TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Somebody gave it to me…I want a second. It’s a bit of a ventriloquist: I have it parked near my sofa but the sound appears to be emanating from the TV 10 feet away.This guy gets it.
This is an important point. It simply isn't true that 15" speakers have some particular kind of sound that can't be had from 10's or 12's -- it all depends on the particular cabinet(s). Just because you aren't enamored of your current cab (with 12" speaker) doesn't mean you should go in search of a 15. For example, a 2x10 would move about the same amount of air as a 1x15, and you might well like any particular 2x10 better than any particular 1x15.It sort of sounds like you're assigning a certain 'sound' to a particular speaker diameter. IME, it doesn't really work that way. But I also think a music store with as many old marginal cabs as the ones you listed would probably be pretty well motivated to make you a screaming deal, just to move one of those things out of inventory.
+1...I am always surprised (and very pleased) at the effect when I add a second identical cab.REV's post mirrors my thoughts exactly. A stacked pair's tone can be surprisingly different than a single. Fuller and "beefier" due to speaker coupling.
Anyway, best of luck in your search and I hope it works out.



The choices that am happily living with fifteen-wise are:Well, for one thing I'm certainly not trying to take up more space and add another cab to the picture. My early rigs were a single 15" of some sort, that's the sound I know, that's the sound I like. It's the sound I always come back too. I've done 4x10, 2x10, 2x12, all decent but just not my bag.
2x15 would be the shizznitt but I don't need to move that much air recording at home.
Nice, congratulations.
tomato tomahto potato potahto
So I got the Mesa 1x15 today. Cheap cash deal out the door. Played it back to back with the SVT-15EN and homebrew with the EVM-15L. I didn't even try the others because they were rat fur specials except the Ashdown, which was MIC, which I can't get on board with from anybody. The Ampeg was a US built one, and sounded darker/dull to me. The homebrew cab was similar to the Mesa (see below) but was lacking in the lows. The Mesa was kind of in the sweet spot, where the clarity was great while sounding full enough for me in the low and low mids. I think the Thiele design helps make this a no brainer. The amp was a new Laney Digbeth set flat w/ very mild gain settings.
I popped it open and found a 400w EVM-15L inside. It looked like no one had ever opened it, I assume this is mostly likely the stock speaker. It fits in the spot the 12" lived, and I didn't have to stack more crap (another cab? F no) in an otherwise full room. Thanks for the valuable and non-valuable input, you don't have to go home but feel free to come back and tell me I really need three Phil Jones 16x8's to feel and experience the perceived nonsense living in everyone else's head except my own preferred perceived nonsense. I like my nonsense better, at least it doesn't smell as bad.
View attachment 7109570
View attachment 7109569
Note that the “400 W” EV driver is only good for about 250-300 watts RMS.
The driver was originally rated at 200 watts RMS but was later changed by using a different rating system rather than any meaningful changes to the driver components themselves, just an adhesive update.
I know you believe that but it’s not true. All EVM speakers were tested using EIA RS426 standard which was done for a minimum of 8 hours. In actual practice, the testing was started at the end of the work day and allowed to run overnight so it was over 12 hours in duration. Yes - adhesives were changed as better ones became available, but EV would not have used the rating if the product didn’t pass the tests.Note that the “400 W” EV driver is only good for about 250-300 watts RMS.
The driver was originally rated at 200 watts RMS but was later changed by using a different rating system rather than any meaningful changes to the driver components themselves, just an adhesive update.
We will have to disagree.I know you believe that but it’s not true. All EVM speakers were tested using EIA RS426 standard which was done for a minimum of 8 hours. In actual practice, the testing was started at the end of the work day and allowed to run overnight so it was over 12 hours in duration. Yes - adhesives were changed as better ones became available, but EV would not have used the rating if the product didn’t pass the tests.
We will have to disagree.
In practice for MI bass guitar applications they didn’t hold up mechanically with 400 watt RMS rated power amps. At lower power levels however, they were great speakers. Remember that were one of EV’s larger OEM customers, and when they started pushing back on warranty returns/claims, we had to shift to a more appropriate driver.
For PA use, properly high passed, they were also ok, especially for full range applications, but not for subwoofer use… the EVX was a much better choice IME.
That said, the 15L remains one of my all time favorite drivers for lower powered
Yes - the EVX with its 4-inch voice coil is a much better choice for subwoofer use. That’s what it was designed for. The 15L was actually designed for guitar use, but when bass players heard it’s more extended range they liked it too. Maybe some day we can have a more detailed discussion about other nuances that came into play here.We will have to disagree.
In practice for MI bass guitar applications they didn’t hold up mechanically with 400 watt RMS rated power amps. At lower power levels however, they were great speakers. Remember that were one of EV’s larger OEM customers, and when they started pushing back on warranty returns/claims, we had to shift to a more appropriate driver.
For PA use, properly high passed, they were also ok, especially for full range applications, but not for subwoofer use… the EVX was a much better choice IME.
That said, the 15L remains one of my all time favorite drivers for lower powered applications.
The RH-115 simply will not make usable low end. I went through the MM phase 10 years ago. Discovered that the heads depend on some components that are near to un-obtanium and regardless of driver (JBL, Gauss, EV) that cab simeolynwouldn't go deep.There's nothing to recommend the JBL MI-15, nor a Sonic cab for that matter, which would probably be mismatched to the driver in any case. If the Music Man has the original driver in it, that's probably the better choice. If it doesn't, I'd give them both a pass. Better cabs will come along.