• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

It is great that it turned out to be what it is. I hope you make a video once it is sorted. The mudbucker has me intrigued, and I am trying to imagine what it will be like with both pickups wide open.
Installing a mud-bucker at the neck on a bass was a thing in the late '60-early '70s. The days of 18" speakers and big low-end.
 
I played the '21 NR yesterday and compared to the '64 Reverse last week, I prefer the Reverse. Just feels custom made for me. This is not to say I found the NR uncomfortable, just not as comfortable. For one, the reach is greater on (at least) the new NRs than the Reverses. I'm 6ft, so reach isn't a problem, but is noticeably different.
I have nothing against NRs. I just don’t love them and they seem to feel the same. I love Rs as a rule, and most of them love me.
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
talk about becoming a child again…..turning 60 next month…,
1726503930234.jpeg
 
I still like that "coming from everywhere" effect. A mudbucker and a Thunderbird pickup might be the best of both worlds.
Early '60s T-bird neck pu's are dark on their own so with a mud-bucker it would be even darker/bassy-er
 
that's what I thought - those pu's worth that?

It's not too bad, but those pickups are their own thing, to me, you either love them or hate them. They're not at all like any other Thunderbird pickup at all.
 
It's not too bad, but those pickups are their own thing, to me, you either love them or hate them. They're not at all like any other Thunderbird pickup at all.
Thanks - Im not interested in them but just wondered if they were worth that to someone.