TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
After reading it I have to say that it's not one of his better books. Not bad, just not up to his usual standard.
Thanks for the warning.
Creepy cover award of the year.
What were they thinking?
Ew.
It'd be funny?
Thanks for the warning.
You're reading Inherent Vice?
No, and after a description like that, I'm sure I won't. I can't stand Doritos.
Fair enough. I'd still recommend checking out Mason & Dixon, but if you don't enjoy authors having fun with writing you might not dig it.
Just liberated this from the local book store:
![]()
See y'all in about two weeks.
Recently finished God's War by Kameron Hurley, which is in interesting sci-fi novel that sucked me in due to the fact that the author just drops you right into the action with no inital clue as to the world she built, which is just different enough to make you wonder what's going on.
Not sure what I'm going to read next. I have a few that I started but set aside for one reason or another:
The Rolling Stones by Robert Heinlein
Flag in Exile by David Weber
Catalyst by Paul Byers
The Keep by F. Paul Wilson
I finished it about ten minutes ago.just have tio finish Field Gray, Philip Kerr's new novel
Naming minor characters after obscure people who actually existed in different points in history in ways that are supposed to be "witty" or something. The average reader wouldn't know this, so apparently you're supposed to feel "cool" that you and the author are so educated as to be in on the joke together. Apparently, the author is so bored with the constraints he's working under that he puts little Easter eggs in his stories to break the monotony.So what's the silly game? I can't take the suspense.
Naming minor characters after obscure people who actually existed in different points in history in ways that are supposed to be "witty" or something. The average reader wouldn't know this, so apparently you're supposed to feel "cool" that you and the author are so educated as to be in on the joke together. Apparently, the author is so bored with the constraints he's working under that he puts little Easter eggs in his stories to break the monotony.
I actually find this childish nonsense more annoying than clumsy product placement whoring in fiction (incredible, but sadly true).
At least there's money in the latter which is an excuse. There's none for the former.