• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

On fire!
IMG_6706.jpeg
 
‘66, way more then 10.
EDIT: actually think it was only 8.
At least you played it! I was in Chicago Music Exchange years ago and played a '62 J there - same deal... over $20k but I enjoyed playing it!
 
That ‘66 actually had 70’s pick up spacing.
It played great Geo.
And sounded absolutely fantastic.
I'll have to do some research on that - as far as I know, it wasn't until 1970 that the bridge pu shifted lower. Anyway... on that same visit of mine to CME, I played a black (re-fin IIRC) '66 J and was totally not impressed. Just because a bass is a certain year isn't a guarantee of it being awesome. I also played a '60s Epi Embassy bass and it too was just ok. But that '62 J... pretty damn awesome in every way. When I had a neck made for my '66 J body - I had my luthier clone a '62 J neck profile. It's my mainstay BG bass since building it up 10yrs ago.

Update: Judging from your pic - the upper flanges of the bridge pu are poking above the bridge-cover/ashtray. This indicates '60s spacing. While it's possible CBS/Fender sold some J's with the moved bridge pu in late '69 - officially it was moved in 1970. So a late '66 w/70s spacing is unlikely. FTR for anyone not versed in Fender/CBS minutia.., the real reason the bridge pu moved south (and only incrementally) was to completely hide it under the bridge-cover.., as in, a totally cosmetic reason. That it lead to slappers preference (or whatever) was purly happenstance.
 

Attachments

  • 1722050433870.jpeg
    1722050433870.jpeg
    61.3 KB · Views: 7
Last edited: