And I can't decide between the black and the almond. Prolly gonna go with 'neither'.+1
Can't decide between the blue or the burgundy though...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And I can't decide between the black and the almond. Prolly gonna go with 'neither'.+1
Can't decide between the blue or the burgundy though...
Maybe more important, there is carrying cost to inventory. If they hold it for several years and sell it for what they paid, they are still losing on it. Perhaps they are taking a depreciation charge on it each year and won't sell until its depreciated value matches what similar items are selling for?So they have wall art.
It occurs to me they can sell it for less and write off the loss. Better than sitting on it forever. Maybe.
ADDENDUM: And that part about it "being up on Reverb". Reverb wouldn't know if they sold it to someone who "walked in their door".,
, nudge, nudge.
![]()
I think I have settled on getting the green.+1
Can't decide between the blue or the burgundy though...
Indeed,I completely understand the premium given to a celebrity owned instrument. Les Paul's Les Paul is worth considerably more than the one my son owns and for good reason.
And I can't decide between the black and the almond. Prolly gonna go with 'neither'.
did you buy it?I do not understand and can't value the "mojo" of "celebrity" ownership. To my mind, any premium over expected selling price is a result of the greater fool theory - that is, it is worth more because it can be sold for more than the purchase price. But at some point, the item reaches the greatest fool.
Ladies and gentlemen, this bass has found its greatest fool.
I do not understand and can't value the "mojo" of "celebrity" ownership. To my mind, any premium over expected selling price is a result of the greater fool theory - that is, it is worth more because it can be sold for more than the purchase price. But at some point, the item reaches the greatest fool.
Ladies and gentlemen, this bass has found its greatest fool.
did you buy it?



Marshal needs that one, for sure. He only needs one kidney.@MCF Look what I found on Reverb(no affiliation). And it already has a bridge cover.
Gibson Thunderbird II Non Reverse 1967 Blue | Spacetone Music | Reverb
That's one I would want. Way out of my price range, even selling both kidneys.saw this there too...pretty sweet...
Gibson Thunderbird II Sunburst 1965 | Reverb
"Not sure if the headstock was broken or not previously but just go ahead and assume it was." Nice.@MCF Look what I found on Reverb(no affiliation). And it already has a bridge cover.
Gibson Thunderbird II Non Reverse 1967 Blue | Spacetone Music | Reverb
On the hill?
So they have wall art.
It occurs to me they can sell it for less and write off the loss. Better than sitting on it forever. Maybe.
ADDENDUM: And that part about it "being up on Reverb". Reverb wouldn't know if they sold it to someone who "walked in their door".,
, nudge, nudge.
![]()
Maybe more important, there is carrying cost to inventory. If they hold it for several years and sell it for what they paid, they are still losing on it. Perhaps they are taking a depreciation charge on it each year and won't sell until its depreciated value matches what similar items are selling for?
The Reverb thing is a red herring. There are plenty of instruments that are listed on multiple sites.
With the right provenance I agree.I completely understand the premium given to a celebrity owned instrument. Les Paul's Les Paul is worth considerably more than the one my son owns and for good reason.
Provenance is everything on celebrity owned gear if you intend to ever break even or profit from your purchase. A signed guitar without provenance is worth nothing more than one without the signature. But with that provenance it becomes very valuable to a collector. The same, and even more so goes for instruments played on stage by celebrities (as long as there's a video recording of it and verifiable accompanying documentation signed by the celebrity) and even more value is attached if the instrument was used to record a hit song (again with verifiable and signed documentation).I understand that it is something that people do - ascribe value to the provenance of an instrument - but it isn't something I can do. I have no math to describe the value added by ownership by "celebrities". Unless it were autographed.
As there is a viable market for autographed items (various sports memorabilia etc.) I can put a number to value-added by an autograph. But, prior ownership has many problems; most significant is the problem of proof. Were I to buy the items from the celebrity themselves, I would know; but how to prove to others? It gets difficult and there is plenty of potential for fraud.
The exception might be factory limited edition signed by the artist instruments. As there are several, there is a viable market, and (assuming the manufacturer keeps good records) a good audit trail of ownership.
But don't go by me; I'm not "normal".
I'm in the same boat. Would like a new NR Gibby but I'm waiting to see pics of the colors in real life owner photos first. The Blue or Green or Red or Almond all look great to me. I already have enough Black and Burst birds.+1
Can't decide between the blue or the burgundy though...
Unless Reverb has changed its policy, there's no penalty. I had a bass listed on Reverb and TB. It sold through TB. I took down the Reverb listing. No charge. I've noticed they've raised their % cut/fee, so I prolly won't go through them anymore.Absolutely, it was a pretty ridiculous conversation to be honest. So if I walk into your store, you're going to have me go through Reverb to pay for the bloody thing? Fat chance there. It just went in circles and at the end it pretty much came down to "Look, here's the deal, I know what you have there, even if whoever in your store that bought it doesn't, but that's your mistake. Here is the cash price I am willing to walk in the door and pay you. I can give you $3500, and walk out the door." And it was a straight no. "We have to sell it through reverb as it's already been listed there, so there's a penalty if we take it down." Do you think I was born yesterday? I mean, I had to keep asking if they had the pickup cover, and they kept saying "Yeah, there's a cover on the pickup" until I asked them to damn well google what the pickup cover was. A braintrust, they are not.
And I can't decide between the black and the almond. Prolly gonna go with 'neither'.
I'm in the same boat. Would like a new NR Gibby but I'm waiting to see pics of the colors in real life owner photos first. The Blue or Green or Red or Almond all look great to me. I already have enough Black and Burst birds.
Unless Reverb has changed its policy, there's no penalty. I had a bass listed on Reverb and TB. It sold through TB. I took down the Reverb listing. No charge. I've noticed they've raised their % cut/fee, so I prolly won't go through them anymore.
Yeah. Tough decision for some. I’m going with blue. You could always buy two.+1
Can't decide between the blue or the burgundy though...
Now that you mention it, I think you're correct. Almond may have been one of the new Eppi Embassy colors not a Gibby TBird offering. But it sure would look sweet on a bird!Is there word of the Epi Smoked Almond option for the Gibson? I hadn't heard that, any pictures available, or more info?.
I am a greater fool not the greatest fool...did you buy it?
Celebrity ownership doesn’t mean much to me except for a bit of cool factor. I bought my Foundation from the longtime bassist for Buck Owens from ‘69 to the present; they still do a few shows at The Crystal Palace even though Buck left us many years back. The bassist is a very nice, humble guy who sold it for the going price for a Foundation. I did not ask him to provide a letter of authenticity even though I’m sure he would have and probably still would if I asked. But I won’t.I understand that it is something that people do - ascribe value to the provenance of an instrument - but it isn't something I can do. I have no math to describe the value added by ownership by "celebrities". Unless it were autographed.
As there is a viable market for autographed items (various sports memorabilia etc.) I can put a number to value-added by an autograph. But, prior ownership has many problems; most significant is the problem of proof. Were I to buy the items from the celebrity themselves, I would know; but how to prove to others? It gets difficult and there is plenty of potential for fraud.
The exception might be factory limited edition signed by the artist instruments. As there are several, there is a viable market, and (assuming the manufacturer keeps good records) a good audit trail of ownership.
But don't go by me; I'm not "normal".