• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

List night was was able to put some strings (LaBella Low Tension Flats) on the '66 NR that are pretty close to what is on the '64 (LaBella DTF) and do some back and forth. The Low Tensions are naturally a little less bright and a little more dark, as you would expect with round cores. Even with the darker/deeper strings the '64 still had more beef. The '66 with 916s more mids and highs. At home it sound nice and punchy. but Sunday it lacked some heft and some kind of presence. I'm hoping the darker strings will bring some beef to the table for Wed rehearsal. May be I need to do a little EQing. As mentioned Sunday, sounded good with the Ampeg, just not approaching the '64 kind of Thunderbird magic. I'm optimistic and have several string options yet to try, but worse case scenario I can drop in the pups from the doner Epi and see how they do. The Epis are little darker than a VP (pup placement and blend wiring and the 916s might be a better fit in that. I'd have to unsolder the cans to get the gold back on the '66. But I'm getting way ahead of myself--just realizing I have options if strings and EQ don't get me where I want to go.

As an aside, I was considering DTFs but with the repair I was wanting to lessen stress on the neck if possible and asked La Bella if they had tension numbers as I know what some rounds are I might use. They replied the next morning and said that unfortunately they don't publish those numbers, but they did suggest the Low Tensions and gave numbers for those. Since I had a set on a Pbass I swapped then last night.
 
My friend with the blue Gretsch kit has 4 kits in that room:
View attachment 7365851

And this rack of snares:
View attachment 7365852
That’s not all the snare drums…
There’s a nice vintage Gretsch kit and a huge electronic set in another room, a kit in cases ready to take out to gigs and I didn’t see the Ludwig Vistalite set :)
Drums are their own GAS problem. There is a kit out in the Basement of Blasphemy and Bad Ideas, but what you didn't see is that there is another one in the closet and a third stored in the other room. The one in the other room is a Ludwig Breakbeats bop kit that all fits into a tom case. It is about as mobile as possible for drums. The one in the closet is a kit with concert toms (no bottom heads). The two bigger kits are 1970s mahogany stencil kits, made in Taiwan for people who though cheap Japanese was not cheap enough. I love them for the warm sound they have. They hold tune well, too.

Then there is the cymbal and snare issue that drummers inevitably have. And all the auxiliary percussion toys. And little tweaks like heads, cast rims, you name it. It has no end. I suppose keyboards are more self-limiting but wouldn't know.
 
Weight on the '64 Reverse: 8.12
Weight on the '66 NR: 7.10
I thought it felt really light.
In A/B playing with the '64 I kept thinking it was lighter so I broke out the scales. It is likely the lightest bass I own. The Epi Embassy donor bass likely weights no more than that and possibly a little less.
that's just it, my '68 II comes in at 7 lbs hard to describe such bodacious bottom end from such a light plank of mahogany....the '64 doesn't do that...one of those things that must be experienced first hand imho....
 
that's just it, my '68 II comes in at 7 lbs hard to describe such bodacious bottom end from such a light plank of mahogany....the '64 doesn't do that...one of those things that must be experienced first hand imho....

Do let me know if the '64 needs a new home - There's always room at Casa Veronica.


Meantime, it's II Tuesday!

NvsLQAR.jpg
 
Last edited:
Greco does make a Reversed Reverse body for right handed players. But it could easily be strung for a lefty and would actually look more normal that way. If so, it would be a Reverse Reversed Reverse.
View attachment 7365565
Just remember, these are older basses, so no matter how much reversing you do, use the mirrors or look over your shoulder as there are no backup cameras.
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
that's just it, my '68 II comes in at 7 lbs hard to describe such bodacious bottom end from such a light plank of mahogany....the '64 doesn't do that...one of those things that must be experienced first hand imho....
Good to know. I was concerned that the goof before me (not J.T.), sanded 5 or 6 tree rings off given how it was so aggressively (and unevenly) sanded. Which was why I was trying to take as little off as possible when I sanded. I think if I got it perfectly flat it would weigh 6 lbs!
I always wanted to own and even just play a NR. Feel wise, could be the #1 player. (And I think my '64 Reverse feels custom made for me.) Neck is perfect (Gibson...?). Body ergos perfect for standing or sitting. Nice and thin, and no hard square edges (Gibson, you there?).
 
Last edited:
Good to know. I was concerned that the goof before me sanded 5 or 6 tree rings off given how it was so aggressively (and unevenly) sanded. Which was why I was trying to take as little off as possible when I sanded. I think if I got it perfectly flat it would weigh 6 lbs!
I always wanted to own and even just play a NR. Feel wise, could be the #1 player. (And I think my '64 Reverse feels custom made for me.) Neck is perfect. Body ergos perfect for standing or sitting. Nice and thin, and no hard square edges (Gibson, you there?).
That’s why I love my two second or later run BaCHs. Don’t get me wrong. I love the ‘21 and it’s a keeper. But they should have been more faithful to the 60’s body and neck.
 
That’s why I love my two second or later run BaCHs. Don’t get me wrong. I love the ‘21 and it’s a keeper. But they should have been more faithful to the 60’s body and neck.
The neck is the primary reason my RNR rarely gets play. As I think I've said, if I never saw it again, I would not be heartbroken.
 
The neck is the primary reason my RNR rarely gets play. As I think I've said, if I never saw it again, I would not be heartbroken.
Funny how some things are like that. I am completely neck agnostic, but there are other ergonomic things that make me put down a bass.
 
Good to know. I was concerned that the goof before me (not J.T.), sanded 5 or 6 tree rings off given how it was so aggressively (and unevenly) sanded. Which was why I was trying to take as little off as possible when I sanded. I think if I got it perfectly flat it would weigh 6 lbs!
I always wanted to own and even just play a NR. Feel wise, could be the #1 player. (And I think my '64 Reverse feels custom made for me.) Neck is perfect (Gibson...?). Body ergos perfect for standing or sitting. Nice and thin, and no hard square edges (Gibson, you there?).
something tells me your Embassy is probably close...never played one...