nice! small though...been offered a part trade on the SVT (and 1540 cab) I recently got for the one on the left..
thing is, I've only used the amp three times and although I really like the EB, it's too small for my playing tastes so....dunno...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
nice! small though...been offered a part trade on the SVT (and 1540 cab) I recently got for the one on the left..
nice! small though...been offered a part trade on the SVT (and 1540 cab) I recently got for the one on the left..
thing is, I've only used the amp three times and although I really like the EB, it's too small for my playing tastes so....dunno...
View attachment 3404409
Now I’m even more sorry I didn’t see it.You missed a good one if you don't mind five minutes of amusement you will never get back. The girl in the picture was kinda cute, in an evil girl scout cookie dealer kind of way.
Yes, the pickups are terrible, that's why I can't buy it
At any rate, I'll always be checking into the TB club periodically, love the look, just can't justify another thing lying around.
The one on the left (in the photo, in your right hand in person) has banjo tuners. It must be a really and truly early one. I have thought about hunting down a birth-year EB-2, which would probably have a black bakelite mudbucker cover and banjo tuners. But, for the price, I probably won't. Especially with the worthless bridge that went on EBs up until about 1967 or 1968.nice! small though...been offered a part trade on the SVT (and 1540 cab) I recently got for the one on the left..
thing is, I've only used the amp three times and although I really like the EB, it's too small for my playing tastes so....dunno...
View attachment 3404409
Men's shoes, why do they have to be so ugly?
I know, right? Same with men's clothing.
Can't we all!The pickups/pre are terrible, but they can be replaced.
It's the Velcro...Doesn't qualify, shoes are standard issue.
We shouldn't bait you. You get there all on your own.I refuse to answer that question as i may incriminate myself.
Small rant here...…..
For the most part, yes. There are some men's clothes (and men) that really do look sharp. I see lots of people through the course of a normal workday, its completely commonplace to see nicely dressed women (nice clothes, and nice ensemble) on the train, walking to work and coming in to my store. Men doing the same thing are a rarity at best, I don't mind saying that I enjoy seeing a well dressed man, it just doesn't happen often. Further, it seems as though men are not allowed to wear anything even remotely form fitting, as if we should for some reason be ashamed to show any hint of a figure, and were you to do so, you'd be thought of in less than masculine terms. I detest most men's pants, they're baggy and often fit poorly and are unbecoming for the most part, since starting my job in downtown Seattle I've never worn men's pants to work, ever. I wear women's pants, usually from Eddie Bauer, they fit nice , look sharp and feel really good on my skin. I have some nice kind of stretchy black ones from Macy's that I really like too, so much more comfy than any men's pants!
It's new dress day, that's for later...…..end of small rant.![]()
TLDR, I don't like men's clothes!
I actually wear fairly tight jeans, not because that's intentional, but because they eventually shrink.
I think the only one give seen was maybe Ken Smith??? famous for his 6 inch woofers. haven't really seen others. Will have to go to the EHX website.
I care far more about comfort. I am very much a shorts and tee shirt kind of guy (if I must wear clothes). Frankly, if I could do life in just my underwear, I would. I'd be perfectly happy never wearing shoes, too.
I think no pg could look pretty cool on that one
Technically still slip-on...All my shoes are either Velcrotm or slip on.(except these:View attachment 3404565)