• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

@Templar Except for the HS logo I have nearly the same bass! The 0172xxxnumber seems to date it to 1984.
IMG_20200716_180248621.jpg
IMG_20200716_180259420.jpg
IMG_20200716_180310091.jpg
 
@Templar
Except for the HS logo I have nearly the same bass! The 0172xxxnumber seems to date it to 1984.
View attachment 4139033

Looks like a real nice example, grats.

Yeah the decal on mine is an oddity. Serial # dates it definitely to '84, but the decal is the style usually seen on later Foundations. I have a couple 85's that still have the early style decal. Go figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
All these pics of 83/84 Foundations really makes me smile!
(no bias at all, haha)
Here's my 84 the day I picked it up at GC.
View attachment 4139067

Nice one, grats.

Got a couple more smiles?....

'85 This black one is the creme de la creme of all the ones I've had over the years. And the only one that weighed in under 9 pounds (8lbs, 8oz exactly). I sold off the others but can't seem to let the last three go. Call me a hoarder if you like. ;)

IMG_0042.JPG

Another '85

IMG_0052.JPG
 
Y’all would start posting foundations the day I shipped my last one off!!

Anyways..... anyone else in the group do your own refrets, leveling, etc? I got bored and decided to make this T-45 neck play better. Oddly, of the 3 loose necks I have (2 T-40 and this T-45) this one fits my bodies’ neck pockets the best. I’m going to mount it on my 3TSB T-40 that has a super naturally relic’d all maple neck on it that doesn’t match the beauty of the body.
 

Attachments

  • FCDC2643-0587-4C10-BE95-0BC09267439F.jpeg
    FCDC2643-0587-4C10-BE95-0BC09267439F.jpeg
    618.9 KB · Views: 25
  • Like
Reactions: Iridescentone
  • Like
Reactions: Giffro
Who knows but the one in Jax was 350.00 in the case. It was a heck of a deal. I assume that is a different one and that would make exactly two I've seen in that color.

Fascinating (or not). According to the color chart Pearl Heather was offered on Foundations, but only on ones with a maple board. Same for Pearl Rose, maple boards only. Pearl White only for rosewood board Foundations. It also seems that the "pearl" finishes also included a matching headstock on Foundations (bonus!).

Apparently, fretless Foundations only came in Sunburst. Poor lefties, though....only black Foundations for them, evidently. I guess that's the price they pay for doing things backwards. :D;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
Yeah you should'a! I missed it, it was gone my 6:45 eastern time! Cool rare bass...Good for me or I would have missed the Foundy in "pearl rose"!

I'm not in the market for another slant Peavey, cool as they are. But you guys let that gold one slip by?...

Anyway, if your budget was too tight to snag both, then the Foundation was the better choice IMO. The early Foundations were the best passive basses Peavey ever made (YMMV). I'm thankful that I discovered them while they were still dirt cheap, which allowed me to buy a bunch and keep the best of the best for myself. Some day I'll trim down to just one. Meanwhile, I don't look for them anymore, because if I spot one in a custom color for cheap money....
 
Fascinating (or not). According to the color chart Pearl Heather was offered on Foundations, but only on ones with a maple board. Same for Pearl Rose, maple boards only. Pearl White only for rosewood board Foundations. It also seems that the "pearl" finishes also included a matching headstock on Foundations (bonus!).

Apparently, fretless Foundations only came in Sunburst. Poor lefties, though....only black Foundations for them, evidently. I guess that's the price they pay for doing things backwards. :D;)

For about twenty five dollars, they'd upcharge special requests