I'm sure the 1980's wouldn't have been kind to a lot of those guys. Armani suits, Live Aid and dodgy MTV videos.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Had Jimi lived, I think we would have seen & heard jazz/funk/rock fusion several years sooner
By "we" do you mean rock audiences crossing over? Mahavishu Orchestra was up and running by 1971 and Bitches Brew was 1969
I'm gonna be that guy.
Morrison was very heavily assisted by good PR, and a solid backing band. On stuff like The Soft Parade he did 50-60 vocal takes to get a single composite track completed and even then the result was not well received.
At best he would be doing casinos.
Hendrix, on the other hand, was on the verge of inventing either disco or 70s funk when he passed. Either would have been interesting. No idea what would have come after, but it would have been awesome.
Think what would have been if John were still alive, or George, or Paul?
I'm gonna be that guy.
Morrison was very heavily assisted by good PR, and a solid backing band. On stuff like The Soft Parade he did 50-60 vocal takes to get a single composite track completed and even then the result was not well received.
At best he would be doing casinos.
Hendrix, on the other hand, was on the verge of inventing either disco or 70s funk when he passed. Either would have been interesting. No idea what would have come after, but it would have been awesome.
I've read on several threads something to the effect that music would have been different had some artist survived, such as Buddy Holly, Elvis Presley, Kurt Cobain, Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Duane Allman, etc.
I've thought about this and think I fundamentally disagree. I believe that fans of these revolutionary artists would have liked some of the new material, not liked others of it, been indifferent/critical/etc. but that there would likely be no fundamental change in music had such artists survived.
So, for example, when I consider Bob Dylan, Keith Richards, Pete Townshend, Paul McCartney, Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder, Grace Slick, Elvis Costello, Glyn Johns, George Martin, Gregg Allman, Paul Simon, Neil Young, etc., I believe that they made their initial enormous contributions and then maybe did some great work, some mediocre work, some interesting work, but nothing that rivaled what their initial contributions to the course of music.
Anyway, I'm interested in what others have to say. Obviously, this is all speculation, as there is currently no way to change history and see what would have happened if....
Okay, I have donned my fireproof underwear for this one. So before you start screaming at me, I've heard it all, but it has had no effect.
Most of the posts here I agree with, except Hendrix. Yes, he was an innovator and a showman, but he was not the musician he gets credit for being. I'm not saying he was bad. I'm saying he was a one trick pony who did a new trick better than anyone else. In his time he was hailed as the world's greatest guitarist. I think that is an over statement and then some. I think he was very skilled at what he did, but not all that versatile.
I believe, had he survived, he would be next week's act at the Backwash County Casino.