TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The first 3 shown to the public. They have stood the test of time.
All the others and the pointless Rogue One have been pretty horrid imo.
Rogue One might be one of the worst scripted poorly plotted shows I have ever seen. The score was even poorly done! The ONLY character you felt remotely drawn to was the Empire Droid. The rest were vapid or completely unnecessary. The main protagonist could be taken from the movie and it would not change it's plot in the least. He shot the mom. Oh boy now we really hate him. Then he shoots the engineers taking assets from the Empire. Wha?! The co main character kills a rebel early on to show how seriously he takes his job, then fails to shoot the father? Wha? Speaking of that, the rebels send a sniper to kill the father, then send a squadron of x wings ( gratuitous check list item from the franchise ) to blow him up? Wha!? The small crew we meet are the only ones willing to go get the plans but when they get there the Rebels decide "Oh, now we're all in!" ( gratuitous space battle complete with Star Destroyers crashing into a shield to take it down... wow haven't we seen this exact thing before? ) Every death was pointless except the droid. Just a terrible movie.
Umm what was the question? I seem to have ranted a bit![]()
I was working at Lucasfilm when the prequels came out. They had a tradition that when someone leaves they leave a Star Wars poster in the lobby and everyone signs it. They get the poster framed and present it to the person on their last day.I like all of them. I was 5 when the first one came out and was hooked. As for everybody bashing the prequels, I just remember seeing 2 jedi fighting side by side for the first time and was in awe. Then, in Episode 2, with all of the jedi fighting together, wow.
Yes, there are parts that I don't like in the prequels (midiclorians? seriously?), there are parts of the originals that I didn't like (Luke's whining for instance). In all, I'm a big fan of all things Star Wars.
I was working at Lucasfilm when the prequels came out. They had a tradition that when someone leaves they leave a Star Wars poster in the lobby and everyone signs it. They get the poster framed and present it to the person on their last day.
There was a poster from "The Phantom Menace" in the lobby that everyone was signing. The poster had a picture of Yoda and said "Size matters not, unless it's in Imax."
Some smart-alec at Lucasfilm wrote "And apparently neither does a plot" on the poster.
I liked the first one (later retitled Episode IV) best. The story was complete and consistent on its own terms, the characters were fun, and there were some absolutely classic scenes: the lightsaber duel, flying through the trench on the death star. And, as others have said, it's hard to appreciate it now, but the visual effects were amazing for 1977. It remains one of my favorite films of all time.
I liked Empire for deepening the character development and introducing Yoda, but disliked that it ended with so much unresolved and made me wait 3 years for the next episode. Then as the franchise went on, it seemed like story elements had to get more and more contrived to fit in. The last couple of movies reminded me of an aging rock band on a reunion tour. Do we really need to see a death star get blown up again? I'm getting tired of the whole thing.
This.
I hate that I live in a world where I constantly need to specify which "version" of which Star Wars movie I like. Hate it. Lucas came up with something magical and brilliant in 1977, then came back 20 years later and tried to destroy it by making it as mediocre as possible.
Han shot first, Jabba never went to Mos Eisly, and the Death Star exploded without a Praxis effect.
Unlike many originalists, I disliked Empire Strikes Back after Hoth. Yoda does not intrigue me.
So, yeah. The original 1977 theatrical Star Wars is my obvious choice.
Intrigue me, Yoda does not.
This.
I hate that I live in a world where I constantly need to specify which "version" of which Star Wars movie I like. Hate it. Lucas came up with something magical and brilliant in 1977, then came back 20 years later and tried to destroy it by making it as mediocre as possible.
Han shot first, Jabba never went to Mos Eisly, and the Death Star exploded without a Praxis effect.
Unlike many originalists, I disliked Empire Strikes Back after Hoth. Yoda does not intrigue me.
So, yeah. The original 1977 theatrical Star Wars is my obvious choice.

The first two were amazing, the third less so, but still pretty good. The prequels were horrifyingly bad, and the most recent two were a steep grade above the prequels, while a steep grade beneath the originals.
PS. Christmas Special was loathsome in every way, and had not one redeeming moment
I liked the first one (later retitled Episode IV) best. The story was complete and consistent on its own terms, the characters were fun, and there were some absolutely classic scenes: the lightsaber duel, flying through the trench on the death star. And, as others have said, it's hard to appreciate it now, but the visual effects were amazing for 1977. It remains one of my favorite films of all time.