I was in a "Chicago" style band in 69-70. We'd gotten our 'act' together but didn't have a name yet. The guitarist suggested "Space D**k". After some deliberation we went with "Cherrystone". Sufficient double(triple?)meaning in that.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thunderbird Club
- Thread starter TBird1958
- Start date
-
- Tags
- club thunderbird
That's what I was thinking. Er, sorta.Actually a scientific theory applying the modus tollens syllogism to the reality proposed by the main empirical enunciations that ensue from its epidemiological designs. This method is frequently deductively refuted because of the non-fulfillment of auxiliary assumptions that would act as reciprocal potential falsifiers in multi studies. Thus taking the logical form of a bi-conditional argument of the type: (a) Heavier vs lighter and (b) fuller vs wimpy sounding. Therefore the lack of weight becomes a set of potential falsifiers of robust sound as part of the explicit falsity content of the bigger is better argument.
Disclaimer: I don't even know what the hell I just said, it's amazing what you can do with the simple cut and paste feature and a bit of creative wordsmithing.
The original source...
A landmark for popperian epidemiology: refutation of the randomised Aldactone evaluation study. - PubMed - NCBI
Actually a scientific theory applying the modus tollens syllogism to the reality proposed by the main empirical enunciations that ensue from its epidemiological designs. This method is frequently deductively refuted because of the non-fulfillment of auxiliary assumptions that would act as reciprocal potential falsifiers in multi studies. Thus taking the logical form of a bi-conditional argument of the type: (a) Heavier vs lighter and (b) fuller vs wimpy sounding. Therefore the lack of weight becomes a set of potential falsifiers of robust sound as part of the explicit falsity content of the bigger is better argument.
Disclaimer: I don't even know what the hell I just said, it's amazing what you can do with the simple cut and paste feature and a bit of creative wordsmithing.
The original source...
A landmark for popperian epidemiology: refutation of the randomised Aldactone evaluation study. - PubMed - NCBI
Well, you had me going there.
As we make a hard right turn from our normal Thunderbird banter, we no longer have parallel TBird discussions in play, we've gone...
Input jack on a Fender Rumble. It’s baffling that even Fender doesn’t have it. At least when the warranty runs out.
It’s a bit loose but soldiers on.
good luck, i got a Rumble 100 in for repair. they use these weird "spider" potentiometers and two of them cracked when the amp was dropped (?, has a dent in the front panel) but because i heard they are hard to find (only've seen them on Peaveys) i asked Fender about buying the complete front panel PCB ass'y....their response below;......
.....looks like i'm gonna have to "wire" a couple of off the shelf pots in...
conversely, i can find parts for this almost 60 year old Sears Silvertone 1541 "amp in a case" with no problem...good luck, i got a Rumble 100 in for repair. they use these weird "spider" potentiometers and two of them cracked when the amp was dropped (?, has a dent in the front panel) but because i heard they are hard to find (only've seen them on Peaveys) i asked Fender about buying the complete front panel PCB ass'y....their response below;......
View attachment 3493492
you got it right though!....Actually a scientific theory applying the modus tollens syllogism to the reality proposed by the main empirical enunciations that ensue from its epidemiological designs. This method is frequently deductively refuted because of the non-fulfillment of auxiliary assumptions that would act as reciprocal potential falsifiers in multi studies. Thus taking the logical form of a bi-conditional argument of the type: (a) Heavier vs lighter and (b) fuller vs wimpy sounding. Therefore the lack of weight becomes a set of potential falsifiers of robust sound as part of the explicit falsity content of the bigger is better argument.
Disclaimer: I don't even know what the hell I just said, it's amazing what you can do with the simple cut and paste feature and a bit of creative wordsmithing.
The original source...
A landmark for popperian epidemiology: refutation of the randomised Aldactone evaluation study. - PubMed - NCBI
..
