• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

20 some years ago, when I was first starting out as a bassist, I had an early 90s Peavey Foundation. It was my first bass that I owned myself, not counting the crummy Squier Bronco that I shared with my younger brother. But I was young and foolish enough at the time that I bought into the Fender hype and eventually traded it in for credit towards a Mexican P bass (which I still have and love, I just wish I hadn't been so eager to lose the Peavey).

I've been kicking myself for that decision now for years. I've also been keen to acquire a bass from the year I was born, 1984.

Last weekend I traded some shop time and soldering know-how to a fellow TB member, and wound up not only with a birth year bass but one that's awfully similar to that old Foundation.

1000005365.jpg


I knew that this was going to be a bit of a fixer upper project when I accepted it. There are some cosmetic issues, such as pitting on the metal Peavey logo "P" knobs and bridge plate, scuffs and dents in the body that are largely cosmetic, and those I can live with - they're just signs of a well loved and often played instrument.

The neck, however, needs some TLC to make it really playable. The frets on this are worn down enough that they may actually be the originals from 1984. I'll need to pull them and put in some new frets, but before I put in new ones, the gloss poly finish on the neck has spots where it's worn through or scuffed up, and has that slightly sticky feeling some gloss poly finishes tend to get after a while.

I haven't determined whether I'll strip the neck finish all the way down to the wood, or sand it down to a thin satin finish. That will depend on how deep the scuffs go. If I do take it all the way bare I'll refinish with Tru Oil.

Someone also adjusted the neck tiltback screw, making anything above the 15th fret unplayable unless the saddles are raised as high as they can go. So a full setup is in this bass's future as well. At the moment this has some D'Addario NYXL strings on it, I used the lower 4 strings of a 5 string set as it was already set up for BEAD tuning. The Super Ferrite pickup is a gem, I love how full and rich it sounds even for a single coil. It handles the low B remarkably well.

One interesting thing I noticed while inspecting it last night is that the maple neck is two pieces, joined at the center line - I don't think I've seen another neck built like this before!

1000005391.jpg


I'm excited to bring this bass up to its full potential. It may look like an old beater but aside from the wear and setup, it's a fine instrument.
 
20 some years ago, when I was first starting out as a bassist, I had an early 90s Peavey Foundation. It was my first bass that I owned myself, not counting the crummy Squier Bronco that I shared with my younger brother. But I was young and foolish enough at the time that I bought into the Fender hype and eventually traded it in for credit towards a Mexican P bass (which I still have and love, I just wish I hadn't been so eager to lose the Peavey).

I've been kicking myself for that decision now for years. I've also been keen to acquire a bass from the year I was born, 1984.

Last weekend I traded some shop time and soldering know-how to a fellow TB member, and wound up not only with a birth year bass but one that's awfully similar to that old Foundation.

View attachment 7000114

I knew that this was going to be a bit of a fixer upper project when I accepted it. There are some cosmetic issues, such as pitting on the metal Peavey logo "P" knobs and bridge plate, scuffs and dents in the body that are largely cosmetic, and those I can live with - they're just signs of a well loved and often played instrument.

The neck, however, needs some TLC to make it really playable. The frets on this are worn down enough that they may actually be the originals from 1984. I'll need to pull them and put in some new frets, but before I put in new ones, the gloss poly finish on the neck has spots where it's worn through or scuffed up, and has that slightly sticky feeling some gloss poly finishes tend to get after a while.

I haven't determined whether I'll strip the neck finish all the way down to the wood, or sand it down to a thin satin finish. That will depend on how deep the scuffs go. If I do take it all the way bare I'll refinish with Tru Oil.

Someone also adjusted the neck tiltback screw, making anything above the 15th fret unplayable unless the saddles are raised as high as they can go. So a full setup is in this bass's future as well. At the moment this has some D'Addario NYXL strings on it, I used the lower 4 strings of a 5 string set as it was already set up for BEAD tuning. The Super Ferrite pickup is a gem, I love how full and rich it sounds even for a single coil. It handles the low B remarkably well.

One interesting thing I noticed while inspecting it last night is that the maple neck is two pieces, joined at the center line - I don't think I've seen another neck built like this before!

