I am bluegrasser who also plays jazz, rock, blues, folk, reggae and jamrock (GD).
Upright bass has room filling propulsion amidst other acoustic instruments that electric basses seems to drown out.
I am no purist - but using the right tools in the right context has merit.
But so called "bluegrass Nazi's" are common in the Bay Area and it's best not to ruffle feathers when one is depended upon to, as some one here so eloquently stated: "drive the train," when playing bluegrass bass.
About 10 years ago I worked at a (now defunct) guitar store in Berkeley called the 5th String. The owner's at the time were aware that the local community shopped at this store because of they stocked the sort of instruments favored by bluegrass purists: Martin's with Spruce, (preferably Adirondack Spruce) tops with mahogany or rosewood backs and sides and the typical range of maple and spruce mandos and Gibson Banjos in all the typical flavors (walnut, mahogany or maple).
Anytime the store buyer veered from the tried and true bluegrass formula at the higher end of the range for each instrument these instruments would not sell.
Some of these instruments were kick-ass axes but the traditionalists wouldn't buy em.
I wound up being given a custom Martin D-35 built on the same specs as a Signature Ernest Tubb Model sans the bells & whistles lapiz lazuli inlay...
The guitar I was given is worth roughly 4 grand but no trad bluegrasser would buy it because of it's "Italian Alpine Spruce Top and Forward Shifted Bracing.".
I love it and it kicks ass over my more desirable to the bluegrass crowd Herringbone D28.
Go figure
Silvertone: Thanks for the employee perspective.
However you don't have to be a "Bluegrass Nazi" to be responsible for the conclusions you have drawn. My thoughts:
- there is no need to buy a high end Gibson banjo. They had the same tonerings and hardware as the basic Mastertone models. Why pay more for fancier inlay designs and purfling? Common sense.
- re the Martin D-35: No D-35 I have heard comes close to the balance between the ringing high notes and powerful lows of the Herringbone D-28. That great balance is what bluegrass guitar players want when they have to be part of a band. A guitar player doing strictly solo work would not choose a Herringbone. The right tool for the right job....at the right price. A Herringbone D-28 costs well under 3 grand.
So I would suggest that other factors are at work here. There are practical reasons for buying the standard bluegrass instruments.
Things are changing though. Guitars made by Gallagher, Collings, Bourgeois and other small companies are also seen a lot by bluegrass guitarists. Same as banjos eg Huber, Neat, Sullivan, Arthur Hatfield etc. However, the models that closely resemble the dimensions of Gibsons and Martins appear to be the most popular. There may be a bit of a traditionalist argument there but it also shows that the players of today are willing to look for a different sound from their instruments.
Same thing with basses. There are lots of Kays still in circulation. I would agree that the reason for that is more likely to be "traditionalism" because there are a lot better -sounding plywood basses available today. Even though SPBGMA wants no part of electric basses, non-traditional double basses are common.
Last edited:
