TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So what configuration passive/active is considered the definitive "Wal" sound. I always thought active but going through this thread makes me think I might be wrong.
So what configuration passive/active is considered the definitive "Wal" sound. I always thought active but going through this thread makes me think I might be wrong.
All but a couple custom Mark are active preamps. There is no passive/active switch on these preamps.
Early discussion was about a guy who acquired recently a rare Mk I passive bass. Believe too it was made intentionally shallow perhaps for weight reasons, so if he wanted to put the Wal preamp, that wouldn't be possible since it wouldn't fit.
Now the Pro's, come in different flavors so there are passive and actives ones the "e" indicates if its active.
The Customs are defintely active all the time reguardless of knob position. I know because of a cap failure. The bass was dead and no passive position to keep playing it until it was repaired.
On the rosewood converted fretless, I would seriously consider an epoxy coating since rosewood is so soft.
Here is my Wal W2564.
I have had problems with the front and back facings coming up at the edges.
Fixed now.
Silver birch facingsView attachment 328267.
bkbirge said:So what configuration passive/active is considered the definitive "Wal" sound. I always thought active but going through this thread makes me think I might be wrong.
Here is a great site Trevor Ragatt has been putting together. Lots of Wal history you can read about there.
http://www.walbasshistory.blogspot.co.uk/
Nedsbassman, you get club #60
Here is my Wal W2564.
I have had problems with the front and back facings coming up at the edges.
Fixed now.
Silver birch facingsView attachment 328267.