• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What's so special about John Entwistle?

Even though you can see his intensity at times ... mostly he looked bored and like he was just cruisin' while teaching the world how rock bass should be.
Like in videos where the other are trashing the stage .... he looks like he just waiting for a cup of tea.
 
I'm not the biggest rock fan out there, but I can see why people like John Paul Jones, John Deacon, Geezer Butler and the likes.

I can even see why people like Cliff Burton, although I think he's seriously overrated.


But I don't understand why John Entwistle is so highly regarded here on TalkBass and in the media. I listened to The Who's top songs on Spotify and watched a few videos on YouTube. Sure, he has that sort of tapping technique and a few fills on "My Generation," but is that it? I guess he did come before Jones et al., making him a pioneer?

I'm being serious here. I'm not trolling. What am I missing?



He kept Keith Moon in line and on time, and gave some bottom end to the song, which if you listen to just Townshend, the songs need some meat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BergerHead
About a year after I started playing, I got it in my head to learn the bass line from " Real Me, and like legions of bassists before me, it Kicked My Ass. If you listen to him live, he never played it the same way twice, pretty much a serial improviser within the frame of the tune. He hit the fundamentals when it was necessary, and the rest of the time he's weaving in and out. Persona-wise, his unflappable calm while surrounded by the epic histrionics and hissy-fit antics of his bandmates was the original cliche' of the Stoic Bassist.
 
I'm much more likely to be listening to Bach or Haydn these days, having just "discovered" classical music, but I've listened to and played Rock all my life. I remember sitting in my bedroom when I was 12, trying to play along with Live at Leeds and Quadrophenia on my brother's Jazz Bass. Entwistle was a huge influence on my Bass life.
 
His sound on all of "Who's Next" is my all-time favorite "P-Bass-with-roundwounds" sound. Fat and compressed, with only a HINT of the "piano strings" thing. Lots of sustain. At some point, I realized that I had been chasing that sound for years, without consciously crediting Entwistle.
To me, some of his later tone is ludicrously bright and clanky... maybe he was losing his hearing. But Townshend said that Entwistle's big contribution was his huge output of overtones... every guitar/bass/drums trio (Cream, Hendrix, U2, Police, Zeppelin, etc.) has had to solve the problem of how to sound full, and that was Entwistle's method.
 
I was never a big fan of the Who myself, just moderately interested as I grew up. But when I listen to some of their live tracks now I find myself saying, "wow, I hear a lot of Geddy, Billy, Steve, Geezer, Dug and every other popular bassist from the last 40 years in his playing". Then it hits me.....I've got it backwards.... I hear HIS playing in all of them!!!! He truly was a pioneer that everyone else incorporated into their own style. He may be one of the most influential ever really. He's just that good. Like I said, I'm not even a Who fan....but I sure respect John's playing no matter who he would have played with.
All IMHO of course
 
I'm not the biggest rock fan out there, but I can see why people like John Paul Jones, John Deacon, Geezer Butler and the likes.

I can even see why people like Cliff Burton, although I think he's seriously overrated.


But I don't understand why John Entwistle is so highly regarded here on TalkBass and in the media. I listened to The Who's top songs on Spotify and watched a few videos on YouTube. Sure, he has that sort of tapping technique and a few fills on "My Generation," but is that it? I guess he did come before Jones et al., making him a pioneer?

I'm being serious here. I'm not trolling. What am I missing?

Ok. Here's a serious answer.
I'm not a big Who fan or is John on of my main influence, but he is a great innovator. This is that I can see assures him of being one of best:
1. His style. One of the first lead bassists.
2. His attack and tone. More than the usual two finger stroke.
3. Rotosound Roundwounds I believe we're based on his consultation.
4. On You tube, listen to some of his isolated tracks. Very cool.

Sounds like he may just not be your style. That's ok. Case in point, a lot of people really like Geezer Butler, (hmm?) but I don't. Take care and have a great day!
 
I'm happy that I had the honor to meet him 4 months before he passed. He was really nice with this dry humor. He poked fun at my Jazz bass pickguard that he autographed. Look to the left in my avatar and you can see it hanging on the wall.
I saw him at Toad Place in CT with his side band. It was a shred fest. He was such a monster player!
 
I'm happy that I had the honor to meet him 4 months before he passed. He was really nice with this dry humor. He poked fun at my Jazz bass pickguard that he autographed. Look to the left in my avatar and you can see it hanging on the wall.
I saw him at Toad Place in CT with his side band. It was a shred fest. He was such a monster player!
What did he say about your pick guard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
Are you asking for an objective justification of his musical value? I don't like The Who. I don't like white chocolate either. But other people do. That's the nature of individuality.
It amazes me that folks cannot separate their own tastes from whether something is 'quality'.

Example: I'm not a fan of Abba. But only a fool would deny that they were very talented, both in composition and performance. Great pop songs, terrific arrangements...

Entwistle was an innovator in both sound and technique. One need not dig the music of The Who to grasp that.