• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

For the record, some T-45 necks will bolt right up to some T-40s. I say “some” because this was was a super tight fit and required some sanding. While other necks and bodies I have, had large gaps. I believe the toaster basses had slightly different pocket/heel dimensions compared to the later 40/45s with blades.

All I need to do is finish shaping the new Tusq nut and fine tuning the slot depths. And, I need to find some longer intonation screws for the A,D, & G.
6E308FCC-E188-4B4C-A981-88CABB8DC4DE.jpeg
670066AF-750E-41EE-8E38-5C61A437B6C9.jpeg
 
Nice one, grats.

Got a couple more smiles?....

'85 This black one is the creme de la creme of all the ones I've had over the years. And the only one that weighed in under 9 pounds (8lbs, 8oz exactly). I sold off the others but can't seem to let the last three go. Call me a hoarder if you like. ;)

View attachment 4139129
Another '85

View attachment 4139136
I have nothing but smiles!
I nudged a friend into a 86 Foundation Custom that was on GC's site from the Houston store. $330 with chainsaw case. It was black with the matching headstock and rosewood board, just like your '85. It came in and was a solid 9.5/10. Unbelievable amount of NOT wear. It only needed a small truss rod adjustment and it perfect. He's psyched, but I still asked for right of first refusal if it ever goes up for sale.

I also agree that the Foundation may be the best passive Peavey made.
 
I have nothing but smiles!
I nudged a friend into a 86 Foundation Custom that was on GC's site from the Houston store. $330 with chainsaw case. It was black with the matching headstock and rosewood board, just like your '85. It came in and was a solid 9.5/10. Unbelievable amount of NOT wear. It only needed a small truss rod adjustment and it perfect. He's psyched, but I still asked for right of first refusal if it ever goes up for sale.

I also agree that the Foundation may be the best passive Peavey made.
The Foundation gets my vote. :thumbsup::cool:
 
I don’t have time to make a lengthy post at the moment. But, I spoke with Bleecker about being cautious buying old Peavey bilaminate necks. Most of the ones I’ve put hands on have issues ranging from headstock tilt, splitting at the seam which weakens them dramatically, all the way to humped, split, and twisted.

Below are pics of a neck with headstock tilt and the method I use to check for twists.
E8C7D24F-7C3E-43E5-B8ED-CA09B1BB3E1F.jpeg
F8928B6E-3E4F-4812-A754-43DCC3F9B6B3.jpeg
 
I don’t have time to make a lengthy post at the moment. But, I spoke with Bleecker about being cautious buying old Peavey bilaminate necks. Most of the ones I’ve put hands on have issues ranging from headstock tilt, splitting at the seam which weakens them dramatically, all the way to humped, split, and twisted.

Below are pics of a neck with headstock tilt and the method I use to check for twists.View attachment 4141373View attachment 4141374

Thanks man! I appreciate the help.
Cheers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JEDI BASS
The peavey neck issues have really pushed me into the rosewood camp lately, since with the bilaminate design, the cap adds so much more rigidity to the structure. Ive only seen a couple rosewood necks go wonky at the seam, where as on maple necks its way more of a crapshoot in my experience
The worst neck I’ve seen has a Rosewood board. Split behind the nut at the bilam seam, has some headstock tilt, had (that’s HAD) a hump and a length wise twist. I heated out the hump and twist. But, it took a month with 24/7 heating pads on high wrapped in insulating blankets. Only after, did I realize the neck was weak and too easily flexed due to the bilam separation. The twisted neck guy said he could fix the separation and headstock tilt. I plan to send it, and the all maple with headstock tilt, to him soon.
 
The worst neck I’ve seen has a Rosewood board. Split behind the nut at the bilam seam, has some headstock tilt, had (that’s HAD) a hump and a length wise twist. I heated out the hump and twist. But, it took a month with 24/7 heating pads on high wrapped in insulating blankets. Only after, did I realize the neck was weak and too easily flexed due to the bilam separation. The twisted neck guy said he could fix the separation and headstock tilt. I plan to send it, and the all maple with headstock tilt, to him soon.

Welp, as they say, ymmv :bassist:
 
I've not had a problem with any of the 12 or 13 Peavey necks I've had/have, only one had a rosewood fretboard.
Solid, straight, good truss-rod adjustment...no problems.
Been lucky I guess.

I have had two with ski jump. Both had the bi laminated neck and maple fingerboards and both were on basses with improperly adjusted micro tilt. I agree with 58kites opinion that the micro tilt should not be used.