• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Truth or Marketing?

It depends on whether you agree with what Leo Fender considered to be refinements.

In guitar terms, he got a lot right with the first Telecaster, except some weird wiring decisions. The Strat is clearly a refinement of this idea. The Jaguar and Jazzmaster are, again, an evolution. But, those offsets were designed to have a broad tone with lots of passive circuitry cunning to give players more options. Are they better than a slab-bodied '52 Tele? Or, are they convoluted and fiddly designs, lacking a certain mojo because the performance Leo chased in his designs deviated increasingly from what guitarists and bassists actually wanted.
 
Well... since Leo Fender created and ran both companies, seems to me that he would be in a position to know - when he said it, anyway. And, while Leo's "G&L is the best..." may not be totally objective truth, it would certainly seem to be his truth...
Personally? I own both a '78 Fender P-Bass and a '15 G&L ASAT Bass. Based on objective criteria, which is "Better"? I'd have to say that the G&L is the winner - but not by a whole lot. It's considerably lighter than the Fender, but it's also noticeably more neck heavy. Not by a lot, but... you feel it when you play it. And, being an active bass, it's a lot more "versatile" than my old Fender. Which, for me, is not really a point in it's favor; I own and play 23 different basses, so "versatile" doesn't win many points with me. However; a '23 Fender vs. a '23 G&L? That's a question I can't answer; my herd is all full, so I'll let y'all fight... er, argue... over their relative merits...:whistle:
 
In guitar terms, he got a lot right with the first Telecaster, except some weird wiring decisions.

What was the single-pickup version, was that the Broadcaster or the Esquire? That guitar had some seriously weird wiring decisions!
Also I think most folks -- including Leo -- would agree that having a single bridge saddle for every pair of strings was a compromise at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTalon and 6-3-2
What was the single-pickup version, was that the Broadcaster or the Esquire? That guitar had some seriously weird wiring decisions!
Also I think most folks -- including Leo -- would agree that having a single bridge saddle for every pair of strings was a compromise at best.


The good folk at TDPRI would keep us straight! The first 'snakehead' Tele was an Esquire as it only had a bridge pickup. Whether the Esquire truly predates the Broad/Telecaster I don't know. Wired on the assumption you would never want to use both pickups at the same time but might want a preset bassy tone.
 
I've owned a lot of Fenders, mostly Ps and one J. I have owned 4 G&Ls, three of which I still have.
SB2, SB2-T, LB 100, M2500.
My observations are G&L pays more attention to fit and finish than Fender. G&L instruments are also more modern in design and configuration. It seems Fender is only now moving in that direction. I've traditionally been a Fender Fan Boy, but I like my G&Ls better. Of those my favorite is my SB2-T.
SB-2 4.jpeg