• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Yup. They meet in mid-air like hands clapping.:nailbiting:

Or on your head, one slapping each side of your face for violating the first rule of Gibson/Epiphone Three Point Bridge Setup Club.

I won't let you ruffians tarnish my elegant and somewhat quaint 3-pt, tailor-made for my bass, pot-metal bridge.
I won't.
I won't.
I won't...
 
easy. PM me.
Lol, sorry, j/k... I've been thinking about this hpf business, am squirreling away bread for such a pedal. But I'm always looking for a way to cheap out!
I'm going to stick with ther plan I think, but it's an intriguing idea, a cable with a built in hpf.
 
Last edited:
I think it's an EB-3 with an EB-0 TRC. 2 holes for pups but also too many holes in the body, including one for the 4* position switch by the PG. edit-through the PG.

* the older ones had 4 positions-which I never did figure out-like my 66. My 00's Epi had a 3 position switch: neck, both, bridge.

Addendum: 1-neck, 2-bridge, 3-?, 4-??

In my stock 66 EB-3 pos. 1 is the neck with choke, 2=bridge, 3=neck+bridge with choke, 4=neck without choke.
Pos. 1-3 all sound rather thin, 4 is the mudbucker in all it's glory. I found that putting the 4-position switch "in between" positions 2 and 3 somehow bypasses the choke and gives a much more bassy sound. This is my normal position when I play this bass.
 
For an equilibrium condition, the forces have to zero out. The short ends are consequential in that regard. The vertical forces have to add to zero, which means that the break angle isn't an issue as far as the inserts pulling out. It's a moment arm. The downward force on the front insert has to be equal to the upward force on the rear inserts. The break angle has more to do with string behavior than whether the inserts pull out. All things being equal, of course. And of course, they have to be. It's euclidean physics. Ask PillO. I'm sure he will tell you.
Don't ask PillO. I didn't like doing vector math when I learned it and that never changed. And, probably not coincidentally, I haven't done it in years. Surely we have a mechanical engineer around here who would be happy to do that math. An electrical engineer could probably do it too. Maybe even a civil engineer.
 
Giving this a little more thought (far more than it deserves), I think my mental back of the envelope calculations were too simplistic. I failed to account for the fulcrum at the front bolt. I was thinking only of the string break over the saddles. To better analyze the dynamics, I think I need to draw a diagram (and I am not going to do that). But I will say that the quick and dirty mental math I did is probably close to reality; close enough for the discussions here.

Any mechanical engineers here can put their degree(s) to some use and do the actual calculations. Because what else are you going to do? Practice?
What would Einstein do in this STRESSFUL situation? :hyper:
 
My 3 favorites to play are A Day in the Life, The End and Something. Why don't you enjoy playing Beatles tunes might I ask? :woot:

We play "I'm So Tired", played "When I'm 64", (for my 64th BD gig) and are learning "Hey Bulldog". Hard to go wrong with a Beatles song in the set.
 
Don't ask PillO. I didn't like doing vector math when I learned it and that never changed. And, probably not coincidentally, I haven't done it in years. Surely we have a mechanical engineer around here who would be happy to do that math. An electrical engineer could probably do it too. Maybe even a civil engineer.

and don't call me Shirley...

Toy-Factory-Cartoon-Cartoon-Kids-Videos-for-Kids-Trains-for-Kids-Train-Cartoon-Cars-Toys.jpg