looking. Glad I held out for the Burgundy.
Ridiculous price for the husk, go for the complete bass.
 
Someone likely chimed in, but...
"The Great Blizzard of 1978 was a historic winter storm that struck the Ohio Valley and Great Lakes regions of the United States as well as Southern Ontario in Canada from Wednesday, January 25 through Friday, January 27, 1978. It is often cited as one of the most severe blizzards in US history."
I remember this vividly.
 
TY. My 76 y/o, somewhat arthritic hands are quite sensitive to changes in neck dimensions. Even the 67 gets a bit tiring by the end of the 3rd set. And tomorrow night's gig is 4 hours.:(

If you are refinishing, but even if you aren't neck shapes can be changed.

I don't know why peepholes are so scared of this.....

it's only wood and wire...
 
We had one weather guy (of four at the time) who said it was going to be bad. Everyone else was saying several inches, but he said "it's going to be bad." He was right.


I remember that afternoon leaving my house looking at the sky knowing something was up, you could see that a bad storm was coming. I left in my '62 Dodge Dart with no snow tires, got stuck near the lead singer's house in Worcester, Ma and stayed there for a few days.
 
I have a gig coming up in a month on a notoriusly boomy stage and just realized this pedal will make my (and others) life there much easier.
I had the HPF at 80hz at the rehearsal space and it really helped with the room sound. Even if I dimed the Hiwatt's bass knob (it's usually at 11 or 12).
At home to the headphones to my usual cab sim setup I didn't need to set is as high at all (40 hz was fine) but it definitely is better to locate after the octave pedal than before it. The octaver needs all the frequencies to track better and HPF after it makes it sound tighter.

The LPF works fine too but I really doubt that I would use it (the whole pedal) as an alternative to a cab sim, especially if there's an overdrive in the chain. That needs a more complex EQ curve (i.e. the cabinet or a virtual "copy" of it) when going direct.
Same here with my HPF. For some reason, at our practice space I get a really boomy low A that really bothers me. One of the guitarists said the same thing for himself after I mentioned it. The past two practices I've had the HPF set to about 80 as well and it really cleans up that boom.
 
And still you're not replacing the TB+ with Thunderbuckers or something? Seems like it would be near perfection there, then.
It would, and that may yet happen. But I really don't want to get into changing all the black hardware out on it-- but I'm sure someone could make black PUP covers. Then there is the PUP placement.... PUPs would make a difference, but there's no addressing the placement issue. Right now I'm enjoying the LaBella black nylons. That gives it a different sound instead of trying to mimic the '64. I may even sell it at some point now that I bought the NR. Seems like I would recover my cost and then some given current prices. But I'm going to hang onto it for now. I've bought a bass and sold one to feel better about not having too many and regretted doing so. If I find that I'm just not playing it (plays so good I can't picture that), I may considering letting it go.
 

Latest posts