I do need a better cable management solution.
The board is one of those craft signs you can paint “LIVE LAUGH LOVE” on. Picked it up for a buck at a thrift store.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Here is mine, after sitting for a few hours with @TaySte_2000 i figured I need a Linden back in the mix. Not sure the octave would stay as I have no use in my current playing setup!
I’d like to check that out, always wanted to try the Punchline, and have an Element that I hate the sound of!Was great to meet you and I’m sorry for the bombardment of ideas at you
Element is killer though, shoot me a message if you want a link to the punchline ir that’s the core of my tone currently.
Got a few of those moogs on my watchlist currently![]()
Agreed! Posts like #24 and #52 really encompass a great ultra minimal board that just makes sense to me. Also things like the Tech21 Flyrigs & some signature pedals with tuners like the DP-3X and SH-1.I would think that with the existence and on-going development of multi-FX units these days; HX, Anagram, Quad Cortex etc, the "minimal" pedalboard could conceivably just be one box ... which would be pretty minimal. No ?
Although I do see folks here on TB that add other pedals to multi-FX boxes because apparently there are some things the multi-FX boxes just don't do very well, or to the users satisfaction.
Yes. I have and have had them. And yes there are things that they don’t do well. Also, I and many others want an option when playing live in the event other pedals or mfx units fail- or if I fail during menu diving. My favorite tool for a quick jam at home is a B1Four. Bigger board has a HxOne. But live I much prefer individual switches for the effects that I want. If that means 1-2 layers of drive, Octaver, chorus or filter, that’s 5 switches and then the mfx is stomp xl or bigger. And if it goes down, i usually have at least a DI with me.I would think that with the existence and on-going development of multi-FX units these days; HX, Anagram, Quad Cortex etc, the "minimal" pedalboard could conceivably just be one box ... which would be pretty minimal. No ?
Although I do see folks here on TB that add other pedals to multi-FX boxes because apparently there are some things the multi-FX boxes just don't do very well, or to the users satisfaction.
fair enough, but that would not really quality as a "ultra-minimal pedalboard" right ?Yes. I have and have had them. And yes there are things that they don’t do well. Also, I and many others want an option when playing live in the event other pedals or mfx units fail- or if I fail during menu diving. My favorite tool for a quick jam at home is a B1Four. Bigger board has a HxOne. But live I much prefer individual switches for the effects that I want. If that means 1-2 layers of drive, Octaver, chorus or filter, that’s 5 switches and then the mfx is stomp xl or bigger. And if it goes down, i usually have at least a DI with me.
80% is dirt + Zio after tuner and comp.
This is as minimal as I get with effects required. The compressors in the HXS are pretty good I think, and running the MXR M81 which is not colored at all I run an amp sim in the HXS. Not pictured is my Loopi pedal aux switch for switches 4/5. Using this to change modes in the HXS gives the option of running snapshots(scenes) or stomp mode for individual effects.fair enough, but that would not really quality as a "ultra-minimal pedalboard" right ?
I just watched the @IvanBassist vid about his new pretty minimal board. Cali76 => Anagram => Sushi Finally tube DI. Those are on a Metro 16 board.
That seems pretty minimal and it has a backup DI with the Finally box.
I am interested in all this because I'd like to get to a board that delivers what I need for FX/tone shaping and DI but it also very "minimal". So it's very instructive to read about all the approaches. The Anagram seems like a good (mostly) all in one to me, but I am watching and waiting for some of the kinks to be worked out before I seriously consider that route.
It’s a Nano boardfair enough, but that would not really quality as a "ultra-minimal pedalboard" right ?
I just watched the @IvanBassist vid about his new pretty minimal board. Cali76 => Anagram => Sushi Finally tube DI. Those are on a Metro 16 board.
That seems pretty minimal and it has a backup DI with the Finally box.
I am interested in all this because I'd like to get to a board that delivers what I need for FX/tone shaping and DI but it also very "minimal". So it's very instructive to read about all the approaches. The Anagram seems like a good (mostly) all in one to me, but I am watching and waiting for some of the kinks to be worked out before I seriously consider that route.
Your new enclosure for the Spark is
Thank you, sir!Your new enclosure for the Spark is's kiss.
pedalnetics.com