I was at a friends cottage for the weekend - a gathering of the school clan. A couple of years ago, I was labelled "the mean Dad" by the son of one of the couples; the parents remarked that my daughter is remarkably polite and well behaved. When their son demands access to a phone to play games, it was begrudgingly granted with limits (which were mostly ignored). When I walked in later and the kids were gathered around a tablet. I simply said that it was nice out and they should go play outside, the tablet was dutifully put away and the kids went to the dock with no complaints. I was asked how I managed such a miraculous feat. My only explanation is that I speak very authoritatively and the kids fear what I might do if they don't comply (will the mean Dad forcefully remove the tablet and throw it in the lake, will he start throwing kids in the lake? Imaginations can run wild).
My daughter is a good kid; very polite and respectful. I think it is because there is no longer a need to test limits. On the one hand, she realized early on that it was a losing battle because I have always stuck to my guns. But it is also that when she is ready to do something, she will ask, we will discuss and we will find a way to make it work within boundaries. I'm not unreasonable, but am stern.
That explains their insistence that it be under warranty.good luck, i got a Rumble 100 in for repair. they use these weird "spider" potentiometers and two of them cracked when the amp was dropped (?, has a dent in the front panel) but because i heard they are hard to find (only've seen them on Peaveys) i asked Fender about buying the complete front panel PCB ass'y....their response below;......
View attachment 3493492
It’s a G.D. Input jack!!
buy a generic one and wire it in..
good luck, i got a Rumble 100 in for repair. they use these weird "spider" potentiometers and two of them cracked when the amp was dropped (?, has a dent in the front panel) but because i heard they are hard to find (only've seen them on Peaveys) i asked Fender about buying the complete front panel PCB ass'y....their response below;......
View attachment 3493492
Won't someone think of poor FMIC here!? Amplifiers do pretty much exactly the same thing as they did 50+ years ago. A serviceable product is one that you will not replace periodically depriving poor FMIC of ongoing revenues. Are you trying to put people out of work?
lol...modern day business model....there's no money in servicing modern stuff...none meant to be...disposability is king....I just do it these kind of jobs for friends...
Well played. I just ambled through it until I got to the "lighter vs heavier" bit...Actually a scientific theory applying the modus tollens syllogism to the reality proposed by the main empirical enunciations that ensue from its epidemiological designs. This method is frequently deductively refuted because of the non-fulfillment of auxiliary assumptions that would act as reciprocal potential falsifiers in multi studies. Thus taking the logical form of a bi-conditional argument of the type: (a) Heavier vs lighter and (b) fuller vs wimpy sounding. Therefore the lack of weight becomes a set of potential falsifiers of robust sound as part of the explicit falsity content of the bigger is better argument.
Disclaimer: I don't even know what the hell I just said, it's amazing what you can do with the simple cut and paste feature and a bit of creative wordsmithing.
The original source...
A landmark for popperian epidemiology: refutation of the randomised Aldactone evaluation study. - PubMed - NCBI
Gaolee
Official leathers tester and crash dummy
The PinkBird left Hodgkins, Illinois at 7:30 this morning. Nah, I'm not counting the days... Next stop?
Still due 8/5 at my place of work sometime during the day.
Still due 8/5 at my place of work sometime during the day.
There's the Bic Lighter aspect of Class D, et al. I don't like the new business model, I want to be able to fix it and have it a long time.
The fact that I have flipped a metric ton of gear in my lifetime has nothing to do with it. I like my Trace and Acoustic heads... and I'll probably never have to send them to the landfill.
None of that stuff will end up in a landfill (unless you take it there and dump it while no one is looking). It will go to the 3rd world where it will be stripped for all the recyclable elements in it (copper, lead, tin, zinc, silicon, germanium, strontium etc.).
Yeah, worse than the landfill.None of that stuff will end up in a landfill (unless you take it there and dump it while no one is looking). It will go to the 3rd world where it will be stripped for all the recyclable elements in it (copper, lead, tin, zinc, silicon, germanium, strontium etc.).
