• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

VERY Interesting article on the Guitar's Demise.....

Any opinions as to why that is? I have my ideas on he subject.....

The decline of electric guitar sales seems to reflect the decline of the instrument in popular music. That seems very clear. If you make hammers and then suddenly everyone makes things with 3D printers your business is going to suffer. That is a trite comparison I admit. But there is 2 other issues that the the article doesnt address.

1) guitars are a durable good or at least a pretty durable good. If you dont create more guitarists at some point you will reach a level of market saturation. You then have to convince people to buy multiple guitars. But most people are not collectors or will always have a limit to how many guitars they will own. A guitar can last a lifetime so you need to continue to make new guitarists.

2) related to #1 you have to reach new guitarists with current and future technology. Kids through people in their 30s play games on consols, ipads, phones and computers for hours a day. Rocksmith is probably the best example of this. Fender, GC, guitar companies and the music publishing companies should be falling over themselves to make rocksmith as popular of madden. Instead only gibson signed up and publishers are difficult to licence with. Every GC should have a rocksmith demo.
 
Maybe if Fender or Gibson reached out to Tosin, supported him, made new instruments with him, and used their marketing power to push him out there, he could become a "mainstream superstar".

Or they could just print up some more Slash instore standups and do twice as well.

Slash-RockMisc.png
38812_0.jpg
 
This argument bugs me. Sure, there are lots of YouTube creators recording for fun in the basement, but let's not discount that there are also lots of YouTube musicians making a solid living off their music. Maybe being a YouTube musician playing in a music video of your own in your basement doesn't sound cool to you, but to me (25 years old, by the way) that sounds tremendously cool. It's low key but is a lot of fun to do, and it can reach a worldwide audience. Just remember that being a "rockstar" to some people doesn't mean standing on the stage at a stadium concert...it might mean putting out a cool video that you recorded in your bedroom.

I think there is a difference between "rock star" and "corporate rock millionaire"....theres a lot of "rock stars" out there but, these days, some still have to work part time flipping burgers to make ends meet...."corporate rock millionaires" who have made large livings primarily off their music, their brand/band touring the world in busses with built in jacuzzis and stripper poles (and merch sales are the 'bonus', not the primary source of income) are the dying breed
 
This article ticks me off. I get it, a lot of the "Guitar Gods" have turned into old farts who aren't inspiring a generation of young kids to pick up a Fender or Gibson, but to sit around complaining that there aren't any new "Guitar Heros" is just absurd. There are certainly thousands of worthy "Guitar Heros" out there, recording and touring TODAY. Just because you don't like the style of music they make doesn't mean that they're not equally (if not more) worthy of those titles.

I know I'm just an edgy metalhead, but the type of people who push these stories are completely leaving out every genre that doesn't suit their sensibilities. When I try to think of guitarists with the power to inspire a generation, I don't think of Taylor Swift, I think of Misha Mansoor. Maybe if Fender wanted to get some of their sales back they should think about that.

I'm somewhat with you. I'm a metalhead. I agree there are thousands of worthy guitar heroes. However, no one knows who they are (in the mainstream). At the time, whether you liked the music or not, everyone knew who Clapton or Hendrix was. Whether you liked the music or not, you knew who Eddie Van Halen was. Whether you liked the music or not, you knew who Slash was. Today? Who is it? You mentioned Misha Mansoor. I had to look that up. Dude looks like he's an outtanding musician...but he's not a superstar. He's not Taylor Swift. He's not EVH. He's a fantastic musician in a niche market. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not going to distill through the masses to get more people interested in playing guitar. It's going to distill through the underground and get some people interested in playing the guitar. That's reality. Misha may have the power/ability to inspire a generation, but if a generation doesn't hear him or doesn't want to listen to him, then that power won't be used in that way.
 
Maybe if Fender or Gibson reached out to Tosin, supported him, made new instruments with him, and used their marketing power to push him out there, he could become a "mainstream superstar".

Tosin works with Ibanez, which is not an endorsement to shrug off, but Ibanez isn't Fender.

It doesn't matter who pushes him, the masses don't want to listen to his music. I want to listen to his music. You want to listen to his music. Most people don't. Thus, no matter who endorses him, he won't be a superstar.
 
I think there is a difference between "rock star" and "corporate rock millionaire"....theres a lot of "rock stars" out there but some still have to work part time flipping burgers to make ends meet...."corporate rock millionaires" who have made large livings primarily off their music and brand/band are the dying breed
Definitely agree. I'd go further and say the corporate rock millionaire is a dead bread. Long dead.
 
Youtube pays approx $1,750 for 1 million views. You could rack up 10 million views - a feat equivalent to hitting the sun with a hand-tossed snowball -- and still not make a poverty wage.

Incidentally, my girl just saw an artist at the Troubadour who boasts 17 million Youtube views. She says the place was nearly empty.

Well stated.
 
From a numbers perspective, there are more guitar players now, of course, there are more of everything, every day.

This is more about poor management of companies, fueled by short-sighted MBAs trained to think that every business could be capable of double digit growth forever, who are hopefully long gone when the price is to be paid. At heart, this is a business article, not one on the arts.
 
I'd love to see a Taylor Swift cutout at a guitar store. I'd be willing to exist such a thing doesn't exist, and if it did exist, everyone who sees it would think it's a joke. Swift can play guitar, and props to her, that's cool, but shes not Slash (which for some reason we're referring to in this thread).

As the article detailed, Taylor is the biggest driving force in guitar sales at the moment, at least according to the CEO of Fender.

Taylor Guitars is even experiencing a bit of a renaissance based solely on the surname.

There is no Taylor Swift cutout at the guitar store because there are as of yet no signature guitars bearing her name. This oversight in potential revenue will likely be corrected in the near future.