Gaolee
Official leathers tester and crash dummy
Maybe it needs Lulls.The pickup from Scott's '21 NR cured mine, there's hope!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Maybe it needs Lulls.The pickup from Scott's '21 NR cured mine, there's hope!
Not sure anyone brought him up yet, but Tom Petersson of Cheap Trick plays a 1967 Gibson Thunderbird all over the first album.
He eventually moved on to those 12 string basses.
Pickups, stings, pickup location or any /all of those just don't seem quite right on the VP. It is a good bass guitar, but I seem to be immune to its spell. It just doesn't have the bottom end the rest of 'em have. Heresy!
Here is a PDF of all the measurements I collected.I keep getting a message that I’ve been blocked every time I try to update the pickup measurement list. Not sure why, not even sure this message will post. The one time I’m not doing anything bad and I get put in time out, go figure.
edit: well that posted ok, so it must be some sql code or other issue with the pup spacing list.
Are those American weeks or Canadian weeks? Canadian weeks are a couple of years long...If you want to borrow the '89 for a two week test drive just let me know.
Could neck through or set neck be the cause of different pickup placement?I don’t know, but I suspect that the LP and 335 don’t suffer from the floating pickup syndrome
Not sure anyone brought him up yet, but Tom Petersson of Cheap Trick plays a 1967 Gibson Thunderbird all over the first album.
He eventually moved on to those 12 string basses.
Not sure anyone brought him up yet, but Tom Petersson of Cheap Trick plays a 1967 Gibson Thunderbird all over the first album.
He eventually moved on to those 12 string basses.
All very true, and I completely agree. The point I am making, or trying to make, is that's it's something of a head-scratcher that The tone that made Thunderbirds Thunderbirds and put them on the sonic historical map is ignored. I know people like the sound of other versions, but no one I know who (or read of) has owned or spent time with a 60s version preferred, not just liked or enjoyed, but preferred the more modern iterations. Clearly there are no doubt some, but would seem to be the exception not the rule. That too is purely subjective, but there just seems to be a pattern that the 60s versions are more sought after for their tone, not just their vintage. No one is grabbing a new a Thunderbird and saying that it's got some magic, that once played is noticed and understood, but that is true of the 60s. And with the VPs nearing that sonic area (and are regularly out of stock), it's just curious to wonder why Gibson isn't even interested in trying to capture the sound that made Thunderbirds so beloved in the first place. (LPs have their versions, but they don't dare move the PU locations one little bit as far as I know, or change the pickups too far from what people have expected all these years.) It's a thinking process thing that I don't get. I know they haven't claimed to replicate the 60s versions, but I'm curious as to why they would not be interested in doing so. I'm fascinated by how people make decisions and this fits that fascination, that's all. That said, I've come to love my '06. It has its own sound which now works for me just fine, and plays every bit as well as the '64.But as we've discussed, no one's said Gibson is going for a '60s tone with the current ones. Tone is all subjective.
And for good reason.I don’t know, but I suspect that the LP and 335 don’t suffer from the floating pickup syndrome
I don't go after the angry piano tone, or anything else "iconic" about my 67 NR. I like the way it feels and the abundance of tones I can get with simple adjustments of the tone knob once I've set my amp's EQ to the room I'm in. And all that with flats and without using the 'superfluous' pup.All very true, and I completely agree. The point I am making, or trying to make, is that's it's something of a head-scratcher that The tone that made Thunderbirds Thunderbirds and put them on the sonic historical map is ignored. I know people like the sound of other versions, but no one I know who (or read of) has owned or spent time with a 60s version preferred, not just liked or enjoyed, but preferred the more modern iterations. Clearly there are no doubt some, but would seem to be the exception not the rule. That too is purely subjective, but there just seems to be a pattern that the 60s versions are more sought after for their tone, not just their vintage. No one is grabbing a new a Thunderbird and saying that it's got some magic, that once played is noticed and understood, but that is true of the 60s. And with the VPs nearing that sonic area (and are regularly out of stock), it's just curious to wonder why Gibson isn't even interested in trying to capture the sound that made Thunderbirds so beloved in the first place. (LPs have their versions, but they don't dare move the PU locations one little bit as far as I know, or change the pickups too far from what people have expected all these years.) It's a thinking process thing that I don't get. I know they haven't claimed to replicate the 60s versions, but I'm curious as to why they would not be interested in doing so. I'm fascinated by how people make decisions and this fits that fascination, that's all. That said, I've come to love my '06. It has its own sound which now works for me just fine, and plays every bit as well as the '64.
Winter or summer weeks?Are those American weeks or Canadian weeks? Canadian weeks are a couple of years long...
I don't go after the angry piano tone, or anything else "iconic" about my 67 NR. I like the way it feels and the abundance of tones I can get with simple adjustments of the tone knob once I've set my amp's EQ to the room I'm in. And all that with flats and without using the 'superfluous' pup.
I'd like to get a 2021 NR so I could semi-retire the 67. Maybe 'one o' these days'. For now, due to having a chronic case of the Italian condition*, I'll just hafta muddle through playing this old thing:
View attachment 4729527
This would look good hanging on me(I prolly wouldn't look any better, though)
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
EDIT: It would need a new custom pickguard. Maybe this:
Link Removed
NOT!
*Mufunzalo


There was a green one at the nearest local GC. I wanted to try it out to see how it felt compared to my 'old one'. But it was hanging at the top of the wall and I wasn't gonna bust their chops to get it down knowing full well I wasn't gonna buy it. I guess I was being too nice to them, particularly 'cos they usually ignore me(olde phart)when I'm in there.
I don't go after the angry piano tone, or anything else "iconic" about my 67 NR. I like the way it feels and the abundance of tones I can get with simple adjustments of the tone knob once I've set my amp's EQ to the room I'm in. And all that with flats and without using the 'superfluous' pup.
I'd like to get a 2021 NR so I could semi-retire the 67. Maybe 'one o' these days'….
EDIT: It would need a new custom pickguard. Maybe this:
Link Removed
So that’s what a bleeding ulcer looks like!I wouldn't think of actually doing that to a TBird. It was just the least attractive thing I saw to put on a Sparkling Burgundy bass.So that’s what a bleeding ulcer looks like!
There was a green one at the nearest local GC. I wanted to try it out to see how it felt compared to my 'old one'. But it was hanging at the top of the wall and I wasn't gonna bust their chops to get it down knowing full well I wasn't gonna buy it. I guess I was being too nice to them, particularly 'cos they usually ignore me(olde phart)when I'm in there.
Are those American weeks or Canadian weeks? Canadian weeks are a couple of years long...