View attachment 7000133

I'm excited to bring this bass up to its full potential. It may look like an old beater but aside from the wear and setup, it's a fine instrument.
Congrats on perhaps the best Peavey Super Ferrite model bass after the T series. Wish you all the best on your journey to full playability. I use mine for 1/2 step down songs and it's a beast. The bi-laminated neck is on US Peaveys up until probably 1992-93 ish time frame. Then they shifted to a single piece neck with a maple board most likely to reduce cost. The bi-lam necks, when properly cared for and set up can be some of the most stable necks out there in my opinion. Feel free to ask questions in this thread....we have a ton of knowledge collectively and have probably run into any issue that you will come across.
 
20 some years ago, when I was first starting out as a bassist, I had an early 90s Peavey Foundation. It was my first bass that I owned myself, not counting the crummy Squier Bronco that I shared with my younger brother. But I was young and foolish enough at the time that I bought into the Fender hype and eventually traded it in for credit towards a Mexican P bass (which I still have and love, I just wish I hadn't been so eager to lose the Peavey).

I've been kicking myself for that decision now for years. I've also been keen to acquire a bass from the year I was born, 1984.

Last weekend I traded some shop time and soldering know-how to a fellow TB member, and wound up not only with a birth year bass but one that's awfully similar to that old Foundation.

View attachment 7000114

I knew that this was going to be a bit of a fixer upper project when I accepted it. There are some cosmetic issues, such as pitting on the metal Peavey logo "P" knobs and bridge plate, scuffs and dents in the body that are largely cosmetic, and those I can live with - they're just signs of a well loved and often played instrument.

The neck, however, needs some TLC to make it really playable. The frets on this are worn down enough that they may actually be the originals from 1984. I'll need to pull them and put in some new frets, but before I put in new ones, the gloss poly finish on the neck has spots where it's worn through or scuffed up, and has that slightly sticky feeling some gloss poly finishes tend to get after a while.

I haven't determined whether I'll strip the neck finish all the way down to the wood, or sand it down to a thin satin finish. That will depend on how deep the scuffs go. If I do take it all the way bare I'll refinish with Tru Oil.

Someone also adjusted the neck tiltback screw, making anything above the 15th fret unplayable unless the saddles are raised as high as they can go. So a full setup is in this bass's future as well. At the moment this has some D'Addario NYXL strings on it, I used the lower 4 strings of a 5 string set as it was already set up for BEAD tuning. The Super Ferrite pickup is a gem, I love how full and rich it sounds even for a single coil. It handles the low B remarkably well.

One interesting thing I noticed while inspecting it last night is that the maple neck is two pieces, joined at the center line - I don't think I've seen another neck built like this before!

View attachment 7000133

I'm excited to bring this bass up to its full potential. It may look like an old beater but aside from the wear and setup, it's a fine instrument.
I have gone ahead and issued you a member number.
@Isaac_James you are member #469
Welcome to the Club!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac_James
Congrats on your new to you bass. I hope you can fix the "ski jump" neck. Since it sounds like you will need a re fret anyway it shouldn't be an issue to level the board. The much maligned (some have actual hate for it!) neck tilt always gets the blame for this condition but i have 3 basses with the tilt neck and if used properly is the best thing since sliced bread IMHO.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac_James
Thanks for the warm welcome. The collected knowledge of the world wide bass community is something I've found useful again and again on this site, I'm glad to have found yet another corner of it.

I'm inexperienced with fret work but I've taught myself a number of other lutherie skills. With patience, attention, and the right tools I'm confident I can get this neck playing like a dream again.

Regarding this bass vs the T series - this bass is more or less a T-20 with a sleeker body shape, yeah? Looks like the same pickup in the same position. Bridge shape is a little different and I'm not sure about neck profile but otherwise they're just two different versions of the same basic idea, aren't they?
 
Thanks for the warm welcome. The collected knowledge of the world wide bass community is something I've found useful again and again on this site, I'm glad to have found yet another corner of it.

I'm inexperienced with fret work but I've taught myself a number of other lutherie skills. With patience, attention, and the right tools I'm confident I can get this neck playing like a dream again.

Regarding this bass vs the T series - this bass is more or less a T-20 with a sleeker body shape, yeah? Looks like the same pickup in the same position. Bridge shape is a little different and I'm not sure about neck profile but otherwise they're just two different versions of the same basic idea, aren't they?
Yes the T20 is similar in most respects with the major improvement being a significant weight reduction and improvement in comfort (in my opinion) with the sculptured body.

