• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wal Bass Club.

Don't you forget "WAL LERS" , Bass42 is a WAL addicted guy ! And he's always trying to buy some ! If you want to sell some of your basses to pay a new home, marriage and a new car and bla bla .... do not hesitate and send a PM ! LOL ! You guys really have the best WALS i'd ever seen ! LOL
 
Some pics of my Geddy Lee bass :

images2npa.jpg


photo2ath.jpg


photo1ich.jpg
 
In tone no so much difference, but MKII body balance is much better than MKI !

The mkii...doesn't sit right on my knee...the cutaway is so severe that there isn't enough wood after that to make it comfortable...I don't remember the mk I having this issue since it offers a nice full curve ...both basses are fighting a slight neck dive....maybe I don't have a wal type knee?
 
zazz said:
The mkii...doesn't sit right on my knee...the cutaway is so severe that there isn't enough wood after that to make it comfortable...I don't remember the mk I having this issue since it offers a nice full curve ...both basses are fighting a slight neck dive....

I feel the same way. Sitting, the MkI is very comfortable, the II is not and has more neck dive with that short horn.
Standing, they're both the same for me.
 
I love my 5-string Mark IIs and am about to install Hipshot Ultralites on them to counter the neck-heaviness. This will require the small holes for the set-screws. Paul reports that if I ever switch back to the MS4s the holes will be covered and not seen.

Am I crazy to do this?

Yes ! Do not do this !
 
The mkii...doesn't sit right on my knee...the cutaway is so severe that there isn't enough wood after that to make it comfortable...I don't remember the mk I having this issue since it offers a nice full curve ...both basses are fighting a slight neck dive....maybe I don't have a wal type knee?

I'm talking about stand playing !
 
I guess the question to ask yourself; is the weight issue in the body end or the headstock end?
The two 5'vers I had (or one I have in the case now), neither was headstock heavy at all, no neck dive standing. My current one is heavy in the body, so the headstock wants to point up!

Asthetically, I love the 'big ear' tuners, and I don't like the look of the Hipshots on the MkIII's.
 
I guess the question to ask yourself; is the weight issue in the body end or the headstock end?
The two 5'vers I had (or one I have in the case now), neither was headstock heavy at all, no neck dive standing. My current one is heavy in the body, so the headstock wants to point up!

Asthetically, I love the 'big ear' tuners, and I don't like the look of the Hipshots on the MkIII's.

Thanks for your thoughts! Although I'm fairly decided on the switch, I thought learning fellow Wal owners' opinions would be good medicine.

Both of mine are headstock heavy. I've had them for 20 years and purchased a couple of Mark IIIs, fretted and fretless pair, due to the weight. Switching to Ultralites takes 3/4 lbs. off the headstock! Although my Mark IIs are heavy, it wouldn't be such a problem if the neck heaviness wasn't so prevalent.

There really isn't any downside unless one considers it a modification that diminishes value. This doesn't worry me. I really don't plan on selling and if I did, a buyer just has to consider the benefit gained in playability over the idea that it is a modification. Ultimately, for me, it's the playibility...these are instruments of creativity, not to be closet queens due to the discomfort of use. If I did sell and took a loss due to the switch, well in the meantime I would have enjoyed playing them that much more and would have paid for it!