• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Yes, and yes - on Ballard Avenue more or less behind the U-Haul place on Leary Way. It was at the Maritime Pacific Brewery. We had a complete blast. The audience seemed happy enough, but as usual, we had more fun than they did.

Ahhh,,,,,, Ballard. :laugh:




 
It strikes me as odd that page #1991 came & went without somebody mentioning Nirvana's "Nevermind". Especially with the concentration of Seattlites we have here...

1990
Alice in Chains, that's why.

 
Last edited:
Took a little road trip down to Vancouver today and caught a show.
20748145_10155789316933933_1514259675164556038_o.jpg 20786043_10155789317143933_7915979592060150164_o.jpg 20748228_10155789317193933_3391058247641512700_o.jpg
20900541_10155789673723933_2817057924043381512_o.jpg

20170814_214842.jpg 20170814_225924.jpg
 
It strikes me as odd that page #1991 came & went without somebody mentioning Nirvana's "Nevermind". Especially with the concentration of Seattlites we have here...

I often get "Oh, you grew up in the Northwest/Seattle in the 90s, you must love Nirvana!" No, no I don't, I'm burnt out from hearing them so much. I mean, I get why people like them, but I'm much more fond of Soundgarden and Alice in Chains. Nirvana always strikes me as angsty and angry, but Soundgarden and Alice in Chains always sounded more sinister, desolate, ominous, portentous. Plus I always gotta give Soundgarden props for their unusual time signatures. Maybe it's because those two were more overtly heavy and metal influenced than the more punk Nirvana.







 
I often get "Oh, you grew up in the Northwest/Seattle in the 90s, you must love Nirvana!" No, no I don't, I'm burnt out from hearing them so much. I mean, I get why people like them, but I'm much more fond of Soundgarden and Alice in Chains. Nirvana always strikes me as angsty and angry, but Soundgarden and Alice in Chains always sounded more sinister, desolate, ominous, portentous. Plus I always gotta give Soundgarden props for their unusual time signatures. Maybe it's because those two were more overtly heavy and metal influenced than the more punk Nirvana.








Louder Than Love has always been my favorite Soundgarden album, and though Alice in Chains never made a bad album, "Dirt" is undoubtedly the one that tickled my sense of despair & self-loathing the most (somewhere, Layne Staley is half-smirking)
 
Since we're going to roll over to 1993....
After living in the greater Los Angeles area since 1985, The most bizarre set of events led up to my first move to Portland Oregon. But these events I dare not share here. Nothing illegal, just extremely bizarre is all I can say.


LA --> Portland --> Queens.

The picture becomes clearer, it appears that @JJR58 is a hipster... It could be other things, but the image of hipster amuses me.



I often get "Oh, you grew up in the Northwest/Seattle in the 90s, you must love Nirvana!" No, no I don't, I'm burnt out from hearing them so much. I mean, I get why people like them, but I'm much more fond of Soundgarden and Alice in Chains. Nirvana always strikes me as angsty and angry, but Soundgarden and Alice in Chains always sounded more sinister, desolate, ominous, portentous. Plus I always gotta give Soundgarden props for their unusual time signatures. Maybe it's because those two were more overtly heavy and metal influenced than the more punk Nirvana.

I was never clear on the appeal of Nirvana in the broad market. I much preferred Alice in Chains (and Soundgarden and Faith No More). It seemed to me that if you liked the content of Nirvana, you should similarly like Alice in Chains. If you didn't appreciate both, then why Nirvana (I would leap to the conclusion; because you are a poser).

4/4 is great, but have some variety!
 
I was never clear on the appeal of Nirvana in the broad market. I much preferred Alice in Chains (and Soundgarden and Faith No More). It seemed to me that if you liked the content of Nirvana, you should similarly like Alice in Chains. If you didn't appreciate both, then why Nirvana (I would leap to the conclusion; because you are a poser).

4/4 is great, but have some variety!

Can't people just like what they like? Can't it just be that simple?
 
If that was the case, we'd have nothing to talk about on TB... like tort.

But TORT is just an allegory for FSO's of which it's fun to joke about. But honestly, I'd own a 7ender with a tort PG if I needed one and wouldn't care what anyone thought of it.

But jumping on people for liking certain bands and their music seems odd to me for a group of musicians. Saying that this or that isn't to your liking is one thing, labeling their fans is quite another.

...and then the Juggalos destroy my argument. ;):roflmao:

dac77901814cc9aa273450a48eb019d8.jpg
 
Can't people just like what they like? Can't it just be that simple?

In my younger days, when typically young people label people as belonging or not to their self-identified peer group, those pretending to be something they aren't, were often labelled posers. It is the psychology of youth.

Having said that, there are styles of music that simply go together. I suspect that the vast majority of Rush fans also like Yes (or would if they were exposed to it). Most Miley Cyrus fans also like Katy Perry; most Jimi Hendrix fans also like Cream etc. So, my not understanding stems from two bands that play a similar style of music and fans that like one but do not like the other (Metallica and Megadeth excepted).

People can indeed like what they like. I don't have to understand it (but I do try to understand even if it doesn't match my own preferences).