I see. There have probably been plenty of market studies on that.In most cases, top mounted controls are also hard to see.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I see. There have probably been plenty of market studies on that.In most cases, top mounted controls are also hard to see.

like to see many more mini amps with the controls on top
In most cases, top mounted controls are also hard to see.
I have a good reason why this isn't a good idea and also why it's not likely to happen.How about a combo amp with an integrated wireless receiver, comes with a fob transmitter that has an integrated tuner and mute, and the fob slides into a storage/charging slot in the amp. Combo has storage for an integrated power cord too.
Goal is to minimize setup at the gig, no separate cords - plug power cord into wall, pop transmitter into bass, switch on, tune up,... downbeat.
Also, a frequency-adjustable HPF should become the standard, de-facto first knob of every amp head's EQ section.
I have a good reason why this isn't a good idea and also why it's not likely to happen.
For those experienced with wireless applications in pro audio, the lessons learned were painfully costly as band after band of legal frequencies were taken away from our use. This resulted in millions of dollars worth of wireless equipment becoming illegal to use. How would you, or most players feel if they could no longer use or even sell their amp due to becoming , regulatory obsolete?
The second reason is that when a wireless system is added to a bass amp, it changes the regulatory classification to "intentional radiator" which requires additional, very costly certification. Since different regions use different frequency bands, each configuration would require additional costly regulatory testing and certification. The bass amp market is not large enough to support such costs IME.
Well, that dream is thoroughly destroyed....
I suspect adjustable HPFs becoming as common as, say, parametric mid-freq controls... that might be more doable, no?