MAJOR METAL said:The Borg CNC Nino's bodies and necks so you will get consistant quality.![]()
As it does for Sadowsky basses as well. Resistance is futile!
Personally, I would like to own both a Sadowsky and a Valenti =)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
MAJOR METAL said:The Borg CNC Nino's bodies and necks so you will get consistant quality.![]()
As would everyone elseMarcus Alan said:Personally, I would like to own both a Sadowsky and a Valenti =)
MAJOR METAL said:As much as I like Nino and Respect his work they dont feel or sound like a Sadowsky bass to me. The Borg CNC Nino's bodies and necks so you will get consistant quality.![]()
mark beem said:Are you suggesting Sadowsky bodies aren't CNC'd???
![]()
BassJunkie730 said:Are you also suggesting that Sad's aren't consistent?
Hmmm, Major you're going to need to clarify this statement or ambiguity may give rise to latent design ignorance.
MAJOR METAL said:No , where did you get that from ?

MAJOR METAL said:Sadowsky Basses are by far the most consitent basses I have played from one builder thus far. In regards to the Borg Cutting Nino's necks and bodies I was trying to point out that they are very high quality and consistent and even though they dont play or sound like a Sadowsky they are still very nice.![]()
Peter Parker said:With a few more posts on how the Valenti is as good or better than a Sadowsky the wheels on the whole Sadowsky mystique are going to fall off. Maybe folks will finally understand that it's not hard at all to bolt together a quality bass using quality parts. Spend just a little time and anyone can learn how to set-up a bass to play however they like. Very simple actually. ***In no way am I trying to knock Nino in my comments. I'm not really trying to knock Sadowsky either but I know it reads that way.***
gfried84 said:I disagree with the last post. It is by no means "easy" to bolt a neck and body together and get the type of results that Nino or Roger get from their basses. If that were the case both would be out of business. Skills like that are learned over time. Ask Nino or Roger how much time and money they spent to get results like they do now. I've played both basses numerous times and both are top quality instruments.
Peter Parker said:With a few more posts on how the Valenti is as good or better than a Sadowsky the wheels on the whole Sadowsky mystique are going to fall off. Maybe folks will finally understand that it's not hard at all to bolt together a quality bass using quality parts. Spend just a little time and anyone can learn how to set-up a bass to play however they like. Very simple actually. ***In no way am I trying to knock Nino in my comments. I'm not really trying to knock Sadowsky either but I know it reads that way.***
AJ Brown said:What you're saying is that it's easy (perhaps trivial, judging by your comments) to assemble as good quality of bass as Roger and Nino put out. I would disagree, as it's the attention to details (wiring, custom touches, tight fit and finish) that make the package so desirable. Not everyone has the knowledge, or patience for that matter, to do it the right way. Haven't you ever heard of the adage "If it were that easy everyone would be doing it..."?
AJ Brown said:What you're saying is that it's easy (perhaps trivial, judging by your comments) to assemble as good quality of bass as Roger and Nino put out. I would disagree, as it's the attention to details (wiring, custom touches, tight fit and finish) that make the package so desirable. Not everyone has the knowledge, or patience for that matter, to do it the right way. Haven't you ever heard of the adage "If it were that easy everyone would be doing it..."?
Peter Parker said:With a few more posts on how the Valenti is as good or better than a Sadowsky the wheels on the whole Sadowsky mystique are going to fall off. Maybe folks will finally understand that it's not hard at all to bolt together a quality bass using quality parts.
I would hope the quality of the Sadowsky and Valenti for that matter is higher than a Fender. Fender build thousands upon thousands of basses a year and therefore can't afford to put the amount of time roger and nino are afforded due to there relatively small market. Given the fact the average guy here is not going to build thousands of basses at once he/she should be able to put the same amount of time in their own Warmoth/USCG project and achieve great results. I guess I choose to believe the average person more capable than some of you seem to feel.BartmanPDX said:If this were true, I would expect that more companies would be able to pull it off. I've played many Jazz basses from many manufacturers, and none is as nice as my Sadowsky. Therefore, I can only assume that it IS indeed somewhat of a challenge to make a Jazz bass that is truly outstanding. My guess is that most companies are so concerned with production that they cut corners in some areas to save time and money. Sadowsky and Nino don't do that.
If I had found, say, an MIA Fender that played and sounded as good as my Sadowsky, I would have gladly bought it and saved myself $1k.
As always, IMO, YMMV.
Holy crap... Get over yourself!!!!! "I'm a builder.. wah, wah, wah." Are you jealous cause I use kits and sell basses and you build from scratch, and do what, not sell 'em? Grow up!!!!Peter Parker said:It's pretty when a cavity has nice wiring, doesn't effect playability and usually not the tone. As far as tight fit and finish, USACG and their finishers are to be thanked for that as well as whoever does Roger's basses. Both do a good job at assembly for sure. I think everyone would be doing it if they realized how easy it truly is. It seems most folks on here don't give themselves enough credit. They've been told for years how hard it is and they just believe it without ever trying. I can see their hesitation, it's not cheap to get these parts in finished form to assemble themselves; pretty costly experiment if they fail. Do you rememer when neckthrough basses all cost so much more than a bolt-on and were only found in the high end makes? Everyone thought that it was because NT's were so much more difficult to build than bolt-on's thereby making them cost more. Now there are all kinds of very cheap NT's out there and as a builder i find NT's just as easy or maybe even a little easier than a bolt-on. I suppose from a mass production stand point at one time NT's were more difficult but not so anymore.