There's this bass I'm going to order at the end of the year (as a reward for quitting smoking) from a luthier.
He said the default weight for this model is 4.7 kg (10.4 lbs), but he could chamber the body to make mine weight 4 kg (8.8 lbs).
Do you think I should confirm my request to have him chamber the body in order to reduce the weight?
My experience with weight:
- I've got a Ovation Magnum II, I don't play it any longer because of its weight
- I don't know the weight of my G&L L2000 Tribute, all I know is that it's prefectly acceptable
- One of the reasons why I love my Acinonyx is because it is so lightweight at 3.5 kg (6.6 lbs)
My experience with chamber body: a few years ago, a friend made me a custom bass with a very dense wood, so the first version sounded good but it was too heavy for me. My friend then chambered the body, and this made a big difference in weight. But i think it also changed the sound significantly: I've had the feeling that the new bass being chambered sounded a bit "hollow", with a not so pleasant resonance. But it's hard to compare a sound you have now with a sound from my memory. It didn't dare to complain to my friend about the sound, after asking him to do the painful extra work of chambering the instrument.
So I'm afraid for the new bass, that if I ask to the luthier to chamber the instrument, it could alter the sound.
> Do you think 4.7 kg (10.4 lbs) is an average/ok weight, or do you think it's on the heavy side?
> Do you think that chambering the body might alter the sound significantly or not so much? The friend who built my first custom bass is really an amateur luthier, so maybe he didn't have the skill to do a good chambering, I could expect from the pro luthier of my next project to do a much better job of chambering without altering the sound too much?
What would you do if you were me?
[EDIT] On the positive side, even 10.4 lbs is not super heavy for a Les Paul shaped bass. I'm almost sure that the real Gibson Les Paul bass it's inspired from weights much more then that!