Some like the T20 better too. So it's all according to taste.:)
 
Yes the T20 is similar in most respects with the major improvement being a significant weight reduction and improvement in comfort (in my opinion) with the sculptured body.

Some like the T20 better too. So it's all according to taste.:)
That reminds me, I ought to put this thing on the scale and see how much it weighs. It doesn't feel unusually heavy or light to me, but I'm using a wide padded strap so I'm not sure. But it's definitely not a boat anchor.
 
It looks like the neck radius on this bass is 8", which is unusual. I currently have a 9.5" radius block, but the next smallest one I can find is 7.25". Am I out of luck if I want to find a block to sand this neck down with? Is this something I could make for myself? I have access to a pretty well equipped wood shop.

Google search isn't very helpful because I get lots of results for radius blocks that are 8" long, but none for an 8" radius curve.
 
Not for those basses, 8" was how they shipped. Radius was 12" on the T-20.
I'm confused what you mean by '8" was how they shipped". I got this figure from the owner's manual for the first generation Fury, pulled off Peavey's website. But I've been scratching my head since I know of no other instruments that have an 8" neck radius. I pulled out my radius gauge tools this morning and took a quick look, the 7.25" gauge is way off, while the 10" gauge looks very close if not bang on the money (I'll need to inspect a bit more closely when I have time tonight).

I have a 9.5" sanding block already, if that one will work I'll use it but I'm not opposed to getting another one with a radius closer to whatever this Fury neck has on it.
 

Attachments

I'm confused what you mean by '8" was how they shipped".
I mean exactly what I said.

Other makes and models may have board radius of 7.25", 9.5" or 10" and up, they are not Peavey Furys.

Someone at Peavey, either DeCola or Powers, looked at the Fury geometry; with particular regard between the chunky bridge and the blade inside the pickup. A decision was made that Fury fretboards have 8" radius and that was that; Fury basses left the factory with 8" radius boards.


Finding a Fury with a 7.25" or 14" board would be "unusual".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac_James
Hello - question to those that are the proud owners of the Peavey Foundation S bass (they have the P/J pickup setup and come in passive and active).

I would like to purchase a active version of the Foundation S bass but am coming up with little or no choice due to budget limitations. I am thinking of purchasing a passive bass and making it active.

My question to those owners of a passive Foundation S - even though it is passive and does not use a battery, is the battery cavity still in this bass?

Please let me know - thank you very much in advance - or if there are other suggestions, please share.
 
I opened the control cavity just to have a look. Seems like the jack was changed at some point maybe? You can see the slot where the battery would go in an active version and i assume the pre-amp board is shaped like the cut out in the cavity.
View attachment 6990196
I asked the question about the Foundation S if the passive ones still have a battery cavity and I see your passive has that, which makes me wonder, and those astute wise Peavey owners that may have amazing Peavey info and history on these basses - did they offer both passive and active, and if so, did they use the active bodies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
I asked the question about the Foundation S if the passive ones still have a battery cavity and I see your passive has that, which makes me wonder, and those astute wise Peavey owners that may have amazing Peavey info and history on these basses - did they offer both passive and active, and if so, did they use the active bodies?
Mine is an original passive version so I believe the bodies are the same. I think you would have no trouble fitting a preamp of your choice and a battery in the cavity of a passive version. If you find one, it's not a big deal to remove the cover and look so hopefully the seller would do this for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m-j and Bleecker
Now here's my kind of Peavey bass...2nd Gen Fury killer color with the black hardware/headstock!

https://reverb.com/item/84259269-peavey-fury-90-s-blue

Not much action these days, probably due to the "upgraded" format...hard to get used to, I'm not getting notifications to some of my watched threads, realized it yesterday.

Hope all you Peavey freaks are doing well!

Cheers!
 
Now here's my kind of Peavey bass...2nd Gen Fury killer color with the black hardware/headstock!

https://reverb.com/item/84259269-peavey-fury-90-s-blue

Not much action these days, probably due to the "upgraded" format...hard to get used to, I'm not getting notifications to some of my watched threads, realized it yesterday.

Hope all you Peavey freaks are doing well!

Cheers!
That is a really cool looking bass. 62 Blue? I love that blue. The black and black really makes the blue look even cooler.
 

Latest posts