• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I think maybe for this Thunderbird Thursday, I'm going to do a bit of a sorta combo ('you got your chocolate in my peanut butter!") of two of my favorite things.....

20211006_223053.jpg





:smug:
 
Finally, I can sleep at night!:D That unused claw had my OCD in overdrive. But the real question is, do you notice any difference in sustain or intonation.
no major difference in sustain or intonation (the latter surprised me), gigged it last night with mixed feelings….something didn’t seem right, the feel of the boomers was excellent but i could not seem to get the bottom previously available from the Greco (RS66?)/Ashdown combo, the growl and bark were there but seemed a bit thin for my taste….I’ll allow for the set to mellow a little (as suggested by dagrev) and see……for all you know it could have been crappy line voltage? new moon? claw? me? who knows…. :meh:
 
Last edited:
Number 1, excited at the possibility of a proper 'Bird from Gibson. If it's a Reverse, I'll probably refrain from getting one given how great the Epi is. If they revamp the NR to me more vintage accurate, I am IN.

However, in more pressing news, I've been playing my Greco 4001s just about non-stop the last month, tracked our whole next album with it (barring one song on 8 and dub'd parts on the Epi). I've been moving in this direction for a while, but the 4001s really let me dive into stereo set-ups. Last gig I ran the bridge pickup straight into the Sunn, and the neck through a Wah and overdrive, and it was about the biggest, gnarliest sound I've managed. The way this 4001s is rigged has a push/pull pot to switch the mono output to stereo, and I want to rig that same sort of set-up into my Epiphone. Vol/Vol/Tone, with a push/pul on one of the pots to run with a TRS. I would think one pickup would have the tone knob and then the other would have to run direct from volume to output. Anyone done this before?
I haven’t done it, but I like the concept.
 
no major difference in sustain or intonation (the latter surprised me), gigged it last night with mixed feelings….something didn’t seem right, the feel of the boomers was excellent but i could not seem to get the bottom previously available from the Greco (RS66?)/Ashdown combo, the growl and bark were there but seemed a bit thin for my taste….I’ll allow for the set to mellow a little (as suggested by dagrev) and see……for all you know it could have been crappy line voltage? new moon? claw? me? who knows…. :meh:
Odd about lack of bottom. Boomers are known for plenty of that. But it just may not be a good match. For me, some basses sound better with some strings and definitely not with others. I find that true when changing rigs, different strings are often needed. But don't sweat it at all if they don't work. Life is too short for bad tone!
 
@Miles_ONeal Some Phase 90 history and how to build one.
https://puzzlesounds.com/history-mxr-phase-90-effect-pedal/

ElectroSmash - MXR Phase 90 Analysis.

History
https://thejhsshow.com/articles/how-mxr-pedals-became-legendary

According to the pot code, mine is likely an '82.

The History
MXR was founded back in 1972. Produced in 1973, the Phase 90 was one of MXR’s first products in the original Preference series (along with the also legendary DynaComp, Phase 45, Distortion +, and Micro Amp). Over the next 11 years, these pedals went through some minor cosmetic and minor circuit changes and were thus split into three periods. The first was the Script Period (1973-1975). These were the originals with a fancy pants style script logo and the original circuits. The next was the First Block Period (1975-1981). The logo was changed in 1975 to an easier to read block letter font. The circuits were changed during this period as well (these changes were very minor and even some Script pedals had the circuit revisions, and some Block ones had original circuits). Lastly, was the Second Block Period (1981-1984), in which an AC input and a status LED were added for better functionality.

MXR went bankrupt in 1984 after some poor missteps in regards to some of their other products (2000 and Commander series pedals mainly, possibly another reverse hype article like this one?). The company was revived by Jim Dunlop in 1987 and with it, he brought back all the original pedals, including the Phase 90, and they’re still in production to this day.

So, what makes the original Phase 90 so pricey? Well…….

Why Is It So Hyped?
Eddie Van Halen.
Goodnight.
(Seinfeld theme)
In all seriousness, you could probably chalk a lot of the Phase 90’s success to EVH’s use of it throughout VH I, and most notably on Eruption.

Another key reason is the scarcity of some of the early units and the desirability of the original script circuit (which, as I said, is not much different from the block circuit.Again, some early block logos have script circuits, and some late scripts have block circuits). Lastly, they just sounded warm and rich without going over the top like some of the other phasers at the time.
Analyzing The Hype: MXR Phase 90

And they sound great with these....
F1iP-ERjSxjQKl56v8YF3vY9hYpsTxlX1nzSXuc6jrqjQ3ci8Ofcs0j6LCSctws-J05S1Cg=w994-h1324-no?authuser=0.jpg
 
Last edited: