• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

It's been mentioned b4-a few(10K+/-)posts ago, but check with SHIPBIKES.com[8773234083] for shipping costs. A lotta people have shipped guitars/basses with them. Apparently they get a discount. A bike shop might have a box too. Or a local GC, SA, ??.

Unfortunately that got shut down because the service was for bikes, not basses. From the original thread:

MODERATOR NOTE: The company reached out to the site's Help Desk and asked that we announce that they do not, in fact ship bass guitars, and that the information that they did was a mistake. So closing this:

"We are in the business of shipping bicycles and bicycling equipment and not bass guitars. Our email to a customer was taken out of context and we are not in the business of shipping guitars. Please give me a call to discuss as we would like to stop any additional shipments of non cycling equipment via our service."


Hey guys, I just got a motorcycle accident few hours ago. The doctor said I need a few weeks to be able to put weight on my shoulders. Got a swollen knee and shoulder, few bruises and stitches. Anyone have any experience with swollen shoulder before? As soon as I've got home, I played my guitar and my shoulder not feel right. Should play on a charity event this Saturday. My option is either playing while sit or cancel the event.

Sorry to hear about the accident. Hope you have a speedy recovery.
 
Unfortunately that got shut down because the service was for bikes, not basses. From the original thread:

MODERATOR NOTE: The company reached out to the site's Help Desk and asked that we announce that they do not, in fact ship bass guitars, and that the information that they did was a mistake. So closing this:

"We are in the business of shipping bicycles and bicycling equipment and not bass guitars. Our email to a customer was taken out of context and we are not in the business of shipping guitars. Please give me a call to discuss as we would like to stop any additional shipments of non cycling equipment via our service."




Sorry to hear about the accident. Hope you have a speedy recovery.
Ah. I never used them(never had anything to ship)but vaguely remembered it. Oh, well, LSTYD.
 
Something just struck me as odd. I’m sitting here playing my 2015 T-bird. You know, the one with the factory Babicz bridge. It occurred to me that the Babicz bridge was designed to be an aftermarket solution to “fix” the factory 3-point bridge that many folks complain about. It seems odd to me that Gibson entered into a (potentially expensive) agreement with Babicz to outfit the 2015 T-birds with that bridge, when it would’ve likely been much less expensive to have outfitted it with the same basic TuneOMatic bridge that’s on the Epiphone Vintage Pros. Can anyone provide any insight into why Gibson went with the Babicz instead of using the old tried and true system from the original 1960’s T-birds?
Nope. There is no insight into Gibson decisions. For what it is worth Babicz also makes bridges to fix the inherent flaws of Fender bridges as well.
 
That was a green one? For some reason I was remembering a blue one. I'm sure you're correct. My memory is getting bad.
To be honest, I can’t tell the green one from the blue one unless they’re side by side. And in the right light when you put the faded PB next to regular PB the faded PB one looks like it might be Inverness Green. So you’re probably right.

Something just struck me as odd. I’m sitting here playing my 2015 T-bird. You know, the one with the factory Babicz bridge. It occurred to me that the Babicz bridge was designed to be an aftermarket solution to “fix” the factory 3-point bridge that many folks complain about. It seems odd to me that Gibson entered into a (potentially expensive) agreement with Babicz to outfit the 2015 T-birds with that bridge, when it would’ve likely been much less expensive to have outfitted it with the same basic TuneOMatic bridge that’s on the Epiphone Vintage Pros. Can anyone provide any insight into why Gibson went with the Babicz instead of using the old tried and true system from the original 1960’s T-birds?
Speculation only…
First - The “tried and true” 1960’s Tbird bridge had its share of intonation problems (ask Godofthunder, he designed a replacement for it).
Second - Im not convinced that the Gibson design crew even knows that Epiphone exists. They seem to regularly not incorporate Eppi innovation into the Gibby brand.

I have three points, babicz, Hipshot and Eppi two piece bridges. I personally don’t consider the babicz to be a functional improvement over the three point. Both bridges can be dialed in for equally low action and the three point can get there much faster with less work. At least the Hipshot bridge (which I also have) adds string spacing capability that neither the three point or the Bab can do. That said, My favorite Tbird bridge to date is still the Eppi two piece followed by the Gibby three point.
 
It's still Thunderbird Thursday right? Right?! :nailbiting:


20210916_221421.jpg
 
To be honest, I can’t tell the green one from the blue one unless they’re side by side. And in the right light when you put the faded PB next to regular PB the faded PB one looks like it might be Inverness Green. So you’re probably right.


Speculation only…
First - The “tried and true” 1960’s Tbird bridge had its share of intonation problems (ask Godofthunder, he designed a replacement for it).
Second - Im not convinced that the Gibson design crew even knows that Epiphone exists. They seem to regularly not incorporate Eppi innovation into the Gibby brand.

I have three points, babicz, Hipshot and Eppi two piece bridges. I personally don’t consider the babicz to be a functional improvement over the three point. Both bridges can be dialed in for equally low action and the three point can get there much faster with less work. At least the Hipshot bridge (which I also have) adds string spacing capability that neither the three point or the Bab can do. That said, My favorite Tbird bridge to date is still the Eppi two piece followed by the Gibby three point.
wonder if Gibson’s fixation with the three point on anything post 70”s stems from manufacturing tooling that makes use of any/all of the bridge mounting holes as part of the build process…..on another note, been meaning to ask, you are one of the few with both the BaCH and the Eppi two piece bridges, other than the different claws, any other differences worth mentioning?
 
Last edited:
wonder if Gibson’s fixation with the three point on anything post 70”s stems from manufacturing tooling that makes use of any/all of the bridge mounting holes as part of the build process…..on another note, been meaning to ask, you are one of the few with both the BaCH and the Eppi two piece bridges, other than the different claws, any other differences worth mentioning?
Yeah, I have both the Eppi and BaCH two piece. They are different. As you noted the claw is very different, but so is the saddle section. Here’s a pic of the two with the BaCH on the left…
7937ED67-ECD7-4448-87E9-77018039C72E.jpeg

…not shown is the Greco which uses a different claw altogether, very similar to the BaCH (very square) except the top edges are beveled.
 
To be honest, I can’t tell the green one from the blue one unless they’re side by side. And in the right light when you put the faded PB next to regular PB the faded PB one looks like it might be Inverness Green. So you’re probably right.


Speculation only…
First - The “tried and true” 1960’s Tbird bridge had its share of intonation problems (ask Godofthunder, he designed a replacement for it).
Second - Im not convinced that the Gibson design crew even knows that Epiphone exists. They seem to regularly not incorporate Eppi innovation into the Gibby brand.

I have three points, babicz, Hipshot and Eppi two piece bridges. I personally don’t consider the babicz to be a functional improvement over the three point. Both bridges can be dialed in for equally low action and the three point can get there much faster with less work. At least the Hipshot bridge (which I also have) adds string spacing capability that neither the three point or the Bab can do. That said, My favorite Tbird bridge to date is still the Eppi two piece followed by the Gibby three point.
I'm a little confused. I've heard the stock 3 points are absolutely terrible and to immediately switch to a Hipshot but you're saying their good right? I don't really understand these bridges that well.